The incompetent ghost of Lombardi strikes again.
Just like 16-17 with Quick, and last year with Carter, they're going to go with what they got. It's a hard cap league, they're last in the league, and Blake doing anything right now would be Lombardi level of bad GMing. He's working from a total position of weakness, and they don't even have any expiring contracts for the deadline. I would say expect nothing to happen, in whatever way you want to use that expectation. Nobody needs the Kings bad contracts. Nobody needs their old players. There's not going to be a fire sale, because there's nothing to sell.
The incompetent ghost of Lombardi strikes again.
Just like 16-17 with Quick, and last year with Carter, they're going to go with what they got. It's a hard cap league, they're last in the league, and Blake doing anything right now would be Lombardi level of bad GMing. He's working from a total position of weakness, and they don't even have any expiring contracts for the deadline. I would say expect nothing to happen, in whatever way you want to use that expectation. Nobody needs the Kings bad contracts. Nobody needs their old players. There's not going to be a fire sale, because there's nothing to sell.
Or it is Incompetent Blake striking as he has been the GM for two drafts/off-seasons. He doubled down on these guys and was most likely trading futures for Patches.
Lombardi made mistakes. No arguments there.
Blake has done jack **** except not trade futures outside of the Mitchell trade, although he can thank Patches for keeping it to only the Mitchell trade.
He's drafted and signed UFAs. Cool. He brought in Phaneuf and Thompson. Okay? He has not moved anyone of significance from a roster that nearly everyone on here believed would be a black hole at best squad last season (basically were one) and then added another big contract and age.
Screw this guy. No secret I don't like him but I've preached about it being too early to grade him: not anymore. He had a year to see what he had and he decided he had a great team and just needed more scoring from the wing.
Gross miscalculation. Now he is presiding over the worst start since they were purposefully tanking.
When your only major criticism of Blake is a rumored proposed trade that we don't know the cost of and was denied by the team, you really don't have much to go off of. I do agree that Lombardi was amazing, it likely was the right move to make the change, but he was a great GM for the team.
It isn't the only criticism but, regardless, the team denying it means nothing in the wake of it being widely reported and then Patches firing his agent over the whole debacle.
With that being said, the proof is in the pudding right now. He bet on this team and they are a tire fire.
Lombardi bet on his team that wasn't as far removed from success and he is a clown that couldn't keep up with the game changing.
Blake bets on a worse version of the same dudes but he is cool because there are prospects with more upside that could still amount to nothing but we like to pretend they will all reach their full potential, much like Hocking, Rosa, Storr, Berg, Zultek, Barney, Karlsson, Steckel, Tukonen, Tambellini, Grebeshkov, Pushkarev, Lehoux, Ryan, Hickey, Purcell, Teubert, Moller, Gibson, Forbort, Zykov, McKeown and Cernak all did.
I want him to do well. ****, I need him to do well. I'm not looking to cut off my nose to spite my face; however, I'm going to say he is **** the second he starts to smell like it.
LOL didn't know the Kings were last in the league.
People also ask
How long does it take to recover from torn meniscus surgery?
The patient may need crutches for about 6 weeks and can return to playing sports in approximately 3 months. Example 2: A patient who has surgery to repair a large meniscal tear as well as knee laxity may not be allowed to bend the knee for 4 to 6 weeks.
My point is that it was a rumored trade and we know nothing of what the return was going to be. Even McKenzie only said "the belief is that there was a deal in place", that is the closest to confirmation regarding this trade. He did bet on the team, but really didn't go all in, hence him standing pat at the deadline and making nearly all of his picks the past 2 drafts. I don't agree that Lombardi is a clown, I think he is a guy that got a bit too attached to his players. Loyalty is a fault, especially in his line of work, but calling him a clown is just ignorant.
While it isn't a super valuable pick, he did trade one for Mitchell. My point about betting on this team is not at last year's deadline but rather this past off-season.
He thought this team was better than it was. Now he is in a weak position to make a trade and the assets continue to depreciate.
I don't know about this. Lombardi acquired and developed Bernier and Jones. Both are NHL average to better than average NHL goalies.
In Quick, while he wasn't drafted by Lombardi, Lombardi cracked the whip (sent him down to ECHL) and Quick responded. Isn't having a dominant goalie one of the goals any GM should ascribe to for maximum success. Lombardi had two pretty good ones in Quick and Nabokov. Don't forget he drafted and developed Kiprusoff in San Jose as well.
My point is Dean Lombardi understands the importance of the goaltending position.
I don't know anything about this years kids. Are the top 5 really good?I can handle last place finish if the Kings can get Hughes or Kakko...then there's also Podkolzin, Cozens, Dach. if Kings are bottom 5. Trade Carter, Pearson, one of: Martinez, Muzzin now. Let the kids play. Believe it or not, by adding either Hughes or Kakko NEXT season, as well as (hopefully) Vilardi, JAD, and Kupari, this will actually be a good team and NO major rebuild.
All you said is true. But I think you missed the point, Kings never had a back up ready to replace Quick as he got older and fragile. That doesn't mean he doesn't draft good goalies. They just timed this all wrong.
What assets do you think he has that he can trade? Or that he could have traded since he has been GM?
From the way you talk about this team they seem to have the least amount of talent in the league, so even if our assets are depreciating, if there is not much in the first place are they really losing that much?
I think Blake is attempting a retool, however maybe he sees the team like you do and thinks this is the worst team in the league and that keeping them together will give us the best odds for a high draft pick.
Haha, maybe he is just playing mind games with everyone.
Because you can't on one hand complain about the team not purposefully losing, while at the same time complaining that the team is not winning.
I don't know anything about this years kids. Are the top 5 really good?
Hughes' 16-year-old season is essentially unprecedented for an American player. At USA Hockey's National Team Development Program, he put up 116 points -- just one point shy of Auston Matthews' program record. The big difference is Matthews did it when he was a year older. The previous high-water mark for a U17 player at the NTDP was 82 points set by Phil Kessel and Clayton Keller. That's a 34-point difference from what Hughes did. Last I checked, both of those guys are pretty good NHL players.
I was okay to give Blake a year last year to evaluate the team, give himself some time to look at the players, determine an identity and build it. He handled last year almost exactly as I wanted him to.
But now that he's had this time, he needs to act and start building. Frankly, it's a little galling he didn't choose to trade anyone for more picks at the draft.
The inaction in this organization is downright scary. It's a little encouraging the team opted for a lot of high risk/high reward picks at the draft, but the coaching and development staff have yet to yield many positive results, and there is nobody showing a willingness or ability to elevate their game further.
The Kings should not depend on a Norris and Hart caliber performance from their two key players to "eek" into the playoffs. Their performance this year is disappointing, which is why they're even lower in the standings, but they shouldn't be the difference between playoff team and worst team in the league.
Meh, Muzzin, Martinez, Toffoli, Pearson, and maybe Carter all still have value. It depends on injuries and what a team is looking for in a trade.
Or it is Incompetent Blake striking as he has been the GM for two drafts/off-seasons. He doubled down on these guys and was most likely trading futures for Patches.
Lombardi made mistakes. No arguments there.
Blake has done jack **** except not trade futures outside of the Mitchell trade, although he can thank Patches for keeping it to only the Mitchell trade.
He's drafted and signed UFAs. Cool. He brought in Phaneuf and Thompson. Okay? He has not moved anyone of significance from a roster that nearly everyone on here believed would be a black hole at best squad last season (basically were one) and then added another big contract and age.
Screw this guy. No secret I don't like him but I've preached about it being too early to grade him: not anymore. He had a year to see what he had and he decided he had a great team and just needed more scoring from the wing.
Gross miscalculation. Now he is presiding over the worst start since they were purposefully tanking.
Sorry, but I can't stand reading this bull****. The incompetent Dean Lombardi won your ass, and mine, TWO CUPS! Show some respect for ****s sake.
All you said is true. But I think you missed the point, Kings never had a back up ready to replace Quick as he got older and fragile. That doesn't mean he doesn't draft good goalies. They just timed this all wrong.
The problem with trading anyone this off-season, A. you wouldn't have been able to re-sign Doughty, and B. who replaces those, let's say you deal Carter...who is the 2nd line C, Kempe? Everyone *****es about him...., you trade Muzzin? Who replaces him, Brickley? he can't handle the AHL right now....
You actually have to have players in place to replace those you want traded, you have to make sure they are capable of replacing those players...
He's showing restraint and patience, exactly what you want in a GM, can you imagine the ****show if he trades Kempe and Kempe turns into a Nazem Kadri type player? Holy hell people around here would be offing themselves.....