I agree 100%. I'm all for team toughness and want to have the team more assertive. It's part of the reason why I'm so high on Ziemmer - he's tough but also skilled.
But there's a narrative JU has put forth that the absence of low-talent enforcers like Englund will stop the teams from playing tough against the Kings.
Bjornfot hasn't had the best camps, but I disagree he's played worse than Englund. Englund tilts the scale in his favor more for providing toughness that Bjornfot doesn't. But it won't be because the Kings "need" Englund. They "need" Bjornfot to play better and he just hasn't separated himself from Englund enough on performance alone.