Toggle sidebar

Preferred quarter final opponent of big 5?

Who is your preferred quarter final opponent in a beat on best?

  • Canada

    Votes: 1 5.9%

  • USA

    Votes: 1 5.9%

  • Sweden

    Votes: 1 5.9%

  • Finland

    Votes: 5 29.4%

  • Russia

    Votes: 9 52.9%
  • Total voters
    17
Czechboy

Czechboy

Easy schedules rule!
Apr 15, 2018
21,573
17,656
166
So I'm curious. Let's say there was a real best on best. And Russia was playing. Everyone is invited. Swiss, Latvia, Czechs and Russians. All players are available from all the leagues.

Here is the question. Who is your preferred quarter final opponent of the big 5? They are all amazing. So I'm curious who everyone would prefer on the way to the semifinals?
 
I voted Russia. I don't have a logical explanation about why. It may be because we beat them the last time we played them in a best on best quarterfinal. However, thinking as I write at the same time, Canada is obviously the worst one to draw in the quarterfinals. That leaves Sweden and Finland. Those two have a track record and history of a very high level of team play regardless of the actual talent on the roster, so they scare me in that sense. I guess that leads me to Russia anyway.

Joke addition: the ideal opponent to draw in the quarterfinal is the USA, because if we play against ourselves, then we win. :P
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Czechboy
Summer Rose said:
I voted Russia. I don't have a logical explanation about why. It may be because we beat them the last time we played them in a best on best quarterfinal. However, thinking as I write at the same time, Canada is obviously the worst one to draw in the quarterfinals. That leaves Sweden and Finland. Those two have a track record and history of a very high level of team play regardless of the actual talent on the roster, so they scare me in that sense. I guess that leads me to Russia anyway.

Joke addition: the ideal opponent to draw in the quarterfinal is the USA, because if we play against ourselves, then we win. :P
Click to expand...
US are the paper champs right now.. and they are terrifying. They have F and D that can match Canada and G's that can counter the Russian Troika! Canada is Canada. Swedes are never an easy out. Finn's are the most successful at Quarters using best on best Olympics (4 out of 5 at 80%... possible Canada was 80% too but they lost Semi and Bronze - to Finland in Nagano).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Pavel Buchnevich said:
Finland has the worst team of the five, so probably them.
Click to expand...
I would take a healthy Team Finland over Russia and maybe even Sweden, but Finland lacks depth so an injury to someone like Heiskanen or Barkov drops them below them on paper. We did beat Sweden without Heiskanen in the 4 Nations now that I think about it, with Miro I'd be even more confident. Playing style wise we match up worse against NA opponents though, so it's match up based too.
 
Last edited:
heksagon said:
I would take a healthy Team Finland over Russia and maybe even Sweden, but Finland lacks depth so an injury to someone like Heiskanen or Barkov drops them below them on paper. We did beat Sweden without Heiskanen in the 4 Nations now that I think about it, with Miro I'd be even more confident. Playing style wise we match up worse against NA opponents though, so it's match up based too.
Click to expand...
You beat Sweden in OT. An important note.
 
heksagon said:
I would take a healthy Team Finland over Russia and maybe even Sweden, but Finland lacks depth so an injury to someone like Heiskanen or Barkov drops them below them on paper. We did beat Sweden without Heiskanen in the 4 Nations now that I think about it, with Miro I'd be even more confident. Playing style wise we match up worse against NA opponents though, so it's match up based too.
Click to expand...
I would not. Russia’s weakness, centers, is better than Finland’s weakness, the whole defense.

Finland basically doesn’t have more than one guy who can play an NHL PP on that backend and probably only one real first pairing defenseman.

Miro is great, but let’s not make him into something he’s not. He’s not the best defenseman ever. The reason the defense needs him so much is because he’s the only good defenseman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
Russia. I don't think Finland has lost to them since 1998. Sweden would be another choice. Beating them without Heiskanen in 4 nations was nice enough.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: heksagon
Pavel Buchnevich said:
I would not. Russia’s weakness, centers, is better than Finland’s weakness, the whole defense.

Finland basically doesn’t have more than one guy who can play an NHL PP on that backend and probably only one real first pairing defenseman.

Miro is great, but let’s not make him into something he’s not. He’s not the best defenseman ever. The reason the defense needs him so much is because he’s the only good defenseman.
Click to expand...

Here's the thing though, you don't really need more than one PP quarterback if he is healthy. And unlike in the 4 Nations, in the Olympics you can pick someone like Sami Vatanen, Mikko Lehtonen or Atro Leppänen to also run a PP. Your last sentence is questionable: While players like Mikkola, Lindell and Määttä can't really run a PP, they are solid defensively and they are definitely good defensemen. Not great or star players, but definitely good. I have no idea how Mikkola and Lindell still fly so under the radar with so many eyes on Florida and Dallas being Stanley Cup favourites (Well, somehow an even better Forsling still gets that too). We wouldn't have beaten Sweden in the 4 Nations if Heiskanen was all we had.

Sergachev, Provorov, Gavrikov etc. are certainly very good, but you are acting like the rest of Finland's D would be pylons compared to them. The center group of Barkov, Aho, Hintz, Lundell and Granlund over an aging Malkin and co. is just as big of a difference, if not more. Who does Russia have at center, I am genuinely curious if I'm missing someone: Malkin and Namestnikov from the NHL? Buchnevich with his faceoff win-% of 37 seems like a bad idea at center. Kuznetsov, Shipachyov, Demidov, Shabanov from the KHL? There's lots of talent there, but... yeah.

The difference between Finland's and Russia's centers makes up for the difference between Russia's and Finland's defense, especially considering Heiskanen clears all Russian defensemen. Russia's wingers are scary talented though.

For Finland Russia is still the clear pick IMO, the historical results are great and the present match up more favourable than the other options. Allthough none of these are obviously easy at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Czechboy
heksagon said:
Here's the thing though, you don't really need more than one PP quarterback if he is healthy. And unlike in the 4 Nations, in the Olympics you can pick someone like Sami Vatanen, Mikko Lehtonen or Atro Leppänen to also run a PP. Your last sentence is questionable: While players like Mikkola, Lindell and Määttä can't really run a PP, they are solid defensively and they are definitely good defensemen. Not great or star players, but definitely good. I have no idea how Mikkola and Lindell still fly so under the radar with so many eyes on Florida and Dallas being Stanley Cup favourites (Well, somehow an even better Forsling still gets that too). We wouldn't have beaten Sweden in the 4 Nations if Heiskanen was all we had.

Sergachev, Provorov, Gavrikov etc. are certainly very good, but you are acting like the rest of Finland's D would be pylons compared to them. The center group of Barkov, Aho, Hintz, Lundell and Granlund over an aging Malkin and co. is just as big of a difference, if not more. Who does Russia have at center, I am genuinely curious if I'm missing someone: Malkin and Namestnikov from the NHL? Buchnevich with his faceoff win-% of 37 seems like a bad idea at center. Kuznetsov, Shipachyov, Demidov, Shabanov from the KHL? There's lots of talent there, but... yeah.

The difference between Finland's and Russia's centers makes up for the difference between Russia's and Finland's defense, especially considering Heiskanen clears all Russian defensemen. Russia's wingers are scary talented though.

For Finland Russia is still the clear pick IMO, the historical results are great and the present match up more favourable than the other options. Allthough none of these are obviously easy at all.
Click to expand...
I’m talking about good players in the sense of how they fit into the best on best level. This is a level beyond a normal NHL game. This is basically the NHL All-Stars, and Finland only has 1 player at that level on defense. Mikkola and Lindell are not top 50 defensemen in the NHL.

Not only does Russia have those players you named on defense, but you have someone like Nikishin, arguably the best prospect outside the NHL. You have Orlov. Romanov. Zub. To me that’s a deeper and more skilled blue line than what Finland has. I’ll even grant Finland the best defenseman with Heiskanen, but I don’t find the depth all that close.

Russia’s center weakness is bad, but to me it’s not as bad as Finland’s defense. Barbashev has been fantastic the last few seasons. Buchnevich isn’t a natural center, but can play center and is a very good player. They obviously still have Malkin, who is very good even at his old age. It’s a weakness, but it’s stronger than Finland’s defense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom