GDT: Quarterfinal - May 17 - Sweden vs Latvia

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
You are allowed to be in the crease and even have incidental contact with the goalie if you are playing the puck, which is what both players were doing. Not a goalie interference.

In fact, the person who knocked the puck out of Merzlikins' cover was Blugers.

You are not allowed to wait for the puck in the crease. Perhaps in the NHL, but not in the rest of the world.
 
So an obvious goal is disallowed because the ref blew the whistle (or intended to) while the puck was still moving over the goal line and then Sweden gets one allowed despite a rugby scrum in the crease (which TSN very carefully tried to ignore with only two looks at it both from the vantage point of Anders Nilsson) Where are the behind the net angles? I fear the fix is in...

Yup, refs sure are looking for any old excuse to call penalties on Latvia. Fixed indeed. :laugh:
 
You are not allowed to wait for the puck in the crease. Perhaps in the NHL, but not in the rest of the world.
Wait??? The word wait means to bide until a desired, intended, or anticipated event takes place. Are you trying to say there was a screen in the crease prior to the one-timer?
 
Yup, refs sure are looking for any old excuse to call penalties on Latvia. Fixed indeed. :laugh:
Who said anything about penalties? The refs called off an obvious goal and then allowed one where it sure looked like there was clear goalie interference. Hard to tell when the powers that be refuse to show any kind of detailed replay. Who provides TSN with the video feed, Swedish TV?
 
The way i see it:
2 bogus minor penalty calls on Sweden
1 bogus whistle to nullify Latvia's goal.
One wasted goalie interference challenge.

Now please don't take penalties. Play simple.
 
Who said anything about penalties? The refs called off an obvious goal and then allowed one where it sure looked like there was clear goalie interference. Hard to tell when the powers that be refuse to show any kind of detailed replay. Who provides TSN with the video feed, Swedish TV?
Like has already been said. There's no goalie interference if contact is incidentally initiated in the process of playing the puck...
 
Im pretty sure that latvias 2-2 goal had been disallowed anyway! The Latvia player run into Nilsson and the puck went in, signal or not!
 
Who said anything about penalties? The refs called off an obvious goal and then allowed one where it sure looked like there was clear goalie interference. Hard to tell when the powers that be refuse to show any kind of detailed replay. Who provides TSN with the video feed, Swedish TV?

You sure didn't. Hence why I pointed it out, along with the ridiculous claim that the officials are somehow favouring Sweden. Quick whistles happen all the time.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad