Speculation: Potential Coaching Replacements for Jim Montgomery

JCRO

At least I'm safe inside my mind
Sponsor
Mar 8, 2011
9,206
10,775
Only in Boston would we have a coach who is 120-40-15 as Head Coach, a top six with 2 top six players on it and he is the one at risk of being fired NOT the management team...
You’re not wrong at all Coach. But it’s a “what have you done for me lately” kind of league.

This team is unstructured and uninspired. Inconsistency is their mistress. They also have the mental fortitude of a toddler. That last point a cynical fan could argue it be attributed to the coach since we’ve seen flashes of it more than once in his time here.

While it’s not all on Jimbo and his staff, it’s the easiest move to be made especially where this is his last year under contract. Then we’ll really see if it was the team or the coach and go from there.

I think most of us agree that it’s ridiculous to think Sweeney is going to live through a third coaching change and it’s absolutely unfair that he gets another scapegoat. But again, if the change happens at HC and they still suck eggs, well there’s your answer and I think the answer many are expecting.

This situation feels very similar to Claude’s last days here to me. I know at that time I didn’t think he deserved to be fired but I also knew the team was better than they were. Not saying it plays out that way this time. Just drawing lines.
 
Last edited:

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,493
4,861
and soon. Sweeney heading team Canada must be distracting.
Four Nations BS is just that.
I only care about one team, Boston Bruins.
You are so right about this Team Canada crap, why did they need to have a active GM doing that job, you telling, me there are no other qualified hockey guy out there that can do the job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

4ORRBRUIN

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 27, 2005
23,555
18,390
boston
and soon. Sweeney heading team Canada must be distracting.
Four Nations BS is just that.
I only care about one team, Boston Bruins.
Do we really think DS is out their scouting for the 4N team? Like the American team it's a forgone conclusion what those rosters are going to be.

It may be more of a distraction for guys trying to get noticed.

Sweeney will trade before he fires Monty, when he does make coaching changes it will be the entire staff behind the bench in the offseason.

Just me 2 pennies
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

EverettMike

FIRE DON SWEENEY INTO THE SUN
Mar 7, 2009
45,955
35,370
Everett, MA
twitter.com
Can’t operate like that - they might as well replace Monty with the weatherman Phil Connors from Ground Hog Day for the third period

They are destined to go down the drain as is ~ he needs to move on

Monty is a good guy, good coach, but this is like a gazillion relationships where for whatever reason there is no passion - and without passion you are 8-8-2

Sweeney needs to act asap they aren’t even a quarter in but as Yogi Berra said ‘it’s getting late, early’

I agree, but that doesn't mean he won't consider that/isn't considering that.
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,382
11,724
1. Im GM I need to know if it was this coach

2. Sacco temp ~ I’ll find my coach in offseason when assistant coaches are available and pool of head coaches is expanded

I’ll grocery shop at Whole Foods or Wegmans not White Hen Pantry or Seven Eleven, thank you

3. Jan 1 I’ve just had 6 weeks and 20 games without Monty

38 down and 44 to go

A. What’s our position
B. How we playing
C. Good place and add or hopeless and subtract

Steps need to be taken
The GM should know it's him.
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,493
4,861
Makes me sick to defend Don Sweeney, but there's a chance being the Team Canada GM for 4N is actually good for the Bruins. He might be personally watching even more hockey and doing more pro scouting himself than he would have otherwise.
Nice spin, I don't believe it, but that does not make you wrong.
 

EverettMike

FIRE DON SWEENEY INTO THE SUN
Mar 7, 2009
45,955
35,370
Everett, MA
twitter.com
Nice spin, I don't believe it, but that does not make you wrong.

It's not spin. And literally no one is less interested in defending Don Sweeney than your old pal EM. It just seems to me it has an equal chance of being good as it does of being a distraction.

It's not like he's the GM for Team Finland and is now dedicating time to watching some European league. Literally every player he is considering for Team Canada plays in the NHL where the Bruins also play.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hookslide

ODAAT

Registered User
Oct 17, 2006
52,691
21,603
Victoria BC
logic says the B`s likely to go with Sacco or Leach if and when Monty gets the boot, your thoughts on this would be appreciated

Sacco/Leach assessment

- Areas you think he could inject energy in the B`s?
- system either choose to go with or status quo?
- will/would each allow the players to focus less on systems offensively and more on instinct?
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,493
4,861
logic says the B`s likely to go with Sacco or Leach if and when Monty gets the boot, your thoughts on this would be appreciated

Sacco/Leach assessment

- Areas you think he could inject energy in the B`s?
- system either choose to go with or status quo?
- will/would each allow the players to focus less on systems offensively and more on instinct?
When Monty goes, they all should go. I am not saying Monty should not be shit canned, but in fairness to him, he has no one on his staff that was his guy.
 

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,540
37,634
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
logic says the B`s likely to go with Sacco or Leach if and when Monty gets the boot, your thoughts on this would be appreciated

Sacco/Leach assessment

- Areas you think he could inject energy in the B`s?
- system either choose to go with or status quo?
- will/would each allow the players to focus less on systems offensively and more on instinct?
The defensive system is all Sacco, has been since the Julien days. Both Cassidy and Montgomery made minor adjustments to the breakout, but the defensive system is still the same. Both Cassidy and Montgomery have spoken about it in the past, yet it fails to stick with some people here.

It's an execution issue.

As for the offence, a lot has to change. They aren't generating much of anything off the rush and they wanted to improve that. If they aren't scoring dirty goals, they are going to have trouble scoring.

That again is execution but is also a systems issue as far as I am concerned.
 

Mione134

Queen in the North
Sponsor
Mar 30, 2010
39,407
44,309
Hogwarts-617
The defensive system is all Sacco, has been since the Julien days. Both Cassidy and Montgomery made minor adjustments to the breakout, but the defensive system is still the same. Both Cassidy and Montgomery have spoken about it in the past, yet it fails to stick with some people here.

It's an execution issue.

As for the offence, a lot has to change. They aren't generating much of anything off the rush and they wanted to improve that. If they aren't scoring dirty goals, they are going to have trouble scoring.

That again is execution but is also a systems issue as far as I am concerned.
They need to clean house, imo
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thirty Seven

ODAAT

Registered User
Oct 17, 2006
52,691
21,603
Victoria BC
The defensive system is all Sacco, has been since the Julien days. Both Cassidy and Montgomery made minor adjustments to the breakout, but the defensive system is still the same. Both Cassidy and Montgomery have spoken about it in the past, yet it fails to stick with some people here.

It's an execution issue.

As for the offence, a lot has to change. They aren't generating much of anything off the rush and they wanted to improve that. If they aren't scoring dirty goals, they are going to have trouble scoring.

That again is execution but is also a systems issue as far as I am concerned.
thx Dom, noticed way too often and I think your guest Mike Eagles alluded to it as well that the forwards are so bloody slow coming back to give the D men a target to begin the breakout which helps generate that speed through the neutral zone.

This team was a bit of a mess before the Peaks/Hampus injuries, now Kastelic, not sure what happened to Monty`s attitude of the first two years where he seemed to , offensively , let the boys skills take over and not focus solely on a system or set plays outside of the PP.

Either way, such a disappointing first quarter of the season

They need to clean house, imo
not opposed to it but unlikely during the season I would think
 

Thirty Seven

Registered User
Jan 23, 2017
1,748
3,294
They need to clean house, imo
If the goal is to tank then Sacco is the guy you want. It's the only positive thing Avs fans were saying about him. If they want to try and compete then I agree, I just imagine it's difficult to do so mid season.
 

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,540
37,634
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
When Monty goes, they all should go. I am not saying Monty should not be shit canned, but in fairness to him, he has no one on his staff that was his guy.
Monty was given the option. He has spoken about it. He chose to keep the assistant coaches.

Sweeney allows the coaches to make the decisions as it should be.

Heck, Sweeney even allowed Bruce Cassidy to fire Kevin Dean just before, you know, Neely told Sweeney he had to fire Cassidy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thirty Seven

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,493
4,861
Monty was given the option. He has spoken about it. He chose to keep the assistant coaches.

Sweeney allows the coaches to make the decisions as it should be.

Heck, Sweeney even allowed Bruce Cassidy to fire Kevin Dean just before, you know, Neely told Sweeney he had to fire Cassidy.
If that is true and I believe you know that to be true, then that supports my thoughts that if Monty goes then clean house with the coaching staff.
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,382
11,724
logic says the B`s likely to go with Sacco or Leach if and when Monty gets the boot, your thoughts on this would be appreciated

Sacco/Leach assessment

- Areas you think he could inject energy in the B`s?
- system either choose to go with or status quo?
- will/would each allow the players to focus less on systems offensively and more on instinct?
It was a long time ago and guys can improve, but Avs fans absolutely hated Sacco.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thirty Seven

DominicT

Registered User
Sep 6, 2009
20,540
37,634
Stratford Ontario
dom.hockey
If that is true and I believe you know that to be true, then that supports my thoughts that if Monty goes then clean house with the coaching staff.
I'm not disagreeing with you. I just disagree with the "it's not his staff" part.

Should they go? Absolutely. I have been very vocal that it should have happened 2 years ago.

Montgomery led the Blues special teams to top 10 finishes and if I recall, the PP was second in the NHL.

Did he forget all of a sudden how to coach? I don't think so. I think he has lost the room.
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,493
4,861
I'm not disagreeing with you. I just disagree with the "it's not his staff" part.

Should they go? Absolutely. I have been very vocal that it should have happened 2 years ago.

Montgomery led the Blues special teams to top 10 finishes and if I recall, the PP was second in the NHL.

Did he forget all of a sudden how to coach? I don't think so. I think he has lost the room.
Unfortunately, I think you might be right about him losing the room, but also think there are so many other obstacles, that this team has had this year, Marchands surgery which was failed to be mentioned, even after Sweeney said the team did not need any surgeries in the season, Swaymans contract, and now even Monty's contract, players missing camp,, and bringing in so many new players. I just am very frustrated, and I can only imagine how the players feel. Solutions, plural?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad