SoundAndFury
Registered User
- May 28, 2012
- 12,284
- 6,274
I think it would be better for Switzerland if they scored a coupleUp early for this one, a great day of hockey ahead! The longer this goes scoreless, you have to think that's better for Switzerland (knock on wood).
The difference is Czechs offered at least some resistance, Swiss only real shot came on PP. In the last 10 minutes, they could hardly get into the zone.The game looks similar to Russia - Czech so far, like we play PP even when it's 5x5... We lost that game to Czech...
There is no way Russia gonna win Switzerland by playing like this, that Russian tactic so easy to defend.
Switzerland playing smart hockey.
The game looks similar to Russia - Czech so far, like we play PP even when it's 5x5... We lost that game to Czech...
Switzerland playing smart hockey.
Close one there. Swiss keeping the Russians a lot to the outside so far.
Remove the chance from Swiss and they are basically holding on for dear life for 18 mins straight.I didn't see the RUS-CZE game ... but the way this one is going down ... a Swiss win, in spite of the Russian dominance, is absolutely possible.
Russians are dominating ... but not to the point of anihilating all scoring attempts.
Remove the post and the best scoring chance was Swiss.
bruh we get it, you love yourself some swiss.If Russia doesn't change anything to 2nd or to 3rd and they won't get lucky bounces
i don't see them beating Switzerland in this game.
If Russia doesn't change anything to 2nd or to 3rd and they won't get lucky bounces
i don't see them beating Switzerland in this game.
holding on yes ... but not for dear life !!Remove the chance from Swiss and they are basically holding on for dear life for 18 mins straight.
bruh we get it, you love yourself some swiss.
This playstile requires no margin of error at all though. Turnovers like that from Knak and Moser need to stop next peroids.
There is no way Russia gonna win Switzerland by playing like this, that Russian tactic so easy to defend.
I understand that and somewhat agree but calling it a smart approach to any game is a huge stretch. A one mistake and they down a goal and need to totally change the way they play which easily leads to more scoring chances for an opponent and an eventual blowout.holding on yes ... but not for dear life !!
Russia wasn't that threatening.
Would the term soft domination be appropriate ?
(the Swiss goalie didn't have to stand on his head ... almost all routine saves !!)
Russia definitely has no chance to beat Switzerland while dominating them.