WinTheRightGames
Registered User
- Jan 7, 2014
- 354
- 11
We don't have the top end talent to finish the chances available, there's been plenty in this game.
Well not sure if better, but yeah, 5 on 5 was fine.PP was the difference. Finland was better 5 on 5.
A team that never scores on the PP just doesn't belong in the medal rounds.
A team that never scores on the PP just doesn't belong in the medal rounds.
Ray is pissed. Suggesting Selanne run the PP next year.
Yeah by far the best in this tournament! but with this goalie and defens we are screwd:|
We don't have the top end talent to finish the chances available, there's been plenty in this game.
PP was the difference. Finland was better 5 on 5.
PP was the difference. Finland was better 5 on 5.
Yep, cue the grinders to be picked in later rounds. Puljujärvi is probably the only player on this team that deserves a second look. Otherwise, they're either blind or talentless.
Agree.A team that never scores on the PP just doesn't belong in the medal rounds.