Duchene2MacKinnon
In the hands of Genius
- Aug 8, 2006
- 45,300
- 9,465
At what point does Bielsa adjust his tactical approach?
If he doesn’t, could he be labeled as stubborn and unable to adjust tactics?
What is the prime initiative?
It’s still attractive to watch. For neutrals at least. I’m sure there at least some Leeds fans who feel that, as pretty as it is, there’s nothing fun about losing.
In a way they are fortunate that there are a couple real brutal teams in the league, because relegation one year often promotion is not fun. But I’d imagine the fans would still have street party at the end of the season- “We play so beautifully!”
Playing attractive football is great, but it ranks far below actually winning in a list of what’s important in this sport.
I know they aren’t going to be relegated, it’s an exaggeration to drive the point home.
I think winning could attract as many players as their play style would.
I’m not sure I agree that they’d be worse off in a more pragmatic approach, but the only thing there no way in hell is knowing that for sure. No one can say.
They are definitely going to struggle as the season goes on I think. They don't have the talent to play this way in the EPL, and don't have the defensive ability or tactics to stop counter attacking from better teams.I dunno, Leeds are very effective in transition. I think they'd do well to try and set up more like Leicester; you can still be an exciting offensive team while being pragmatic. It's not catenaccio or Bielsaball. There are a lot of counter-attacking teams in the PL that are used to much better teams than Leeds attacking them...I dunno, I think they're going to struggle more as the season goes on but who knows. Either way their games are always entertaining so I'll tune in.
It would have if they wanted to spend the money.Getting results didn't help Bournemouth or Stoke get better players. Pragmatism will only take a team so far.
Stoke's best finish their last stretch up was 9th, and they hovered around 9th-13th for 9 years before being relegated. Bournemouth also finished 9th one season, and were 12th, 14th, 16th, and 18th their other seasons.Getting results didn't help Bournemouth or Stoke get better players. Pragmatism will only take a team so far.
Getting results didn't help Bournemouth or Stoke get better players. Pragmatism will only take a team so far.
Yea this is pretty accurate. Eddie Howe was widely praised for always trying to play on the front foot.Bournemouth played very offensive football though, they were probably the least pragmatic of any newly lower to mid table team during the past decade.
To be fair, it's really 14 who are tied for top 10 and of those, 8 are English and 9 have been capped.Fun fact: 7 of the top 10 scorers are English (and 8/10 have been capped by England), which seems to me a very high number.
Jefferson Lerma (£25m), Nathan Ake (£21m), Dominic Solanke (£19m), Arnaut Danjuma (£16m), and Jordan Ibe (£16m) are their top 5 most expensive transfers.Off the top of my head and without looking, I can't think of a typical marquee PL buy that Bournemouth made. Was Jordon Ibe their most expensive buy?
To be fair, it's really 14 who are tied for top 10 and of those, 8 are English and 9 have been capped.
To be fair, 2/5 definitely worked out and a third seems to be coming good. But Solanke and Ibe were so poor as to nullify the others.Jefferson Lerma (£25m), Nathan Ake (£21m), Dominic Solanke (£19m), Arnaut Danjuma (£16m), and Jordan Ibe (£16m) are their top 5 most expensive transfers.
The point was more though that their front foot style of play did not attract top talent. Compare that with Leicester City who have not always played the most attacking football, but have managed to build up a club that has managed to bring in much more talented players like Tielemans, Fofana, Maddison, Castagne, Pereira, Soyuncu, Ndidi, Maguire, Kante, etc.To be fair, 2/5 definitely worked out and a third seems to be coming good. But Solanke and Ibe were so poor as to nullify the others.