En7ropy
Registered User
- Mar 24, 2008
- 447
- 6
From a source of a source of a source.
So you're francois gagnon?

From a source of a source of a source.
The excuses continue to pile on: he's injured; he's unhappy with his contract; the coaches misuse him, etc. The reality is, Subban is horribly overrated. Therrien, is doing nothing different than Babcock did with Subban at the Olympics. The shorthanded goal that Tampa Bay scored against the Canadiens is a microcosm of Subban's limitations. He lacks elite speed and the team has no one who can transport the puck consistently into the offensive zone. This is the task that Subban is supposedly great at. The great skating puck transporter. The truth is he can't do it. It has nothing to do with coaching. Without that ability , the team is reduced to a dump and chase play or trying to execute 'cute' entry plays at the blue line. At Tampa Bay, the 'cuteness' didn't work. And watching Subban try to catch Johnson with his clunking skating stride was pathetic. Make no mistake about it, Subban is a good player, but he is not the superstar that so many fans think. What you see this year is what you will get from Subban from hereon. The limitations in his skating will never allow him to be the franchise type player that can control the play in all three zones of the ice. Changing coaches will not make him faster. I , for one, would be very wary in paying him the lofty amounts he is asking for. I will make this prediction: if Montreal does in fact make him one of the highest paid players in the NHL, it will not take very long for the ever loyal Montreal fans to start booing Subban like he is treated in other arenas.
Come on...that Tyler Johnson breakaway was PK's fault?
DD put his 4 teamates in a horrible position and all of them were caught flat footed. Blaming PK's skating deficiencies for not being able to catch a guy who had a head start on him, while PK was caught flat footed is a self-serving argument to justify what you've been trying to sell on this board regarding his skating for weeks now.
I'll agree that PK's first few strides can be a little choppy, but once he gets going, he's a very powerful and agile skater.
Is Subban overrated? Meh...I don't really think that word holds much meaning to be honest. Some people rate Subban highly, other's don't, what does it really matter in the end?
He's had IMO, an uneven year...some spectacular play, mixed in with some subpar play. He can be much better than what he's shown this year, HOWEVER, I will also blame the coaching staff for this since it doesn't seem like he's getting much support.
There seems to be a constant will from people to change who PK is as a person and as a player, instead of just letting him developm organically, he is 24yrs old afterall. He hasn't come close to reaching his ceiling yet, there's a tendency to believe he's a finished product, when that couldn't be any further from the truth.
I'd personally like to see PK paired up with Tinordi...even when Gorges returns.
The excuses continue to pile on: he's injured; he's unhappy with his contract; the coaches misuse him, etc. The reality is, Subban is horribly overrated. Therrien, is doing nothing different than Babcock did with Subban at the Olympics. The shorthanded goal that Tampa Bay scored against the Canadiens is a microcosm of Subban's limitations. He lacks elite speed and the team has no one who can transport the puck consistently into the offensive zone. This is the task that Subban is supposedly great at. The great skating puck transporter. The truth is he can't do it. It has nothing to do with coaching. Without that ability , the team is reduced to a dump and chase play or trying to execute 'cute' entry plays at the blue line. At Tampa Bay, the 'cuteness' didn't work. And watching Subban try to catch Johnson with his clunking skating stride was pathetic. Make no mistake about it, Subban is a good player, but he is not the superstar that so many fans think. What you see this year is what you will get from Subban from hereon. The limitations in his skating will never allow him to be the franchise type player that can control the play in all three zones of the ice. Changing coaches will not make him faster. I , for one, would be very wary in paying him the lofty amounts he is asking for. I will make this prediction: if Montreal does in fact make him one of the highest paid players in the NHL, it will not take very long for the ever loyal Montreal fans to start booing Subban like he is treated in other arenas.
I try to sell nothing but my observations as to a player's abilities. Readers can accept it or not. In my view from watching hockey for over six decades, Subban's lack of elite straight-line speed will always limit his effectiveness. He's way too easy to forecheck, has limited recovery speed and will never be able to consistently control the flow of play. This is not a player that I would be paying $8 million dollars a year for.
I try to sell nothing but my observations as to a player's abilities. Readers can accept it or not. In my view from watching hockey for over six decades, Subban's lack of elite straight-line speed will always limit his effectiveness. He's way too easy to forecheck, has limited recovery speed and will never be able to consistently control the flow of play. This is not a player that I would be paying $8 million dollars a year for.
Subban is still very much raw in his game, there's still a great deal of untapped potential there, which is a scary thought because when he's on his game, there are few better IMO. If only we had a coaching staff that believed in him and challenged him, instead of trying to minimize his potential of making mistakes on the ice, we could actually see this guy become as good as anyone at his position in the league on a more consistent basis.
The shorthanded goal that Tampa Bay scored against the Canadiens is a microcosm of Subban's limitations.
Subban is an offensive d-man playing in a defensive system. Once he does what the coaching staff want him to do, or he plays in a system that fits him better, he will show his strenghts and he will know when and how to use them. It will create the illusion that he is playing better.
Well I think Subban is MUCH more than just an offensive Dman...we've seen this guy absolutely shut down some of the best players in the game
But I really think the coaching staff has marginalized him this year to the point where he's a lot more mistake prone than he ever has been.
Don't get me wrong, I do think that Subban is also responsible for some of his own struggles this year, he's multiplied the brain farts at an alarming rate this year something that, contrary to popular belief, we hadn't grown accustomed to in years prior.
But I also think the coaching staff has done a very poor job handling him this year...i'm not sure if he regressed, because I wasn't anticipating him having a better year this year, then he had last year - cause he was pretty stellar last year - but he's defininately not a better player, which at his age and talent, should be slightly concerning.
The coaching staff seems a bit confused as to what to do with him...they want him to grow as a player and leader, to become a more well-rounded defensman. Yet, they don't give him the opportunity to do so and would prefer living with the mistakes of older and soon-to-be-gone dmen before Subban.
It's just an odd situation to be honest...
That post makes me think. I often hope that Therrien and Bergevin are being Machiavellian not just dumb. With Bergevin it is hard to be sure but Therrien really looks like a heart on his sleeve kind of guy.
Therrien could be resting players for the playoffs and hiding his system but he could also be a clueless coach dragging a good team down.
Therrien could be preparing for the playoffs and he may know that systems that work in the regular season die in the playoffs or he could just believe coaches don't get fired for grinding and effort.
We'll find out, I just hope we don't find out with an embarrassing first round loss. I would love some surprises the first playoff game.
The excuses continue to pile on: he's injured; he's unhappy with his contract; the coaches misuse him, etc. The reality is, Subban is horribly overrated. Therrien, is doing nothing different than Babcock did with Subban at the Olympics. The shorthanded goal that Tampa Bay scored against the Canadiens is a microcosm of Subban's limitations. He lacks elite speed and the team has no one who can transport the puck consistently into the offensive zone. This is the task that Subban is supposedly great at. The great skating puck transporter. The truth is he can't do it. It has nothing to do with coaching. Without that ability , the team is reduced to a dump and chase play or trying to execute 'cute' entry plays at the blue line. At Tampa Bay, the 'cuteness' didn't work. And watching Subban try to catch Johnson with his clunking skating stride was pathetic. Make no mistake about it, Subban is a good player, but he is not the superstar that so many fans think. What you see this year is what you will get from Subban from hereon. The limitations in his skating will never allow him to be the franchise type player that can control the play in all three zones of the ice. Changing coaches will not make him faster. I , for one, would be very wary in paying him the lofty amounts he is asking for. I will make this prediction: if Montreal does in fact make him one of the highest paid players in the NHL, it will not take very long for the ever loyal Montreal fans to start booing Subban like he is treated in other arenas.
I think Subban has probably focused on his bulk strength for his "early years", partially making up for lacking height as an NHL defenseman. He will probably start picking up some work on his acceleration and quick twitch stuff now that he's maturing and has the strength part down.![]()
It would be pretty amazing if he did add that extra element. But I mean, he can already win Norris trophies and rate as one of the top 10 defensemen in the world even with that one minor relative flaw, so I don't see much point in overstating it.![]()
Just listening to Lebrun on TSN690 and he was talking about his top dmen who he would vote for concerning the Norris this year. He said even though Karlsson's offensive numbers are great he won't be on his list for the Norris because he doesn't play on the PK and his defensive game isn't great. Subban wasn't mentioned being on his list either but dmen like Weber, Doughty, Keith, Chara, and Pietangelo were.
He said he thinks the Norris should go to an all round dman and that got me thinking.. Is MT's refusal to play Subban on the PK hurting Subban's stock around the NHL and the media that he's strictly an offensive dman like what they consider Karlsson to be? Subban proved he could be a top PK dman before MT took over when the Habs were 2nd best in the NHL on the PK so I can't see any reason why he doesn't play on the PK now.
This has to be the biggest pile of crap I've seen in a long time on this board. The SH goal was his fault? Seriously?
I think PK looks a tad slower this year compared to his Norris season, and a bit less hardy as well. I think, and this is all supposition, that he may have put a bit too much bulk on his 6ft frame to be effective at his high-octane game, which requires great speed and great stamina. 220 pounds is a lot of meat to carry around for a guy his size, especially when you consider the type of game he plays.
Well, I think Keith deserve it this season. I will never understand why Therrien doesn't use Subban on the PK, even last season he was used more.
Then again, Subban isn't having the kind of season I think he can.
Just listening to Lebrun on TSN690 and he was talking about his top dmen who he would vote for concerning the Norris this year. He said even though Karlsson's offensive numbers are great he won't be on his list for the Norris because he doesn't play on the PK and his defensive game isn't great. Subban wasn't mentioned being on his list either but dmen like Weber, Doughty, Keith, Chara, and Pietangelo were.
He said he thinks the Norris should go to an all round dman and that got me thinking.. Is MT's refusal to play Subban on the PK hurting Subban's stock around the NHL and the media that he's strictly an offensive dman like what they consider Karlsson to be? Subban proved he could be a top PK dman before MT took over when the Habs were 2nd best in the NHL on the PK so I can't see any reason why he doesn't play on the PK now.
Looks like the canadiens didn't really think that it was an issue but Subban has been playing with Gorges & Bouillon for the most part of the year.
If you want to play him for 25 + minutes, you need to get him a good defense partner that can play big minutes.
A guy like Jay Bouwmester or a Seabrook
Everybody keeps reading it as Monocle when I write that.
Mononcle means 'uncle/my uncle' in french, but my usage stems more from saying ' un vieux mononcle', old out of touch fart who doesn't know jack **** about anything.
"Mononc" or "Mononcle" is a word in itself in Quebec. No space required. Like "goddammit".It would help if you inserted a space.
I try to sell nothing but my observations as to a player's abilities. Readers can accept it or not. In my view from watching hockey for over six decades, Subban's lack of elite straight-line speed will always limit his effectiveness. He's way too easy to forecheck, has limited recovery speed and will never be able to consistently control the flow of play. This is not a player that I would be paying $8 million dollars a year for.
Well, I think it goes without saying that it is. But worse than that, I feel like it is affecting Subban himself. He's more tenative and less physical in the defensive zone, makes more nervous mistakes than I've ever seen him make before, including his rookie cameos. It is not chicken and egg, it is pure cause and effect. The chains are holding him back and turning him into a worse player. It's not just about "stock".I don't think Subban deserves a mention for the Norris this season either and I agree Keith will likely win it. After listening to Lebrun though I just wondered if MT not playing Subban on the PK and not playing him tougher defensive minutes is hurting his stock around the NHL in general.
Perhaps I will have to explain myself better for the more simple minded ones. My position is not that Subban caused the odious turnover, that was all on Desharnais. The question that the more intuitive readers should be asking is: why was it that Desharnais was handling the puck in the first place on an entry play on the power play. Why was he carrying the puck? Where was our supposed elite, puck moving superstar? That's the microcosm I was referring to. For whatever reason or excuse you want to rely on, Subban is not the elite puck transporter that everyone portrays him to be.
I think its interesting how the discussion has slowly turned from Subban's one of the great skaters of the game to .... he's a tad slower this year. Talk about a pile of crap. Open your eyes and see what he is. There's a reason Babcock didn't play him at the Olympics: and it is all related to the obvious limitations in Subban's skating abilities.