Melvin
21/12/05
I haven’t seen a GM in history get as much fan support for making a team worse than Benning.
Some people just love losers
Go to the Ottawa board. It's the same trash. But teh prospects!
I haven’t seen a GM in history get as much fan support for making a team worse than Benning.
Some people just love losers
My solution is to get the kids to compete as hard as they can night in night out, and surround them with vets that can hold the kids accountable and teach the kids the right habit. Condition the kids to work their butts off, and let the tank happen naturally if they aren't good enough (which will likely be the case). Exactly how management has been doing things.
The "Pro Tankers" seem to want little to no presence of vets, hand all/most of the kids NHL roles (without having have them earn said spots or beat out a vet for said spots), throw the kids to the wolves, make the kids lose confidence by having them get owned by the opposition, having the kids stop competing hard by mid November since they'll be way out playoff contention by this time, and then hope and pray for great lottery odds.
In my opinion, my solution makes sense. Conditioning the kids to working hard and dangling a carrot in front of them (i.e. playoffs are a possibility) breeds character in the long run. Tanking via absence of vets or veteran firesale breeds cowards and kills the spirit of young players (is it a coincidence that many young oiler players that left Edmonton, "magically" became much better on their new teams?).
This isn’t at all what pro tankers want. You’ve invented a silly position just so you have something easy to argue with.
Pro tankers do want young kids to have opportunities to make the team, that is true. There is an imbalance in terms of the number of vets on this team and the number of young players. We are going into year 5 of a rebuild and Pettersson would represent just the 8th rookie over that span (Horvat, Virtanen, McCann, Hutton, Tryamkin, Stecher, and Boeser).
The other issue has been the unwillingness or inability to trade vets for picks and prospects. Bieksa and Burrows are the only two success stories. Hansen went for an AHL prospect which is already looking like a mistake. Vanek yielded a 4th liner who, while useful, is hardly a core piece of a rebuild. Hamhuis, Miller, Tanev, Kassian, Higgins, Garrison, and Kesler are other veteran assets that in one way or another were mishandled or wasted on “compete now” assets rather than pieces befitting to a rebuild.
There’s more but it’s tiresome to have to repeat the same basic arguments for the 100th time.
It's the same stupid strawman/false dichotomy argument he busts out every time this comes up. I really wish people would just ignore it.This isn’t at all what pro tankers want. You’ve invented a silly position just so you have something easy to argue with.
Pro tankers do want young kids to have opportunities to make the team, that is true. There is an imbalance in terms of the number of vets on this team and the number of young players. We are going into year 5 of a rebuild and Pettersson would represent just the 8th rookie over that span (Horvat, Virtanen, McCann, Hutton, Tryamkin, Stecher, and Boeser).
The other issue has been the unwillingness or inability to trade vets for picks and prospects. Bieksa and Burrows are the only two success stories. Hansen went for an AHL prospect which is already looking like a mistake. Vanek yielded a 4th liner who, while useful, is hardly a core piece of a rebuild. Hamhuis, Miller, Tanev, Kassian, Higgins, Garrison, and Kesler are other veteran assets that in one way or another were mishandled or wasted on “compete now” assets rather than pieces befitting to a rebuild.
There’s more but it’s tiresome to have to repeat the same basic arguments for the 100th time.
Fair enough.
So lets hold hands and be negative together I guess.
#TheSkyIsFalling #WeWillNeverGetBetter #BenningSux
The new Jersey devils last season had 8 rookies in their opening night lineup. Eight rookies in one game! I watched the game and it was a ton of fun
Can't remember if they won or not but who cares. I don't think all the rookies stuck for the whole season but it was a clear sense of direction and their overall season was so much better than ours, and they have not been anywhere near as crap as we have been for as long.
But teh mentorship.
At least, check your damn facts straight. In 3 games, you get 5 rookies:8 rookies eh?? Hmm if only there was a way to fact check your biased and exagurated post....oh wait.
So lets count the rookies
Will Butcher
Jesper Brat
Blake Coleman
Nico Hischier
Jimmy Hayes
I see 5 here. Tell me how u got 8.
View attachment 141705
At least, check your damn facts straight. In 3 games, you get 5 rookies:
@ Blue Jackets, Feb 10: Will Butcher, Jesper Brat, Blake Coleman, Nico Hischier, Jimmy Hayes and John Quenneville
vs Calgary, Feb 8: Will Butcher, Jesper Brat, Blake Coleman, Nico Hischier, Jimmy Hayes and John Quenneville
vs Nashville, Jan 25: Will Butcher, Jesper Brat, Blake Coleman, Nico Hischier, Jimmy Hayes and Kevin Rooney
Only if it there was a way to... never mind, you can't understand nothing than the orders your master and commander Benning asks you to do. Wooof.
"Everything is great! Everything is wonderful! Benning is building a winner! Very...very slowly!"
Actual pro-Benning poster:
"Everything is great! Everything is wonderful! Benning is building a winner! Very...very slowly!"
