violaswallet
Registered User
- Apr 8, 2019
- 9,251
- 7,542
Following too!I just followed on Spotify, and then in the process of listening to the episode.
Following too!I just followed on Spotify, and then in the process of listening to the episode.
Thanks for the notes and for listening.@JonathanHuberdoh
So I'm listening to the podcast, but I have an advantage because the Panthers played last night. Maybe not an advantage, but some of your topics and questions were answered in last night's game. That's not catching my attention, not good.
What are your thoughts on doing a podcast the day after a game, for say, 15 minutes? If you slow down your talking a bit, not only will you sound more like Jim Rome, but you'll easily get 15-20 minutes per episode.
Just a thought...
And just take it as constructive criticism. By no means do I think it's bad. I really enjoy listening and have to do my part to make better notes and listen before I know game starts the following week.Thanks for the notes and for listening.
I am struggling with the idea of weekly podcasts, especially with this week's episode being outdated almost immediately.
I've wrestled with the idea of doing a smaller show after every game but editing/producing/packaging it is quite time consuming and I don't know if I'd have the time to do that every night on a consistent basis.
Still something I am considering though. Appreciate the feedback. Am I talking too quickly? Are you unable to understand what I say?
Thanks for the notes! Don't worry I welcome any critique, honestly. I only want to get better so any advice is very helpful, I promiseAnd just take it as constructive criticism. By no means do I think it's bad. I really enjoy listening and have to do my part to make better notes and listen before I know game starts the following week.
No I can hear fine. I was just thinking that I really enjoy your voice , sounds a lot like Jim Rome to me. I know Jim is famous for taking long pauses that kind of keep you on the edge of your seat waiting for what he'll say next. I feel like you have that gift as well.
I totally understand that stuff takes time. I used to do a blue jays podcast, but wasn't nearly as professional as yours. Back when I was drinking I would have a smoke, and have a beer, and talk about the Blue Jays for half hour.
Just something to consider.
Honestly I love the idea of taking a deeper dive. All I've ever wanted from this podcast is to drive more discussion about the Panthers online as I feel like our online presence is borderline non-existent.If you want maybe try to get some of the guys (maybe batting?) who can do a short analytics piece for you monthly?
I thjnk sometimes we don’t look at the data because we are a small market team
Yep: I’d offer to help someone; I’m certainly not an expert so the idiot leading the blind etc etcHonestly I love the idea of taking a deeper dive. All I've ever wanted from this podcast is to drive more discussion about the Panthers online as I feel like our online presence is borderline non-existent.
Definitely open to it, especially if it's someone like Batting or someone else who is well versed in that stuff.
So here are my notes. (The skateboarding question remains to be answered ) :I just finished listening, and made some notes. I'll share those maybe later on tonight.
My first immediate question no is did/do you skate?
I personally don't, I grew up in a rural setting on a gravel road, so the opportunity wasn't very plentiful. But my brother-in-law is a really good skateboarder . He even built a halfpipe in his garage, and every week some of his buddies come over to skate with him. Even has friends that are sponsored. Takes so much talent to do that. As an Arena worker, I kind of compare it to figure skating. That's what always blew my mind. The things those figure skaters did on the ice was magical. Not even going to get into how they don't even wear helmets!
So here are my notes. (The skateboarding question remains to be answered ) :
TB
CAR
- Juuls seems to be and Qs dog house. We've seen before that this can be very hard to get out of, example being Saarella.
- Are we even sure that Stammer scored that goal? I still have yet to see a definitive view of the puck going in the net. It is irrelevant now.
- You did mention how Judge stood tall all night. Wasn't that one goal on Judge very weak? You seem to have skimmed over that.
DET I
- I find it funny how you mentioned that you had to relax after that first.. Me myself, being a Kansas City Chiefs fan, I've learned that it's not over until it's over. These last three years I've seen a lot of remarkable football, and big-time comebacks. Watching them has turn me into a very calm sports fan.
- Skateboarding question.
DET II
- Judge had a bad first goal. I noticed that when you talk about Judge's bad goals, you almost always fall with with a "but". Not sure I've ever heard you do the same for Bob. Just something I've noticed.
- Nice of you to mention Cheeka. I was watching the game on the Red Wing feed, and they had a nice piece on him during one of the intermissions.
- Really nice to hear someone else on this forum say they don't think they lost that game due to Bob. Sometimes I wonder if I'm even watching the same game as other people. Yes, he did allow two not great goals, but the team only scored one goal. They have to do better if they want to continue to win more often than not.
- I agree wholeheartedly on when Q mixes the lines. Just leave the lines alone and let the players play! As a player, there was not much more I would hate than having to be on a different line mid-game. Players like consistency.
- Faceoffs! This has been a problem with this team most of the season, and it keeps rearing its ugly head at times. It needs to be addressed!
I am here to announce that I was very wrong about Gudas. He has been a great signing. Whether it's the physical aspect he brings, the leadership he probably carries and respect that I'm sure he gets from his teammates. Not to mention him being paired with Yands and keeping him bearable on this team. I thought he was going to regress, exactly the opposite. Again, great signing.
I wrote down the email for questions, and I'll be sure to get one in as soon as I think of a good one.
Keep up the good work!
Episode 6 of Project Panthers, "Resilience" is now available! This week's episode features a question from a well known local around these parts Please like and subscribe. If you have any questions or comments please let us know down below! We can open up discussion and we’ll answer questions on next week's show. Go Cats Go!
Where you can find us:
Spotify:
Apple: Project Panthers on Apple Podcasts
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/projectpantherspod/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ProjPanthers
Soundcloud: Project Panthers
Feel free to send your questions to:
[email protected]
BTW, thanks for letting me continue to bump this thread and promote my show, and to anyone who has been listening. I really appreciate the support!!
Panthers seem to hold their own in the faceoff circle last night, only losing the overall percentage 51 to 49%.
Another big test coming up next; Nashville is 11th in the league in faceoffs.
Nashville scored more than three goals only twice in February. If the Panthers can get the first goal on them, that would really put the pressure on Nashville to score.
Saying that though, there are no easy games in the league this year.
Love this. In my MS world, adaptacion is everything. Some say the best people in the world at adapting are people with MS.9 for 25 on the PP (36%) through the first 11 games (5 of those PPG came against Detroit).
Last 10 games, they're 6 for 35 (17%) so a massive drop off in percentage over the last 10 games. Definitely not coincidental that our offensive output has also dropped.
I think it's time to change around the strategy. Put Verhaeghe in Barkov's spot, push Barkov to the point, move Yandle down to PP2 and Tippett to the the second unit.
The current strategy of passing it 1000 times until Ekblad gets open us obviously no longer viable. Time to adapt.
9 for 25 on the PP (36%) through the first 11 games (5 of those PPG came against Detroit).
Last 10 games, they're 6 for 35 (17%) so a massive drop off in percentage over the last 10 games. Definitely not coincidental that our offensive output has also dropped.
I think it's time to change around the strategy. Put Verhaeghe in Barkov's spot, push Barkov to the point, move Yandle down to PP2 and Tippett to the the second unit.
The current strategy of passing it 1000 times until Ekblad gets open us obviously no longer viable. Time to adapt.
Someone should definitely get a little creative, and moving Barkov into Ekblad's spot on the right side could be worth a shot. It's a problem that we have two players who should play on the left side (Huberdeau/Ekblad) and nobody who should play the right side (although Barkov could be the answer).9 for 25 on the PP (36%) through the first 11 games (5 of those PPG came against Detroit).
Last 10 games, they're 6 for 35 (17%) so a massive drop off in percentage over the last 10 games. Definitely not coincidental that our offensive output has also dropped.
I think it's time to change around the strategy. Put Verhaeghe in Barkov's spot, push Barkov to the point, move Yandle down to PP2 and Tippett to the the second unit.
The current strategy of passing it 1000 times until Ekblad gets open us obviously no longer viable. Time to adapt.