huerter
Registered User
- Aug 16, 2020
- 4,434
- 2,271
Copy and paste and then state (Yes/No) whether you agree after each statement.
Our personnel on PP1 is the ideal group and I largely love the way they operate...
The personnel on PP1 is ideal but I largely wish they operated differently...
Our PP1 personnel is not the ideal group...
Mika is a detriment to PP1 and needs to be removed...
Lafreniere should be on PP1...
Lafreniere has shown proficiency on the PP and that is why I am confident he would improve PP1...
Alignment wise, Lafreniere would fit seamlessly on PP1...
The main reason Lafreniere should be on PP1 is because it would be good for his development...
Panarin is more of a threat on the right side...
Panarin is more of a threat on the left side...
If Mika were out of the lineup, the best choice to take his place would be Chytil over Laf...
Our current PP1 should get used similar to Edmonton where they stay on the ice for as long as they can go instead of being even slightly deferential to PP2...
Our personnel on PP1 is the ideal group and I largely love the way they operate...
The personnel on PP1 is ideal but I largely wish they operated differently...
Our PP1 personnel is not the ideal group...
Mika is a detriment to PP1 and needs to be removed...
Lafreniere should be on PP1...
Lafreniere has shown proficiency on the PP and that is why I am confident he would improve PP1...
Alignment wise, Lafreniere would fit seamlessly on PP1...
The main reason Lafreniere should be on PP1 is because it would be good for his development...
Panarin is more of a threat on the right side...
Panarin is more of a threat on the left side...
If Mika were out of the lineup, the best choice to take his place would be Chytil over Laf...
Our current PP1 should get used similar to Edmonton where they stay on the ice for as long as they can go instead of being even slightly deferential to PP2...
