ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 78,290
- 45,509
Keefe doesn't match lines, it's hard.Does this mean that B-M-M matches up with the Point line? And if so, do you think they can handle it alright?
Keefe doesn't match lines, it's hard.Does this mean that B-M-M matches up with the Point line? And if so, do you think they can handle it alright?
Huh?? Coaching is ALL about matching lines in game. Not sure what you mean is hard, coaches primary job is to match lines.Keefe doesn't match lines, it's hard.
Keefe doesn't match lines, it's hard.
I think he's referring to the Montreal series where Keefe made zero effort to get Matthews away from the Danault line.Source? Was it the quote about him not being worried about line matching that everyone blew out of proportion?
I think he's referring to the Montreal series where Keefe made zero effort to get Matthews away from the Danault line.
No Danault's line limited Matthew's line enough to win. They did the same against vegas. neither Keefe or Deboer made any effort to get their stars away from danault. Then game 1 of the Tampa series, Cooper does everything to avoid that matchup- plays his big liner against Suzuki which had the double benefit of forcing Mtls best offensive players to play D and chase all night and get them away from Danault.I doubt he is referring to that series, he is smarter than that.
Matthews' line dominated Danault's.
Price just dominated them.
No Danault's line limited Matthew's line enough to win. They did the same against vegas. neither Keefe or Deboer made any effort to get their stars away from danault. Then game 1 of the Tampa series, Cooper does everything to avoid that matchup- plays his big liner against Suzuki which had the double benefit of forcing Mtls best offensive players to play D and chase all night and get them away from Danault.
On paper the Leafs are probably significantly better than Tampa but Cooper>>>>>>Keefe. That plus if Vasi steals a couple - ouch
Bang on, I'd sayWhich 20 do you see Keefe dressing for Game 1?
Assuming 12 - 6, I see.......
Forwards
Matthews Marner Tavares ROR
Nylander Jarnkrok Bunting Kerfoot
Acciari ZAR Kampf Lafferty
Defense
Brodie McCabe
Rielly Schenn
Giordano Holl
Samsonov
Woll
That might be the lineup if they get to Bos. Probably with Willy and Marner switchefThis will never happen but…
Bunting. Matthews Nylander
Jamkrok Tavares Marner
Kerfoot ROR acciardi
Zar Kampf lafferty
Mcabe Brodiie
Reilly schenn
Gio liljegrin
Agreed. It must be some psychological plan in terms of "toughness" to uplift our team?I saw them both. One timely goal (his only point in 15 games!) doesn't make him a second pair defenseman. Mashing guys and giving the puck right back accomplishes nothing. He's constantly getting hemmed in his own zone and contributes negatively in the other two zones.
Schenn 5v5 has: 42% CF%. 43.6% FF%. 45.5% GF%. 46.5% xGF%. Those ratios are all propped up on the offensive side by playing with top tier forwards; his defensive numbers are crap. Only Gustafsson has worse and he is getting scratched for good reason. And you'll never guess who's second worst of the regular D... hint, it's his D partner. If you're that convinced he's a great physical D then at least stick him on the third pair like when we had Bogosian (who was twice the player and actually could play within his limits).
It's genuinely baffling what Keefe sees with this pairing. It was a funny retro joke experiment for a game or two but should have been tossed in the trash immediately after that.
YUP, and Lily is a great option to have as a 7th guy.Liljegren's play over the past month+ has Holl and Schenn in the lineup, not loyalty.
He simply hasn't been good enough.
For Game 1 it's the correct call.
If a line generates a ton of high-quality scoring chances but doesn't score, who is doing their job to keep the puck out of the net? The goalie or the players?
Its a crazy narrative that will never go away for some reason.