Speculation: Potential Coaching Replacements for Jim Montgomery

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,288
24,180
I believe prior to the last two games the Bs were said to be slated against only 3 playoff teams from last year in the next 15 games.

I think your timeline is right.

It’s not an if it’s happening to me anymore. It’s when.

The next 13 games, what would be a reasonable expectation that would save Monty from the unemployment line?

.500 in points % as they've done so far is not going to cut it. Say he goes 6-6-1 or 5-5-3, that's not good enough IMO.

I would think a points % above .600 would be the bare minimum. (to give that context, there are 12 teams right now with points % above .600). So call it 16 points, he would need to go 8-5-0 or 7-4-2 at minimum. Even 6-3-4 probably ends with him getting canned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,368
11,679
You know what he was saying, don't try and change it. Up 3-1 and put injured players in when not needed, that was stupid.
I'm not changing it up, I'm saying that the often repeated narrative is factually wrong. And even the parts of it that are right are highly reductive. It's the biggest canard I've seen outside a Michelin star restaurant in Paris.

You name one coach that's going to sit out the captain of the team, in his last year, when he comes to you and says that he's well enough to play. "Sorry Patrice... we really have to go with Charlie Coyle. Sure he only has 1 pt in 4 games, but we've won 3 of those and boy he's just better than you are right now." Imagine if they still lose the series and Patrice comes out after the fact and says he asked in and Monty didn't let him. Oh I'm sure the narrative would totally be that Monty did the right thing to keep him out. Complete BS.

I wonder if Maurice screwed up putting Duclair and Ekblad back into the series even though they were still not 100% or Barkov?
 

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,435
4,798
I'm not changing it up, I'm saying that the often repeated narrative is factually wrong. And even the parts of it that are right are highly reductive. It's the biggest canard I've seen outside a Michelin star restaurant in Paris.

You name one coach that's going to sit out the captain of the team, in his last year, when he comes to you and says that he's well enough to play. "Sorry Patrice... we really have to go with Charlie Coyle. Sure he only has 1 pt in 4 games, but we've won 3 of those and boy he's just better than you are right now." Imagine if they still lose the series and Patrice comes out after the fact and says he asked in and Monty didn't let him. Oh I'm sure the narrative would totally be that Monty did the right thing to keep him out. Complete BS.

I wonder if Maurice screwed up putting Duclair and Ekblad back into the series even though they were still not 100% or Barkov?
First words out of Bergerons, mouth after they got eliminated, "I have a disc in my back " Zacha and Coyle were playing well, rest might not have cured him, but playing certainly did not help, Krecji and Ullmark, both should not have played. In my opinion the players made the call to play, and Monty, did not stand up to them.
 

bp14

Registered User
Mar 17, 2022
362
906
Bruins head out west for nearly two weeks on December 8th. A 5 game road trip through Winnipeg, Seattle, Calgary, Edmonton, and Vancouver.

Prior to that trip they have 13 games against mediocre opponents. St. Louis and Detroit twice. Along with Dallas, Columbus, Utah, Vancouver, Islanders, Pittsburgh, Montreal, Philadelphia and Chicago.

If they can't get this ship back on track in those 13 games, I seriously doubt Monty will be going on that trip out west.
I’m sorry but that’s way too long to wait.

They lead the league penalties, bottom of the league in special teams. He’s changed lines nightly, called out players and benched his top forward. All that and they got no shots in the third period of a tie game at home just last night.

Its time. Like him or not, fair or not, this team isn’t executing or giving off any impression that it’s trying to.

New coach. Move a core player. Shake it up.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,288
24,180
I’m sorry but that’s way too long to wait.

They lead the league penalties, bottom of the league in special teams. He’s changed lines nightly, called out players and benched his top forward. All that and they got no shots in the third period of a tie game at home just last night.

Its time. Like him or not, fair or not, this team isn’t executing or giving off any impression that it’s trying to.

New coach. Move a core player. Shake it up.

I agree, just saying realistically speaking the way the schedule plays out a decision will be made on him before that western trip if things don't turn around.

If he loses 4 or 5 of the next 6 or 7 then he'll probably get canned sooner.

I just can't see them having a mediocre stretch here and not having a new voice heading out on that long two-week trip.

Sadly I think the "new voice" will be in house regardless. Leach maybe but most likely Sacco.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,288
24,180
With an interim tag.

