thethirdhockeyman91
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2018
- 4,569
- 4,641
I think kovalchuk could be involved.I’ll throw one more wrinkle in to think about. Caps had also been scouring the Reign...so, this could be for more than a one for one deal.
I think kovalchuk could be involved.I’ll throw one more wrinkle in to think about. Caps had also been scouring the Reign...so, this could be for more than a one for one deal.
No way in hell is Kovy going to WSH. That contract is awful.This is intriguing, got to think burakovsky would have to be going to kings then.
If Jaskin was about to be waived, why is LA now trading for him?
The Jaskin thing makes no sense. Maybe I just don’t like it.
Seems like LA has better options coming up next year. Don’t need Jaskin taking up space. Guess they can let him walk if needed.
I'm not really sure what Hagelin would do for Washington. He's fast and defensively responsible, but he has literally no offensive talent anymore. For a team that has lost in the playoffs in the past due to not having depth scoring, I'm really not sure why they would want to target Hagelin. I would rather have Jaskin than Hagelin at this point.
Because Jaskin is this incredible provider of offense? Waiting for Jaskin to score is like waiting for rain in Sahara desert. It might happen but maybe not this decade.
Hagelin is the least un-appetizing of all the LA options. That said, I sincerely hope that there are no transactions between Washington and LA.
He offers nothing and will leave you disappointed, hope it isnt him if your kings fanSo looking like Hagelin for Jaskin.... Is Jaskin fast ? What’s the deal with him
This. No thanks to any of those options.Because Jaskin is this incredible provider of offense? Waiting for Jaskin to score is like waiting for rain in Sahara desert. It might happen but maybe not this decade.
Hagelin is the least un-appetizing of all the LA options. That said, I sincerely hope that there are no transactions between Washington and LA.
That isn’t true. I like Jaskin actually but he played a few games next to Ovechkin and Kuznetsov and didn’t produce a thing.No, but he's better than Carl "I can't even produce when playing alongside Evgeni Malkin" Hagelin offensively.
That isn’t true. I like Jaskin actually but he played a few games next to Ovechkin and Kuznetsov and didn’t produce a thing.
Hagelin averaged 9 goals a season over 2 full seasons when playing with Malkin from 2016-2018. Jaskin didn't produce a thing over a couple of games with Ovechkin and Kuznetsov, Hagelin didn't produce a thing over 2 and a half seasons when with Malkin.
Hagelin would just be a really bad buy for the Capitals IMO. He only provides speed and defensive awareness at this point, he provides literally nothing offensively.
I don't think you know who Jaskin is.
Cap's fans also don't need a primer on Hagelin. He is an absolute pain in the ass to play against in the playoffs. Nobody particularly cares how much offense a 4th line winger in providing.
Maybe the deal originally was DSP instead of Jaskin and LA changed their mind?If Jaskin was about to be waived, why is LA now trading for him?
The Jaskin thing makes no sense. Maybe I just don’t like it.
Seems like LA has better options coming up next year. Don’t need Jaskin taking up space. Guess they can let him walk if needed.
What does that do for L.A.?Something around Burakovsky and Toffoli perhaps?
What’s funny is that Jaskin and Hagelin have the same production this year, almost.
Jaskin has 2 goals and 6 assists for 8 points in 36 games
Hagelin has 2 goals and 6 assists for 8 points in 38 games
Unless Jaskin is truly awful in the defensive end, this move would make little sense for the Caps. Jaskin is younger, is an RFA next year for something extremely cheap and produces just as much.
They’d lose Hagelin at the end of the year, has provides absolutely nothing on offense. If this was Hagelin from a couple years ago, this would be a good deal. But he has fallen off of the face of the earth in that regard.
Not sure what either team is thinking if this is the real deal and a 1 for 1 trade.
Thought the King could get a 4th to 5th rounder for Hagelin without bringing in a guy to block their younger guys and to shed salary? Nothing makes sense to me, though.
NoSomething around Burakovsky and Toffoli perhaps?
well first we dont even know if its hagelin or even the kings for that matter
also
makes it seem like multiple pieces
Maybe the player they're getting from the Kings (Clifford) is better than DSP?Maybe the deal originally was DSP instead of Jaskin and LA changed their mind?