Laval Rocket: Providence Bruins at Laval Rocket 1 Nov 7PM

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,154
2,646
Oakville, ON
He's day to day.

oOUiiQN.gif
Beurre -Poulet gotta be eating Indian, to stay healthy.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SwiftyHab

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,800
12,597
We did play a pretty decent third period it's fun having a team who knows how to close out games fairly stress free.
I was able to watch the game and these are my observations.

Except for brief moments in the third period Laval was generally out played by Providence. For the first time this year, Laval looked like the slower team. Providence used a heavy forecheck and the Rocket had difficulty clearing their zone. Providence also used a strong active pressure system on Laval power play which largely neutralized Laval's power play. But for the goaltending of Hughes, this game is 4 to 5 goal loss.

As for the performance of our prospects I would report as follows:

Beck, despite his high-lite short-handed goal had one of his less productive games. I didn't find his skating as crisp as it has been in previous games and I found him being easily knocked down, at least in the first part of the game. Beck was also completely ineffective in the face-off circle. It was not surprising that the coaches didn't have him on the ice for that all important face-off in the last minute of play. On the positive side, Beck showed his one-timer in the second period and almost scored. He demonstrated his defensive commitment by blocking a dangerous shot late in the third period when Providence was pressing to tie the game. His high-lite shorthanded goal speaks for itself in addressing those who believe that Beck has a limited offensive ceiling. I am quite surprised how Laval uses Beck on the power-play where he is positioned at the other team's blueline and assumes a largely stationary position on his team's entry play. This player's game is built on his excellent mobility and to have him just stand there watching others try to gain entry and possession in the offensive zone is, in this writer's view, doing opposing teams a favour. Also, Beck needs to play with superior players who can take advantage of his explosive skating ability. With all due respect to #16, there were several times that Beck was breaking into the open ice and # 16 either couldn't read the play, or if he could, he didn't have the skill to get the puck to Beck. It was on those types of plays that you can see how much the Beck line misses Mesar and the play making he brings.

I thought Tuch, other than Hughes, was Laval's best player. Tuch skated miles tonight and was one of the few Laval players that looked like he could skate with, or even outskate, the Providence skaters. Tuch was a menace on the forecheck, backchecked furiously, was often the first on loose pucks in all zones and delivered a number of thundering body checks. Tuch continues to show that he is probably Laval's most NHL ready player. He has the size, skating and physical game to play at the next level.

Even against a fast and aggressive team, Roy, continued to show his elite hand skills and his uncanny ability to excel in close, tight quarters. He even displayed a burst of speed that allowed him to go around an opposing defenceman and get away a good shot on the goalie. Roy has a confidence with the puck that few, if any, of the other Laval players have. If he had better foot speed, Roy would be in the NHL now. But acquiring/developing that necessary skating ability may well be a bridge too far for this gifted player.

Florian Xhekaj continues to develop his game at a steady pace. You can sees this kid's improvement every game. Xhekaj presents as a tall, defensively responsible player who possesses unexpected offensive creativity and above average straight-forward speed. I thought Xhekaj and Tuch were both strong on the forecheck and caused a bit of Havoc in the offensive zone. Xhekaj made a number of subtle passes that allowed Laval to exit their defensive zone and created offensive chances. Xhekaj really shone on the penalty kill where his straight-forward speed, long stick and anticipation broke up several Providence rushes and created a number of shorthanded scoring chances. Both Xhekaj and Beck were horrible on face-offs and Xhekaj, like most young players, needs to get quicker to reach the next level. If he does, this kid will be an important player for Montreal going forward. But that's a big if.

Other than displaying his NHL level shot on the goal he scored ( a one timer slap shot from at the top of the circle on a Laval power play) Davidson had a workman-like, but quiet game. I believe Davidson may have been injured in the second period but he returned in the third period.

Both Kidney and Farrell had mediocre games. While Kidney continues to show improvement, against a very fast, aggressive opponent, Kidney was easily defended against and he was knocked off the puck regularly. Farrell continued to show bursts of energy and quickness but was physically overmatched in this game. While under pressure in his defensive zone, Farrell made a grievous turnover that quickly ended up in Laval's net. The biggest issue for Farrell is that he's not producing offensively. When you're an undersized forward who is not particularly strong or good defensively, if you are not scoring, or creating offensive chances, you have little chance of carving out a long term career in the NHL.

