Using your own logic, you think we should stop having good goalies because they are a crutch for the team but we shouldn’t force our 1C who keeps getting dominated at 5 on 5 when we lose in the playoffs to lose his PP crutch to hopefully improve his 5 on 5 play?
Until Zibanejad is challenged, we’ll be in the same spot we are every year with him. The team needs to try something different with him to unlock his potential. I refuse to believe he’s not talented enough anymore to be good at 5 on 5.
It's not a matter of leaning on a crutch. If Zibanejad were capable of being better, he would be.
He's had one calendar year in his entire time in the NHL where he was really a good player at 5v5.
He has a good shot and he can facilitate off the rush, and those abilities are amplified with the man advantage, but he's never been a play-driver. You're asking him to "unlock his potential" at 31 and do something that he's pretty much never done.
He's talented at certain things but he's really, really bad at all of the things centers need to be good at to drive play. He doesn't handle the puck well in tight spaces, his zone entries are bad, he couldn't find the boards on a map, and his 5v5 defense is overrated. He's a rush winger who takes faceoffs.
We're paying him $8.5m a year and it would asinine to remove him from part of the game where he actually provides value.
All to give PP1 time to Lafreniere who has 5 career powerplay goals and isn't a fit on the first unit.