Maybe, although if they go with Sacco I can see it being a permanent hire. He was "promoted" this year to associate coach.

Wasn't Cassidy offered the job outright when he was promoted from Providence in 2017?

Bruins historically haven't gone with interim coaches often. The only one I can think of was MOC when he himself canned Ftorek.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr Hook

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,559
22,006
Tyler, TX
Maybe, although if they go with Sacco I can see it being a permanent hire. He was "promoted" this year to associate coach.

Wasn't Cassidy offered the job outright when he was promoted from Providence in 2017?

Bruins historically haven't gone with interim coaches often. The only one I can think of was MOC when he himself canned Ftorek.
Ugh, I hope not. Hasn't he been running the PP for however many years now and it's been meh at best and is currently a flaming pile of shit?
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,288
24,180
Ugh, I hope not. Hasn't he been running the PP for however many years now and it's been meh at best and is currently a flaming pile of shit?

Didn't they shift responsibilities around last year and take Sacco off the PP duty?

I'm guessing Leach coaches the D, other than that I don't know who does what anymore on the Bruins bench between Monty/Sacco/Kelly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff and Dr Hook

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,368
11,679
Maybe, although if they go with Sacco I can see it being a permanent hire. He was "promoted" this year to associate coach.

Wasn't Cassidy offered the job outright when he was promoted from Providence in 2017?

Bruins historically haven't gone with interim coaches often. The only one I can think of was MOC when he himself canned Ftorek.
I can't imagine they'd possibly name him as anything other than interim. If they start looking great and the first 30-40 games with him look great, sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinDust

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
25,288
24,180
I can't imagine they'd possibly name him as anything other than interim. If they start looking great and the first 30-40 games with him look great, sure.

I would think so too but I just don't know with this front office. Also depends on what direction do they see the team headed. Fact is, most times you see interim coaches promoted from within, they are just place-holders on teams expecting to bottom out and sell off at the deadline, knowing they are about to see massive changes in the off-season, including a new permanent coach.

If they can Monty in the next 3-4 weeks it's being done to try and save the season, not bottom out.

Honestly if I had to put my money down on a likely scenario, it's that Monty gets fired between now and December 8th, and Sacco is promoted to the permanent head coach.
 

DKH

Worst Poster/Awful Takes
Feb 27, 2002
76,657
57,688
You know what he was saying, don't try and change it. Up 3-1 and put injured players in when not needed, that was stupid.
Bruins dominated games 3 & 4 in Florida by a 10-4 score

The box scores show the centers as
Zacha
Coyle

No Bergeron or Krejci

Krejci led all F in game 1 a 3-1 Bruins win but was injured in game 2 a 6-3 loss and did not play along with Bergeron in games 3 and 4

Without their two iconic franchise centers the Bruins dominated the kittens and had them on the ropes until Coach Jim Montgomery let his guard down making several questionable player and lineup changes over games 5 and 6 costing the Bruins

Yikes

There you go
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Gordoff

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,435
4,798
Bruins dominated games 3 & 4 in Florida by a 10-4 score

The box scores show the centers as
Zacha
Coyle

No Bergeron or Krejci

Did the Bruins beat the Panthers without them ?
I think we are agreeing, but one of us is not seeing it.
 

Lord Ahriman

Registered User
Oct 21, 2009
6,745
2,066
I would think so too but I just don't know with this front office. Also depends on what direction do they see the team headed. Fact is, most times you see interim coaches promoted from within, they are just place-holders on teams expecting to bottom out and sell off at the deadline, knowing they are about to see massive changes in the off-season, including a new permanent coach.

If they can Monty in the next 3-4 weeks it's being done to try and save the season, not bottom out.

Honestly if I had to put my money down on a likely scenario, it's that Monty gets fired between now and December 8th, and Sacco is promoted to the permanent head coach.

That would be disgusting: Sacco is the guy that should have been fired long ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BruinDust

CellyHard

Registered User
May 27, 2012
1,217
2,198
Massachusetts
Looking at the next 13 games going into December....the Bruins face only 2 teams with a winning record (Stars and Canucks)

They could really separate themselves from the pack and they likely should. They have the talent to beat most of these teams

I get they're going to have their off nights but is it crazy to suggest they get 20 points in this span?

Blues (x2), Wings (x2), CBJ, Utah, Islanders, Penguins, Canadiens, Blackhawks, Flyers

There is no easy game but this is the easiest it will get for them
 

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad