Forbert looks as advertised…. Terrible
I really can’t gather the energy to be upset about the quality of a pre-season game. These things used to be completely inaccessible.
Hey guys, I missed the first period, who was goodwho was badwho was OK?
Kudryatsev and Karlsson looked decent.... thats about it.Hey guys, I missed the first period, who was good who was bad who was OK?
Forbort looked terrible
His lack of footspeed is alarming. He's good good at defending in his own end, but off the rush he's a massive liabilityForbort looked terrible
IMO - Kudryatsev could be making a case to bump him out of the top six.
Its because the broadcast on canucks.com is the arena jumbotron feed not a tv broadcastOver kill with the Graphics. A replay when the play is going on. Hate when b/c technology is there they feel have to use it.
Lankinien in town 3 days and people be like “ he sucks” jeeez
Two deflected shots go in…goalie critics are in mid season form.Lankinien in town 3 days and people be like “ he sucks” jeeez
Forbort looks legitimately horrible. On the 2-0 goal the problem wasn't that he deflected the puck in, it was that he looked like he was skating in molasses when Ryan Winterton carried the puck in on the zone entry that led to the goal. Danny Dekeyser type stuff if you remember his preseason a couple years ago.
All 3 young defenders had good periods. Felton has a lot more evasiveness and puck skill than his NCAA statline would suggest and has dealt with the forecheck pretty impressively.