In his first game since being returned to Laval, Mailloux had a mixed game. The problems he had defensively in Montreal were largely repeated in Laval. I didn't see Mailloux beat any of the forechecking Providence forwards once by skating the puck out of his zone. I saw Providence forwards skate through and by Mailloux repeatedly and, on one occasion, force him to take a penalty when he was beaten wide. And this is the AHL. I saw Mailloux make several misreads in the defensive zone and have trouble, on occasion, controlling opposing players along the boards. And this is the AHL. On the positive side, Mailloux's stretch passing ability remains unmatched by any defensive (or for that matter any offensive) player on the ice. Its quite a talent. Also, he showed great mobility when he wasn't carrying the puck. When I first started following Mailloux in London, I opined that perhaps this player's future was as a power winger. I think that this possibility may have to be canvassed in the near future. He has several excellent skills. But defensive acumen and defensive mobility are not, at least as of now, among them.

Both Trudeau and Engstrom had challenging games as they, like all Laval defencemen, were under heavy pressure from the Providence forecheck. Of the two, Trudeau had the better all-round game as he showed his mobility and agility to largely escape and avoid the forecheck pressure he was facing. In addition, Trudeau had several good shifts in the offensive zone where his superior skating allowed him to create some offensive pressure and resulting scoring chances. As for Engstrom, he was largely unnoticeable as he was rarely able to create the offensive plays and breakouts that we have seen in previous games. Also a factor was the team's coaching decision of having Mailloux replace Engstrom on Laval's power play unit. In previous games, some of Engstrom's best plays and moments came while he manned the point on Laval's number 1 power play unit.
 
Last edited:

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
42,343
39,396
Montreal
Except for brief moments in the third period Laval was generally out played by Providence. For the first time this year, Laval looked like the slower team. Providence used a heavy forecheck and the Rocket had difficulty clearing their zone. Providence also used a strong active pressure system on Laval power play which largely neutralized Laval's power play. But for the goaltending of Hughes, this game is 4 to 5 goal loss.
Hughes was 1st and 2nd star.
What I liked about the third period was we were finally able to match Providence with 8 shots on goal each.
The active pressure system was handled better and kept to the outside for the most part.
We did have moments we were running around but I didn't sense that out of control game we saw in periods one and two.
These were not the same teams we saw in Providence where we skated them into the ice.
I'm hoping we get a better collective effort out of the lads today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
49,354
71,512
Texas
I was able to watch the game and these are my observations.

Except for brief moments in the third period Laval was generally out played by Providence. For the first time this year, Laval looked like the slower team. Providence used a heavy forecheck and the Rocket had difficulty clearing their zone. Providence also used a strong active pressure system on Laval power play which largely neutralized Laval's power play. But for the goaltending of Hughes, this game is 4 to 5 goal loss.

As for the performance of our prospects I would report as follows:

Beck, despite his high-lite short-handed goal had one of his less productive games. I didn't find his skating as crisp as it has been in previous games and I found him being easily knocked down, at least in the first part of the game. Beck was also completely ineffective in the face-off circle. It was not surprising that the coaches didn't have him on the ice for that all important face-off in the last minute of play. On the positive side, Beck showed his one-timer in the second period and almost scored. He demonstrated his defensive commitment by blocking a dangerous shot late in the third period when Providence was pressing to tie the game. His high-lite shorthanded goal speaks for itself in addressing those who believe that Beck has a limited offensive ceiling. I am quite surprised how Laval uses Beck on the power-play where he is positioned at the other team's blueline and assumes a largely stationary position on his team's entry play. This player's game is built on his excellent mobility and to have him just stand there watching others try to gain entry and possession in the offensive zone is, in this writer's view, doing opposing teams a favour. Also, Beck needs to play with superior players who can take advantage of his explosive skating ability. With all due respect to #16, there were several times that Beck was breaking into the open ice and # 16 either couldn't read the play, or if he could, he didn't have the skill to get the puck to Beck. It was on those types of plays that you can see how much the Beck line misses Mesar and the play making he brings.

I thought Tuch, other than Hughes, was Laval's best player. Tuch skated miles tonight and was one of the few Laval players that looked like he could skate with, or even outskate, the Providence skaters. Tuch was a menace on the forecheck, backchecked furiously, was often the first on loose pucks in all zones and delivered a number of thundering body checks. Tuch continues to show that he is probably Laval's most NHL ready player. He has the size, skating and physical game to play at the next level.

Even against a fast and aggressive team, Roy, continued to show his elite hand skills and his uncanny ability to excel in close, tight quarters. He even displayed a burst of speed that allowed him to go around an opposing defenceman and get away a good shot on the goalie. Roy has a confidence with the puck that few, if any, of the other Laval players have. If he had better foot speed, Roy would be in the NHL now. But acquiring/developing that necessary skating ability may well be a bridge too far for this gifted player.

Florian Xhekaj continues to develop his game at a steady pace. You can sees this kid's improvement every game. Xhekay presents as a tall, defensively responsible player who possesses unexpected offensive creativity and above average straight-forward speed. I thought Xhekaj and Tuch were both strong on the forecheck and caused a bit of Havoc in the offensive zone. Xhekaj made a number of subtle passes that allowed Laval to exit their defensive zone and created offensive chances. Xhekaj really shone on the penalty kill where his straight-forward speed, long stick and anticipation broke up several Providence rushes and created a number of shorthanded scoring chances. Both Xhekaj and Beck were horrible on face-offs and Xhekaj, like most young players, needs to get quicker to reach the next level. If he does, this kid will be an important player for Montreal going forward. But that's a big if.

Other than displaying his NHL level shot ( a one timer slap shot from at the top of the circle on a Laval power play) Davidson had a workman-like, but quiet game. I believe Davidson may have been injured in the second period but he returned in the third period.

Both Kidney and Farrell had mediocre games. While Kidney continues to show improvement, against a very fast, aggressive opponent, Kidney was easily defended against and he was knocked off the puck regularly. Farrell continued to show bursts of energy and quickness but was physically overmatched in this game. While under pressure in his defensive zone, Farrell made a grievous turnover that quickly ended up in Laval's net. The biggest issue for Farrell is that he's not producing offensively. When you're an undersized forward who is not particularly strong or good defensively, if you are not scoring, or creating offensive chances, you have little chance of carving out a long term career in the NHL.

In his first game since being returned to Laval, Mailloux had a mixed game. The problems he had defensively in Montreal were largely repeated in Montreal. I didn't see Mailloux beat the forechecking Providence once by skating the puck out of his zone. I saw Providence forwards skate through and by Mailloux repeatedly and forced him to take a penalty on one occasion when he was beaten wide. And this is the AHL. I saw Mailloux make several misreads in the defensive zone have trouble, on occasion, controlling opposing players along the boards. And this is the AHL. On the positive side, Mailloux's stretch passing ability remains unmatched by any defensive (or for that matter any offensive) player on the ice. Its quite a talent. Also, he showed great mobility when he wasn't carrying the puck. When I first started following Mailloux in London, I opined that perhaps this player's future was as a power winger. I think that this possibility may have to be canvassed in the near future. He has several excellent skills. But defensive acumen and defensive mobility are not, at least as of now, among them.

Both Trudeau and Engstrom had challenging games as they, like all Laval defencemen, were under heavy pressure from the Providence forecheck. Of the two, Trudeau had the better all-round game as he showed his mobility and agility to largely escape and avoid the forecheck pressure he was facing. In addition, Trudeau had several good shifts in the offensive zone where his superior skating allowed him to create some offensive pressure and resulting scoring chances. As for Engstrom, he was largely unnoticeable as he was rarely was able to create the offensive plays and breakouts that we have seen in previous games. Also a factor was the team's coaching decision of having Mailloux replace Engstrom on Laval's power play unit. In previous games, some of Engstrom's best plays and moments came while he manned the point on Laval's number 1 power play unit.
👍

