thestonedkoala
Going Dark
- Aug 27, 2004
- 28,343
- 1,626
If you're talking about mine I fail to see how saying Spurgeon is the most likely of the four to be back is preposterous.
Actually I think it's the money
If you're talking about mine I fail to see how saying Spurgeon is the most likely of the four to be back is preposterous.
If you're talking about mine I fail to see how saying Spurgeon is the most likely of the four to be back is preposterous.
That's not what you said.
Not sure what you're getting at with this. If you're talking about the money for Spurgeon part of my statement, I don't think around $2 million a year for him is out of the question. $2.5 at an absolute max (though I certainly hope he doesn't get that much). He's a capable puck mover who will put up 25-30 points in a full season and is sound defensively, though not physically.
Guaranteeing Backstrom, Cullen, and Clutterbuck are all gone for next year.
I don't think Spurgeon gets more than $1.75m.
Considering the recent news that Philly WILL NOT be buying out Bryz, I'm curious to see why they're still pursuing Bernier so hard. My only guess is they would roll with him and Bryz, and if Bernier outperforms Bryz this coming season, then he gets bought out next off-season using their other amnesty buyout (it's been confirmed that Briere will be bought out after the finals end).
Five teams that sources indicate are in the mix on Bernier, to varying degrees: the Philadelphia Flyers, Toronto Maple Leafs, New York Islanders, Minnesota Wild and Florida Panthers.
For the Wild, it really depends on what happens with pending UFA netminder Niklas Backtrom. If they can sign him in short order, then they would bow out of the Bernier mix. But if it appears they can’t re-sign Backstrom, they can go harder after Bernier or other possible netminders.
Why the **** would GMCF do that? He's not dumb.I'd laugh if Fletcher traded a guy like Zucker for Bernier.
I'd laugh if Fletcher traded a guy like Zucker for Bernier.
Why would we want Bernier ? And isn't Philly buying out Briere and Bryzgalov.
NopeHard to believe they're buying out Briere over Bryzgalov, and doesn't the player have to agree to the buyout ?
Why the **** would GMCF do that? He's not dumb.
FORWARDS
Zach Parise ($7.538m) / Mikko Koivu ($6.750m) / Jason Pominville ($4.505m)
Jason Zucker ($0.833m) / Charlie Coyle ($0.975m) / Devin Setoguchi ($3.000m)
Mikael Granlund ($2.100m) / Kyle Brodziak ($2.833m) / Dany Heatley ($7.500m)
Torrey Mitchell ($1.900m) / Zenon Konopka ($0.925m) / Cal Clutterbuck ($2.250m)
Stephane Veilleux ($0.588m) /
DEFENSEMEN
Ryan Suter ($7.538m) / Jonas Brodin ($1.444m)
Marco Scandella ($1.025m) / Tom Gilbert ($4.000m)
Clayton Stoner ($1.050m) / Jared Spurgeon ($1.600m)
Nate Prosser ($0.825m) /
GOALTENDERS
Josh Harding ($1.900m)
Niklas Backstrom ($3.500m)
OTHER
Buyout: Mark Parrish ($0.928m)
Buyout: Mike Rupp ($0.000m)
------
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(these totals are compiled with the bonus cushion)
SALARY CAP: $64,300,000; CAP PAYROLL: $65,958,034; BONUSES: $1,825,000
CAP SPACE (22-man roster): $166,966
That defense looks mighty thin, especially if there is an injury.
Also I feel like we're rehashing DR's day as GM where we are putting players in position to fail, not to succeed (Coyle at center) due to having very little flexibility.
Bryzgalov isn't the problem with Philly. They could make nearly any goaltender they employ look bad.
Coyle is a center...
Exactly! Goaltending is horribly overrated. Bryzgalov was brilliant under Tippett and very good under Carlyle. Is there any surprise he puts up terrible numbers behind that defense? They dump Bobrovsky off to Columbus and then he turns around and wins the Vezina. HELLO? It's the defense, not the goalie!
In pro hockey you still change for your position, but once you’re out there you’re generally just a forward, with a starting designation on faceoffs, and a lane to cover in your neutral zone defense.
What I mean is, everything is “F1, F2, and F3.”
Once you get the puck, any thought of positioning outside of “keep a guy high” is basically thrown out the window.
On defense, it’s not necessarily the center who goes down low, as is often thought. It’s supposed to be whoever is back in the d-zone first, F1.
Strongly disagree. The goalie is like the pitcher in baseball, he can single handedly Win or Lose a game for a team. No doubt the goalie's numbers are affected by the players and system, but IMO you are hugely and grossly underestimating the value of goaltending and the value of having a superior Goalie. So Rask, Lundquiust, and Quick are nothing special, just products of their D?
I agree with Gretz when he throws out the cliche - "you build a Championship Team from the goal out."
No, but a lot of his trades are about trading long term potential for short term gains. If he truly believes that goaltending is his number 1 priority in the off-season and doesn't see us retaining Backstrom or getting a solid starter for cheap on the market, he might covet Bernier, as he could be the best starter out on the market. Given the rumors out of Philadelphia (Matt Read, Sean Courturier, 1st round pick) and New York, Minnesota doesn't have a lot of viable trade chips that would entice Los Angeles. If GMCF sees Minnesota being a goaltender away from competing for the playoffs annually, he might let Zucker go and pray that he can retain both Seto and Poms long term but that won't be until next year and next year's problems shouldn't be today's problems. Today's problems is getting a goaltender.