Agree to an extent, but you're absolving the coaching and structure too much imo.
Putting a bunch of defensemen on their backhand and asking them to make passes is a terrible coaching decision.
Asking your system, in spite of opposing quick and heavy forechecking systems, to make one of your breakout forwards completely stationary after controlling the puck and ensuring every 'clean' breakout results in a 2-on-5 is a terrible coaching decision. There's not enough for a forecheck, and there's not enough to sustain offensive pressure unless it's Kopitar and he can literally go full running back on 3-5 players.
Going from literal best possession team in the league by several percent to below average despite almost exactly the same personnel is a pretty good visual for how much impact system does have.
My complaints are still the same. There's literally no identity. And I'm way, way less concerned about the 'result' last night because outside of self-inflicted shotgun wounds and a great Gibson peformance that game was pretty even--I'm more concerned about what I saw about how we got there. There's a minimal forecheck, there's a minimal backcheck, there's barely a breakout. The PP looks mostly confused and ineffective, the PK suffers without the presence of Drew Doughty. So we're back to last year--A handful of phenoms in Kopitar, Doughty, and Quick saving Stevens' ass because he couldn't break his way out of a paper bag. Pretty ****ing sick of him saying one thing and then drawing up something else. At least Terry Murray was honest about home plate hockey; stevens is talking bout 'lol we're going to back pressure so fast' and then puts 5 guys between the faceoff dots and red line. That's not player execution. That's visibly coaching/system.