But see, I don't believe she was in it for the status or the $$$$.....its not like she was some poor girl from the streets.....she was an established Hollywood starlet already making millions.
Sounds like they can pay for security then like literally every other celebrity family in California.
When they originally came to Canada to "flee the paparazzi" and "escape the Royal life", I think people were supportive. I know I was.
Then it was that they wanted their security paid for by the Canadian government, e.g. the Canadian taxpayer, and Canadians were not supportive of that.
If they had been here in some official capacity, performing some role for the country, that perception might have differed.
I was a bit dubious when they then decided to move to the most paparazzi-infested location on the planet, and that somehow this is a more secure location.
I've no doubt that Meghan was not always treated fairly by the Firm, a situation that no doubt extended to Kate and Diana and others who married into the family. The degree of racism she personally encountered is likely something that will be debated.
I do know that the Queen has developed and supported the Commonwealth of nations for her entire life, which is a largely black community, so the accusation that they are all inherently racist puzzles me.
Harry's previous relationship with Chelsy Davy ended because she did not want to live the life of a Royal. It was clear to her what the expectations were, and she chose not to live that life.
For the record, I think the idea of a monarchy is archaic and ridiculous. The main reason I'm against abolishing it in Canada is the headache of what will replace it here as Head of State.
But I also think that Meghan wanted to have her cake and eat it too. They were financially cut off from benefitting from being Royals when they willingly chose to abdicate their responsibilities.
Trying to profit and merchandise on "Duke and Duchess of Sussex" for their own private gain without giving back in return in accordance with the requirements of the office is precisely the kind of thing that the Windsor family has to be cognizant of because the optics of a wealthy landowning family in symbolic control of a democratic nation is bad enough as it is.
I actually met and spoke with Princess Diana in person when I lived in Germany. She and Prince Charles were called upon to do an opening of a new wing at the British school I was attending. It certainly brightened the day of the children in the facility. To say that the Royals don't have any responsibilities is a silly argument.