The Albino said:Why exactly would Canada need to win a coin toss, in theory? They had a better record than the Finns, 3-0-0 compared to 2-0-1.
Westlander said:but I don't think the Finns can score the way the Czechs did.
Finn said:Sisu!
No one likes Celin Dion in Canada. That's why she is in Vegas.P_L said:Canada-Finland 1-2. After the game everybody says that it was "a dull and väärin voitettu game". But all the canadians can comfort themselves by listening "the best of Celin Dion".
VanIslander said:Wa...? Before the tourney I scoured the net trying to find non-Finns who thought Finland would be in the final, and found nobody who thought they would go all that way only to lose in the end.
Except me.
Here's evidence of my pre-tourney prediction, Canada wins 4-1 over Finland in the Final, along with extended reasoning as to why.
Just scroll down to the 6th post, dated August 30th:
http://www.eslcafe.com/forums/korea/viewtopic.php?t=20750&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=45
Smoothskater, okay, I admit you might be one of the very small minority who thought likewise. But it's hard to believe because, of over 75,000 who voted in the nhl.com poll before the tourney, under 2% chose Finland to go all the way, and I suspect that most of those were Finns.
Slovakia was the overhyped "longshot" pick; the Swedes and Americans were given a lot of credit for aged star forwards despite the lack of goaltending, I mean, obvious lack. Russia was considered talented but unorganized, yet suddenly received a bandwagon of supporters after the first few games of the tourney, as did Finland after a great start.
The Finns are NOT lucky to be in the final, NO luckier than Canada (and arguably less so). Finland played their game, and did it well. They deserve to be there. Having enough role players is more important than assembling an all-star team, as Canada learned in putting together this year's team.
mattihp said:Finland is a great team, with good players. Canada is a good team with great players. We'll see what matters more.
Yes! Sometimes people forget that a good team is more than the sum of its parts (a bad team, less than).deandebean said:Now Canada has to make itself a great team.
teme said:My quick breakdown:
Goaltending - If Brodeaur plays I say its even, if not, Finns advantage.
Defence - This in early season tournament with insane amount of skill on ice, so it is hardly suprising that defencive play has been less than perfect. Still Canada hasn't really impressed that much here, Finnish dman on the other have mostly looked great which I attribute to solid team effort and confidence on Kipru. Advantage Finns.
Offence - Canada. The big difference is Sakic - Lemieux.
Special teams - Canada, mainly due to a more effective PP. Both Finnish PK and PP units leave lot to be desired.
Intagibles - Finns. They have no real preasure and the Niinimaa/Summanen mess seems to have been overcome, they are perfectly happy being underdogs. Canada has looked nervous, and I don't see that chancing. Reffing is almost always an advantage to the home team, and in this case could be more so on than usual. Still, if the refs just don't call anything, it will favour the Finns because of Canada's better PP.
Sting004 said:Say whaaat? You mean to tell me that Kiprusoff is as good as Brodeur? Not even close. Goaltending will be a huge advantage for Canada if Brodeur plays.
Intangibles - Canada without a doubt. Too much heart and too much character in the dressing room to lose this game. Do the Finns have a Mario Lemieux or Joe Sakic in the room? Not to mention Canada is on home ice.
I think the Finnish fans here are underestimating the team. I know the players definately are not...but you're dealing with the best goaltender in the world by a huge margin (Brodeur..who will most likely be playing), the best defenseman in the NHL, the top two goal scorers, the highest point-producer in the NHL, the mvp of the playoffs, etc etc. It's no surprise right now that they're undefeated...they know how to handle pressure and win big games.
As much as that Czech game scared me, I know tomorrow night you're going to see Canada's best game of the tournament.
Sting004 said:Say whaaat? You mean to tell me that Kiprusoff is as good as Brodeur? Not even close. Goaltending will be a huge advantage for Canada if Brodeur plays.
Intangibles - Canada without a doubt. Too much heart and too much character in the dressing room to lose this game. Do the Finns have a Mario Lemieux or Joe Sakic in the room? Not to mention Canada is on home ice.
I think the Finnish fans here are underestimating the team. I know the players definately are not...but you're dealing with the best goaltender in the world by a huge margin (Brodeur..who will most likely be playing), the best defenseman in the NHL, the top two goal scorers, the highest point-producer in the NHL, the mvp of the playoffs, etc etc. It's no surprise right now that they're undefeated...they know how to handle pressure and win big games.
As much as that Czech game scared me, I know tomorrow night you're going to see Canada's best game of the tournament.