He alone won’t be the difference in carrying a team which has only won two playoff games in franchise history all the way to hoisting the Cup next year. .
What does winning "only" 2 playoff games in franchise history have to do with the 2015/16 Columbus Blue Jackets? A good amount of people ("professionals", hf fans, myself) had pretty high hopes or expectations for the 14/15 CBJ. This was just after those 2 playoff wins and just before an absurd amount of injuries to key key players. Saad isn't the "answer". He isn't being asked or expected to be.
I’m not saying that Saad won’t be an instrumental part of CBJ winning a Cup in the future. Columbus is shaping up to look good for awhile. But this poll is about winning the 2016 Cup, I’m assuming. And generally, teams will need to gain experience in a deep playoff run first before winning the Cup.
Whats the difference between saying the CBJ
could win the cup next year or that they
will win in the future? The team built right now has just as good of a chance to win it all then they do in the "future". People wanna get hyped up on our prospects and Johansen, but we'd be very lucky for a collective of our prospects to end up as effective as our "veterans"(Dubi, Foligno, Hartnell, JJ, Tyutin). This is without mentioning the often underappreciated Atkinson, Calvert, Savard(and now) Murray. And while its true that
generally teams have a deep playoff run before they win it all, it is not a need. While our team might be somewhat lacking in playoff experience, the way the team is built and plays, playoff experience isn't gonna be what gets us over the hump. As has been mentioned, all it takes is to make the playoffs in the NHL. How many "deep runs" that led to future "stanley cup success" were looked at as "not likely"?
Also, DEFENSE is what usually wins championships, so it’s not a good idea to just brush aside Columbus’ current defense issues.
Our top 4 of Johnson, Murray, Savard and Tyutin is starting to get really underappreciated. While its true there's no "true 2 way #1" d man, Jack Johnson has offensive abilities that I think can be, and seems to be at this point, very overlooked. Preferably you'd want him paired up with a vastly superior defensive defenseman, but he is a top pairing defenseman. Despite what some may believe, the all around games of both Murray and Savard, are something that many teams would love to have added to their defense. Again, preferably you'd have these guys paired up with 2008 Zdeno Chara, but most teams in the league would be perfectly fine(depth chart/pairing wise) with these guys as a #2 playing in practically any situation. With Tyutin and primarily his above average defensive he fits on just about any teams top 4 and regular pk units. And frankly if/when Connauton struggles, I'd like to see Tyutin get some games on the pp. What we really need is a
completely defensively responsible defenseman. He could put up 40 points or 4 and he could have the same impact on the team. We need a guy that can be matched up with 1 of the other 4 guys above on the pk or at the end of every period. It doesn't need to be a 20 min a night guy. It just needs to be better than Leopold/Schultz/Aucoin etc.