DuklaNation
Registered User
- Aug 26, 2004
- 6,049
- 1,882
The refs were sold by the visuals on that majorMJ it’s not about being consistent for the rest of the night re: embellishment!
It should be that embellishment is no longer able to be called after Sykora sold a 5 minute call.
These refs are a f***ing joke
Team needs a few more OHL players. They’d definitely be better.That would make too much sense, but the London Knights are so great!
So it was a cross-check and a dive eh?
These refs are ass.
Not much ice time for those guys.Yes, keep playing Catton and Yager, the pair of apples between them has been our saviours. Which other WHL'er has been better?
Is Sykora all right?It was definitely embellishment.
Just like sykora
It was definitely embellishment.
Just like sykora
Well, yeah, a lot of people do that.He initially was very much saying it wasn't then when he saw the replay he flipped to that position.
Mike JohnsonWho is the TSN commentator, i don't mean the play-by-play dude but the other one?
Who is the TSN commentator, i don't mean the play-by-play dude but the other one?
They played Akey 2 minutes last game. They don’t care about straining energy levels.I get that, but the term "team defence" also applies. Straining the energy levels of these kids won't help long-term over the course of the game coming back down from 2.
Sure.The refs were sold by the visuals on that major
Mike JohnsonWho is the TSN commentator, i don't mean the play-by-play dude but the other one?
These guys are being considered for the Olympics ?!
I’d like to see diving and embellishment as two separate penalties. Dive is only if no offending penalty occurred and embellishment if you embellish an actual call.How are they ass? It can literally be both. A cross check was committed then the dive occurred.
I think we agree. Consistency is what is neededSure.
But they got to look at all of it in detail again at intermission.
They knew it was sold. That’s why no embellishment should be called after sykora got away with it.
They’re terible