Garon is a proven, veteran NHL backup. Scrivens isn't. And Scrivens quite frankly isn't very good. I'll take Garon any day.
Perhaps, but I guessthat depends on what you classify as proven.
Yes, Garon has a lengthier career, but Scrivens is coming off the better season. The last time Garon posted a above average save percentage was 2007-2008. He's hovered around .900 ever since.
I'm not sure if you seen Scrivens in Toronto or not, but I did. The guy is cool as a cucumber and has very good reflexes and timing. I've said it before, I'll say it again, I thnk he has the upside of a Dwayne Roloson. I think you give Garon the crdit he deserved about a decade ago and underrate Scrivens oticaby.
From Kopitars recent performances it looks like his fear of the goal net is gone. He's look great.
It's not January yet. He'll come back around for his usual one month off in the middle of the season.
Poor Doughty...also good-bye Schultz?
Or Schultz is likely in and Sutter wanted to give Ellerby one last look.
That said, I agree with you, Schultz seems like the odd man out.
Buncha people who know JACK about goaltending. YOU come in to a game cold.
If every backup came into a game and immediately allowed a goal, how long would they be a backup for?
It's unfair to have to come in cold, I agree, but that's the role of a backup and if you can't get away from using the excuse of "I was cold" each time you let in a goal as a backup, you won' be the backup for very long.
I'm far from blindly supporting him. But to me, to have nearly an entire fan base want a player to be traded after one bad year and while that player is still young and can turn it around is crazy.
Nearly the entire fanbase based on what poll? That's your own opinion, not a fact. If anything, I think most of the fanbase here defended through last season despte his struggles, not wanted him traded.
Maybe you're thinking of Dwight King?
I swear, there was probably
10 to 15 of us in section 16 that gave off a very audible "oh, ****" when Mitchell blocked that shot and started limping. Scary.
You know what, though, Lombardi put the defense in a position in which if Mitchell goes down we're looking pretty thin back there. I still don't think everyone really grasps how different the D will look without Scuderi back there this year. It's sink or swim with Mitchell's shotty health this year. Regher and Greene are sort of redundant, big and physical but slow and prone to exposure. Doughty and Voynov are studs, sure, and Martinez is looking good. Past that the depth is pretty abysmal.
Wouldn't surprise me at all to see Dean go hard after a top four defenseman at the deadline this year.
How are pretty thin?
Doughty-Muzzin
Regehr-Martinez
Greene-Ellerby
Schultz
It's not a terrible blueline. I mean we rolled with arguably a worse blueline last year (had Scuderi but no Greene and no Regehr for most of the season) and we did well. The defensive numbers will only get better if Quick plays like Quick can during the regular season this year.