Nice analogy. I'm rooting for you to be right but something tells me naw.
More like me being sarcastic and hoping it's right like you. There is a chance but there are a few things that concern me with the coaching style. We made a coaching change but it's still the same system and I feel it's not right for the tools we have.
1) We suck on faceoffs. This hurts even more cause we also struggle at puck possession which leads to #2..
2) We lack puck possession beasts. Petry is the only one that can carry it and not loose it when he gets contact.
3) We turn the puck over way too much in our own end. I would love to see the amount of goals that we allowed because of this. I know all teams are vulnerable to this but I feel we are near the bottom.
4) Puck battles. I'm not seeing us win too many battles in the trenches. Adding Toffoli and Anderson helps but it's still an issue.
5) We try to circle back too much to move forward with the "flying V". I get that strategy cause all teams try it but we don't have the tools to move the puck like that and we make stupid passes to a player close by who is already covered. I rather see us spread out a bit more and have one of the wingers float around near their D. This way, our D can chip it out and it might work better with our transition game cause the other teams D will have a forward near by they have to worry about. I think we are making it way to easy to counter our attack by having too many of our players close together.
6) Play a north south game. Not east west. Get the puck out of our zone and into theirs. Then we can use our forecheck attack which is decent.
I think they work on several areas and I think we will be better. Question is how much better. If we limit the garbage turnovers, I think we do well.