MeHateHe
Registered User
- Dec 24, 2006
- 2,851
- 3,278
More people were dying in non-hockey countries from prominent IIHF members (at least prominent now). War in Ukraine is ongoing so anything is possible (unfortunately) but Vietnam far surpasses it in life lost (and even losses of neighbouring countries from American bombing).
I'm sure the analogies between a naked land grab that is threatening to destabilize nearly a century of European peace and plunge the entire world into a war and the blundering invasion of a Soviet proxy by a terrified US made sense when Tucker explained them to you, but if you read my post you'll see I suggested viewing this through context. The sanctions exist to get Putin to stop, both because he's killing Ukrainian civilians and because Germans, Poles, Czechs and the rest are nervous that they're next.More people were dying in non-hockey countries from prominent IIHF members (at least prominent now). War in Ukraine is ongoing so anything is possible (unfortunately) but Vietnam far surpasses it in life lost (and even losses of neighbouring countries from American bombing).
I think it's fine to sanction Russia, I also think the US probably should have been sanctioned by the IIHF during their invasions in the 2000s.
I'm glad that you think that American imperialism under Bush (primarily) was a problem. I'm curious if you said so at the time, or if it's just more convenient for you to support Russia now. Myself, I opposed the invasion of Iraq and anything more than a targeted campaign in Afghanistan. The failure of the international community to act appropriately then is not an excuse for them to fail to act now.