JackSlater
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2010
- 19,763
- 15,387
I don’t disagree that it’s worse on paper, and statistically a team has a better chance with a better roster, but I think all of us are over-discussing this. It’s a short tournament. If the Swedish PP is 50% or the Russian PK is 100%, they probably win. All of the top teams have a chance, and it’s a matter of which country comes together for two weeks and which countries don’t.
Yeah that's all true. The tournament is so short that replacing a great player with a very good player really isn't going to make a big difference for top teams. Even just looking at USA history, when Roenick wasn't available for the 1996 World Cup USA had worse depth than it does now and the team still went out and won the tournament fairly convincingly. Without looking into it I think that the team replaced Roenick, a great player when he was young, with... Smolinski. These things can still work out.
USA is inevitably going to be a talented team with good depth. Losing Eichel makes the team worse but its chances probably only marginally decrease in a one game elimination situation.