Ritchie and Bunting have taken the superiour places in this vote sire!They LEAD with big numbers as we speak. Hfboards already decided the malhotra thang (concerning his powerplay coaching), he was almost fired entirely. Now he only gets to speak, but not coach anymore behind the bench. Hfboards did that.
Him not being able to keep up means 3 other players won't be able to either? At least make sense when you post your miserable takes
He is faster than Thornton who with Marner/Matthews had a GF% around 65% (the same as Hyman) with over 200 minutes of play together.
He played top 6 most of the year for Boston.
Boston plays a much different style of game. He's more logical for them. But even still, they passed on his this year.
I'm ready milord!Hf has spoken, but Keefe doesn't post here. It's his call now. Last year he surprised everyone by putting Jumbo on the top line.
Brace yourself.
I admire yet another attempt by you to derail a thread with the same nonsense as every other thread on the board, but the fact is Boston was a very good team and Ritchie was part of their top-6 the majority of that time.
But hey, maybe we don't need to derail every single thread on the board with the same nonsense? whaddya think?
Thornton was God awful. Stats are fun though.
Stats are fun, too bad you generally fail to understand them.
GF% is not some predictive stat, it is a way to display results.
God awful Thornton had similar results on the line as Hyman.
Try again.
He didn't though. Don't care what any stats say. I watched nearly every Leafs game. Hyman made an impact, Thornton did not.
If Thornton was so good, why was he pushed down the lineup?
Jumbo had similar results to Hyman. Talk about trolling or being dilutional and high on the Maple Leaf Kool-aid. There is a reason Oilers gave Hyman $40m and Jumbo took his show to Florida for peanuts.
So in your mind, in the thread of potential top 6 LWs , it's derailing to discuss the merits of how one of the guys who potentially could fill that role will fit with the team? Strange.
This thread is discussing who we think should get those spots.
Your post was not discussing that, and an obvious derail into the same shit every other thread has been derailed into.
GF% is not CF%.
They are all the same in terms of relevance to me.
I don't know why you are cursing. Hopefully kids don't read this stuff.
I'm failing to understand how talking about a player's skills (or in this case lack of skills in an area) would be considered off topic.
More off topic is you trying to make this thread about me.
you don't care about goals for and against now?
Try not to drag this thread into the same gutter you guys have dragged every single other thread into this summer, ok?
I made a comment about Ritchie being too slow and then pointed out how players fit differently with different teams.
Then I was accused of derailing. Very ironic.
Yes, of course. But I can see from watching games, who contributes to GF or helps prevents GA.
In this case, the poster tried to claim Thornton and Hyman are equal. That's what the stats they produced say. I say, as a guy who watches more hockey than I care to admit, that if you had a trial for advanced stats and tried to use that comparison as an example of what the stat tells you, the stat would be given a restraining order.