This thread is too long to catch back up on, but for anyone who's trying to claim that LA owned 5 on 5 play based on any page like Natural Stat Trick chart putting LA at 57 xGF% needs context. By NSTs metrics Smith's blunder directly led to 3 HD Scoring chances and a goal which amounted to approximatly 0.6 xGA. That means that one play directly led to 25% of LA xGF production (total 2.65 total xGF).
That game was a coin flip at 5 on 5 with Quick outplaying Smith until that gaffe. The only reason the team looks bad on those sites today is because the error was so bad it sunk the entire teams 5 on 5 performance. For proof look at the 5 on 5 xGF/xGA chart right at the time of the goal. Ironically, if he had just let the goal in without the first save, the xGF% is probably only about 52%-53%.
View attachment 539797
Overall, I didn't hate the Oilers game last night. They were goalied to a certain extent, but they at least found a way to score 3 against Quick who was having quite a game. They also didn't put in their best defensive effort, so tidy that up and have Smith shake it off they can take this back. But they need to find a way to score a 3rd period goal at some point (outscored 14-1 after the 2nd period during this 7 game playoff losing streak).