How about they don't grossly overpay for these vets and sign them to long term contracts? I'm sure the young guys watching Loui soak up 6 million to produce less than them will teach them a lot. A lot about how much money to demand on their next contract.My solution is to get the kids to compete as hard as they can night in night out, and surround them with vets that can hold the kids accountable and teach the kids the right habit. Condition the kids to work their butts off, and let the tank happen naturally if they aren't good enough (which will likely be the case). Exactly how management has been doing things.
The "Pro Tankers" seem to want little to no presence of vets, hand all/most of the kids NHL roles (without having have them earn said spots or beat out a vet for said spots), throw the kids to the wolves, make the kids lose confidence by having them get owned by the opposition, having the kids stop competing hard by mid November since they'll be way out playoff contention by this time, and then hope and pray for great lottery odds.
In my opinion, my solution makes sense. Conditioning the kids to working hard and dangling a carrot in front of them (i.e. playoffs are a possibility) breeds character in the long run. Tanking via absence of vets or veteran firesale breeds cowards and kills the spirit of young players (is it a coincidence that many young oiler players that left Edmonton, "magically" became much better on their new teams?).
If we're the worst team in the league this year, maybe we get Jack Hughes.........to go along with Quinn Hughes, Elias Pettersson, Brock Boeser, etc.
It's not a matter of IF........it's a matter of WHEN the Canucks will rise again.
This is a marathon. Not a sprint.
Being so negative is just dumb and pointless.
All sports franchises rebuild and go through peaks and valleys.
We are no different.
Just making garbage claims like, "I don't think we'll win a game until November," is just toxic and unnecessarily negative in my opinion. It's disturbing really. Most true fans, regardless of how good or bad their team is, will often feel "rejuvinated" and "fresh" when a new season is about to start. We get to watch our favourite team after half a year off.
What's disturbing is how you constantly ignore truths and believe our situation has improved. You preach of all the 'positives' while not mentioning any realities and truths. THIS is disturbing!
How can any individual purposely deceive himself and actually believe his own deception?
I'm sure all the fans, true or not (and you may consider yourself true, but ignorance does not equate one fan above others), went into these preseason games with a glimmer of hope, rejuvination and hope for a fresh start...but it didn't take long for reality to kick in and realize that we are no better off than the previous years.
People like you seem to live in a bubble...we make a couple trades and trust that all of our prospects have elevated their game to the next level. Preach and praise the mgt and believe that there's so much improvement while you ignorantly believe the rest of the teams in the league and their prospects have become stagnant over the summer. Get all hyped up and than continuously make up lies and excuses for the following failure of a season.
Ignorance is one of the most disturbing distasteful qualities any person can have.
Lol let me assure you that NO ONE on the Sens board supports Dorion.Go to the Ottawa board. It's the same trash. But teh prospects!
1) Over the last 20-25 years, how many bad teams have been in the NHL that have remained bottom feeders or non playoff teams for years on end? In my opinion, for every Chicago, Pittsburgh, and Toronto created (by the way, Toronto hasn’t done jack yet and so I’m being generous by letting you cite the Leafs ), there are FAR more examples of bottom feeding teams that were not successful in rebuilding.
Just a guess but that might be related to having average / bad management and only turned it around once competent people got in.
The 2007/2008 team was a game away from taking over the lead of it's division with ~10 games left in the season they imploded down the stretch and finished the year with 88 points, and missed the playoffs by 3 points.
I think that's a bit optimistic.
Can you please explain the "throwing the kids to the wolves comment"? What do you see our projected top 6 being this year?
Pettersson and Boeser will have to carry the offensive load for the team this year. Isn't that by definition throwing them into the wolves? Adding bottom 6 replacement level junk isn't going to stop the youngest players on the team from carrying the largest load.
When I think of easing young players in I look at what Winnipeg did for someone like Scheifele they had him playing behind the Ladd/Little/Wheeler line until he was ready to take over for Little. With Laine and Ehlers they were able to play them behind Scheifele and Wheeler. They didn't have bottom 6 junk "teaching how to play the right way"
You can pile together as many buzz words and cliches as you want, it doesn't make your argument any more credible.
This isn’t at all what pro tankers want. You’ve invented a silly position just so you have something easy to argue with.
Pro tankers do want young kids to have opportunities to make the team, that is true. There is an imbalance in terms of the number of vets on this team and the number of young players. We are going into year 5 of a rebuild and Pettersson would represent just the 8th rookie over that span (Horvat, Virtanen, McCann, Hutton, Tryamkin, Stecher, and Boeser).
The other issue has been the unwillingness or inability to trade vets for picks and prospects. Bieksa and Burrows are the only two success stories. Hansen went for an AHL prospect which is already looking like a mistake. Vanek yielded a 4th liner who, while useful, is hardly a core piece of a rebuild. Hamhuis, Miller, Tanev, Kassian, Higgins, Garrison, and Kesler are other veteran assets that in one way or another were mishandled or wasted on “compete now” assets rather than pieces befitting to a rebuild.
There’s more but it’s tiresome to have to repeat the same basic arguments for the 100th time.