What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerIn Game 6 of the 2010 Final the Flyers’ tying goal went in off of Hossa and until the game winner that’s the most I’ve believed in cursesHossa was traded to Pittsburgh and lost in the Final to Detroit. Then signed a 1 year in Detroit and lost in the Final to Pittsburgh lol.
He got his satisfaction later, but still a funny story.
Norm Ullman is a sad case.
Joins the Red Wings in 1956, one year after they completed their 4 Cups in 6 years. Plays in Detroit through 1967 and joins the Maple Leafs one season after their final Cup run of the 1960s.
If there were a Stanley Cup for pornstaches...Tough to use guys like Gartner for this. If a guy gets traded because the team doesn't think they can win the Cup with him, or that the guy they get in return will help them more, did he miss on the Cup? Especially for a Gartner, who was dealt 70 games into the season. Unless the player asks out, that's an issue with any trade though.
The fun one would be Scott Stevens. Wanted to stay in St.Louis, didn't want to go to NJ, but forced to. In July 1994, days after leading the Devils to the 2nd best record and the league and an all-time great conference final series against the Rangers, still signed an offer sheet to go back to St.Louis, only to be matched by the Devils. Then, in 94-95, of course the Devils win the Cup, followed by 2 more. He won multiple Cups in spite of himself. Maybe he still wins some in St.Louis, but we'll never know.
They never would've won with him, he didn't miss the window, he was one of the biggest reasons they couldn't win and Tkachuk was instrumental to the win. Doesn't really apply here IMO.Jonathan Huberdeau
This was the first thing that popped in my headHossa was traded to Pittsburgh and lost in the Final to Detroit. Then signed a 1 year in Detroit and lost in the Final to Pittsburgh lol.
He got his satisfaction later, but still a funny story.
I hate this narrative. This is incorrect. One of the better players on the team was not a reason why they didn't win. A player who lead the team in scoring in a playoff run (Barkov hadn't done that when Huberdeau was there) was not a reason why they couldn't get over the hump.They never would've won with him, he didn't miss the window, he was one of the biggest reasons they couldn't win and Tkachuk was instrumental to the win. Doesn't really apply here IMO.
Maybe Blake Wheeler applies here ?
Genuine question, you think the Panthers win the cup if you guys had Huberdeau instead of Tkachuk ? I don't, I don't think you even make the cup final.I hate this narrative. This is incorrect. One of the better players on the team was not a reason why they didn't win. A player who lead the team in scoring in a playoff run (Barkov hadn't done that when Huberdeau was there) was not a reason why they couldn't get over the hump.
The organization was not a Stanley Cup winning organization when he was there. Huberdeau himself was not worse than every player on the team at the time of them winning the cup. There are a whole of lot reasons why they didn't win the cup when Huberdeau was here, and Huberdeau wasn't one of them.
As I've said before, a big reason why they stepped up to a higher level was the coaching change. They are not winning that cup with Brunette as the coach. Even with Tkachuk in the lineup.
Yes, yes I do. The team structure and attention to detail changes with the coach. This team went through several different coaches and several different versions of itself with Huberdeau in the lineup. With various degrees of success.Genuine question, you think the Panthers win the cup if you guys had Huberdeau instead of Tkachuk ? I don't, I don't think you even make the cup final.
I have never been impressed by Huberdeau even when he was racking up points in Florida, he would do nothing all game and you check the stat sheet and he somehow has 2 points.
Maurice definitely gets a lot of credit, but it was a game 7, one goal win for the cup. I don't think that happens if you switch Tkachuk for Huberdeau.
I feel like with a lot of these, would the team have still won with the player? Would Tampa have won with Callahan (a 3rd liner at that point in his career) making nearly $6m on the cap?Ryan Callahan is my contribution to this thread.
Forced into retirement after the 2018-19 season, then the Bolts went on to win back to back cups without him.![]()
This one too.I don't think Panthers win the Cup if they don't make that trade.
They definitely dont win with his albatross. Would've meant no Richards or CarterRyan Smyth got cap dumped back to Edmonton and the Kings won the Cup that year.