kingskring
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2012
- 3,621
- 1,909
I don't get this board sometimes. Aren't we tanking? Who gives a **** if Quick doesn't play well? Doesn't that play into the hand we want? They got their ass beat. So what. This season has already been written off by management. They said as much when they hired TM. He's here for the rebuild. Well, rebuilds involve being really bad and Quick's at the end of his career so who cares if he's bad or not? Unless he wants out.
I think they would like to see what they have in Cal and it's just difficult because they would have to basically have a $6m a year #3 goaltender.
Right now this is like when the last rebuild started and the Kings correctly pegged Quick as the guy, fortunately then Dan Cloutier didn't have 4 years left on his contract and blocking him from icetime. Right now there is no upside at all to Quick and it's likely hurting the development of Cal. Who at 25 years old should not still be in the AHL. The goaltending duo should be Cal and Campbell, but unfortunately it probably never will be.
Nothing should change imo.
Split start Quick and Campbell 50/50 thru the 1st 20 games. If things continue as they have the last year or so, start Campbell 2/3 of the games for the remainder of the season.
If Campbell plays well, hopefully Carolina or another team trades for him.
Then do the same thing with Petersen. (Ease him in to the starting role, not trade him).
Quick can be an expensive backup. We wont need cap space for the next few years anyways.
no shitCanucks fan coming in peace. Half those options are unrealistic. Kings can’t release him, he’s not going to retire and forego 5.8Mx4, no ones gonna trade for him. You’re only hope is you ltiretire him or let him find his game in the ahl