Hughes was 1st and 2nd star.
What I liked about the third period was we were finally able to match Providence with 8 shots on goal each.
The active pressure system was handled better and kept to the outside for the most part.
We did have moments we were running around but I didn't sense that out of control game we saw in periods one and two.
These were not the same teams we saw in Providence where we skated them into the ice.
I'm hoping we get a better collective effort out of the lads today.
The key to the game today will be if Vincent plays Hughes again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rapala

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
42,343
39,396
Montreal
👍


The key to the game today will be if Vincent plays Hughes again.
28 shots not too bad but damn there were a ton of 10 bell opportunities given up.
To make matters worse 6 penalties which will always increase the work load exponentially regardless of shots.

With no penalties and only 8 shots in the third the only extended work load he faced was killing off the 6v5.

Team going for a franchise record...
Hughes is starting unless he wasn't able to recover his energy and fluids.
We used Dobes in similar situations multiple times and right now Hughes is our Dobes.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
49,354
71,512
Texas
28 shots not too bad but damn there were a ton of 10 bell opportunities given up.
To make matters worse 6 penalties which will always increase the work load exponentially regardless of shots.

With no penalties and only 8 shots in the third the only extended work load he faced was killing off the 6v5.

Team going for a franchise record...
Hughes is starting unless he wasn't able to recover his energy and fluids.
We used Dobes in similar situations multiple times and Hughes is our Dobes.
Houle did play Dobes back to back and I hope Vincent does so today with Hughes who is having one heck of a start to his NA career.
 

Sam de Mtl

Registered User
Oct 11, 2021
1,363
2,450
I was able to watch the game and these are my observations.

Except for brief moments in the third period Laval was generally out played by Providence. For the first time this year, Laval looked like the slower team. Providence used a heavy forecheck and the Rocket had difficulty clearing their zone. Providence also used a strong active pressure system on Laval power play which largely neutralized Laval's power play. But for the goaltending of Hughes, this game is 4 to 5 goal loss.

As for the performance of our prospects I would report as follows:

Beck, despite his high-lite short-handed goal had one of his less productive games. I didn't find his skating as crisp as it has been in previous games and I found him being easily knocked down, at least in the first part of the game. Beck was also completely ineffective in the face-off circle. It was not surprising that the coaches didn't have him on the ice for that all important face-off in the last minute of play. On the positive side, Beck showed his one-timer in the second period and almost scored. He demonstrated his defensive commitment by blocking a dangerous shot late in the third period when Providence was pressing to tie the game. His high-lite shorthanded goal speaks for itself in addressing those who believe that Beck has a limited offensive ceiling. I am quite surprised how Laval uses Beck on the power-play where he is positioned at the other team's blueline and assumes a largely stationary position on his team's entry play. This player's game is built on his excellent mobility and to have him just stand there watching others try to gain entry and possession in the offensive zone is, in this writer's view, doing opposing teams a favour. Also, Beck needs to play with superior players who can take advantage of his explosive skating ability. With all due respect to #16, there were several times that Beck was breaking into the open ice and # 16 either couldn't read the play, or if he could, he didn't have the skill to get the puck to Beck. It was on those types of plays that you can see how much the Beck line misses Mesar and the play making he brings.

I thought Tuch, other than Hughes, was Laval's best player. Tuch skated miles tonight and was one of the few Laval players that looked like he could skate with, or even outskate, the Providence skaters. Tuch was a menace on the forecheck, backchecked furiously, was often the first on loose pucks in all zones and delivered a number of thundering body checks. Tuch continues to show that he is probably Laval's most NHL ready player. He has the size, skating and physical game to play at the next level.

Even against a fast and aggressive team, Roy, continued to show his elite hand skills and his uncanny ability to excel in close, tight quarters. He even displayed a burst of speed that allowed him to go around an opposing defenceman and get away a good shot on the goalie. Roy has a confidence with the puck that few, if any, of the other Laval players have. If he had better foot speed, Roy would be in the NHL now. But acquiring/developing that necessary skating ability may well be a bridge too far for this gifted player.

Florian Xhekaj continues to develop his game at a steady pace. You can sees this kid's improvement every game. Xhekaj presents as a tall, defensively responsible player who possesses unexpected offensive creativity and above average straight-forward speed. I thought Xhekaj and Tuch were both strong on the forecheck and caused a bit of Havoc in the offensive zone. Xhekaj made a number of subtle passes that allowed Laval to exit their defensive zone and created offensive chances. Xhekaj really shone on the penalty kill where his straight-forward speed, long stick and anticipation broke up several Providence rushes and created a number of shorthanded scoring chances. Both Xhekaj and Beck were horrible on face-offs and Xhekaj, like most young players, needs to get quicker to reach the next level. If he does, this kid will be an important player for Montreal going forward. But that's a big if.

Other than displaying his NHL level shot ( a one timer slap shot from at the top of the circle on a Laval power play) Davidson had a workman-like, but quiet game. I believe Davidson may have been injured in the second period but he returned in the third period.

Both Kidney and Farrell had mediocre games. While Kidney continues to show improvement, against a very fast, aggressive opponent, Kidney was easily defended against and he was knocked off the puck regularly. Farrell continued to show bursts of energy and quickness but was physically overmatched in this game. While under pressure in his defensive zone, Farrell made a grievous turnover that quickly ended up in Laval's net. The biggest issue for Farrell is that he's not producing offensively. When you're an undersized forward who is not particularly strong or good defensively, if you are not scoring, or creating offensive chances, you have little chance of carving out a long term career in the NHL.

In his first game since being returned to Laval, Mailloux had a mixed game. The problems he had defensively in Montreal were largely repeated in Montreal. I didn't see Mailloux beat the forechecking Providence once by skating the puck out of his zone. I saw Providence forwards skate through and by Mailloux repeatedly and forced him to take a penalty on one occasion when he was beaten wide. And this is the AHL. I saw Mailloux make several misreads in the defensive zone and have trouble, on occasion, controlling opposing players along the boards. And this is the AHL. On the positive side, Mailloux's stretch passing ability remains unmatched by any defensive (or for that matter any offensive) player on the ice. Its quite a talent. Also, he showed great mobility when he wasn't carrying the puck. When I first started following Mailloux in London, I opined that perhaps this player's future was as a power winger. I think that this possibility may have to be canvassed in the near future. He has several excellent skills. But defensive acumen and defensive mobility are not, at least as of now, among them.

Both Trudeau and Engstrom had challenging games as they, like all Laval defencemen, were under heavy pressure from the Providence forecheck. Of the two, Trudeau had the better all-round game as he showed his mobility and agility to largely escape and avoid the forecheck pressure he was facing. In addition, Trudeau had several good shifts in the offensive zone where his superior skating allowed him to create some offensive pressure and resulting scoring chances. As for Engstrom, he was largely unnoticeable as he was rarely able to create the offensive plays and breakouts that we have seen in previous games. Also a factor was the team's coaching decision of having Mailloux replace Engstrom on Laval's power play unit. In previous games, some of Engstrom's best plays and moments came while he manned the point on Laval's number 1 power play unit.
I was at the game last night and quite agree with your assessments. I thought it was a joke that Connor Hughes only got 3rd star (not that it matters) as he was far and away the number 1 reason we got a win there.

The GWG was very pretty (and shorthanded), but it would have been meaningless without Hughes's brilliance.

I liked Tuch as well. Florian Xhekaj was pretty good. Roy had good moments. Kidney also, but he has a steep uphill battle to ever become an NHLer. I was slightly disappointed in Simoneau who played decent, but wasn't very impactful.

I liked Engstrom a bit more than you, but it's true his game was quite uneventful. I liked how he shared himself into some additional time and space at times, but in this game's case, it didn't amount to anything substantial.

I hear they hadn't played Providence in the previous year and it showed: they didn't really know how to play against this team. They were outplayed quite seriously.

So far Trudeau has looked much better than last year. Tough game for all, though. Hughes stole this one. He was outstanding.
True. I did comment to my friend at the game how Trudeau would most likely get lost in the numbers game in Montreal, but how I could see a solid NHL career from him.

I find he has been the most consistently good defensemen so far in this young season, yesterday included.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad