WheresRamziAbid
Registered User
- Oct 31, 2013
- 7,286
- 2,105
A solid read
Yeah about right.
Overrates Mccann and Zar a bit but otherwise pretty spot on.
A solid read
"The model doesn’t believe that time is this season. Frankly, it’s not that worried at all and ranks the Penguins as the second-best team in the East Division behind only Boston, and the sixth-best overall."
From Dom L's preview.
“He’s not a great puck-mover. Matheson really isn’t either, mostly because he has a tendency to give it away. His 2019-20 transition numbers are clouded by time spent at forward, but in previous years he only barely had more successful possession exits than failed attempts. It helps explain why his defensive results are generally so poor and Florida usually saw just 46-to-47 percent of the chances with him on the ice. “
That is concerning.
“He’s not a great puck-mover. Matheson really isn’t either, mostly because he has a tendency to give it away. His 2019-20 transition numbers are clouded by time spent at forward, but in previous years he only barely had more successful possession exits than failed attempts. It helps explain why his defensive results are generally so poor and Florida usually saw just 46-to-47 percent of the chances with him on the ice. “
That is concerning.
Yup. Particularly if he's going to be next to Ceci.
Further deets from the article for those without access
Sid & Geno are predicted to continue to f***ing up people's days and are the biggest reason why his model loves us
Rust grades out as a 31-goal, 67-point pace next season next to Malkin and while Dom L isn't sure that reflects Rust's true talent, he is sure it reflects what's likely to happen next to Malkin
Guentzel is predicted to be nearly as destructive as Sid & Geno, which again might not reflect true talent levels, but is what he is next to them
Kapanen - "No Leaf had more [zone] entries than Kapanen last season, but he was only average in making a passing play once he entered the zone" - that will go down well with Sid for sure.
Doesn't love the Jankowski move much
Dumo-Tanger-Petts-Marino - "That quartet ranks fourth in the league"
Letang still elite by his model, although barely (well, technically barely not, but as he points out, that's semantics and driven by a guy who's no longer here)
Marino - "His 55 percent expected goals rate led all regular Penguins defenders thanks to his extremely stingy team-leading 1.88 expected goals against per 60 rate. That’s a mark bested by only four other defensemen last season and translated to actually strong goals against results too. It’s why his projected defensive impact for the upcoming seasons ranks ninth in the league (usage is important to keep in mind here though) and why he’s projected to provide number one defenseman value."
Bottom pairing is a possible issue
And Jarry and DeSmith are question marks
So it basically tells us what we already know. The top six/four should be capable of teabagging most of the league, but will have to do so, and if they do and if the goaltending comes up good, the depth just has to survive. And if the depth can do a bit better, then it starts getting fun.
Well we've only got him for 6 more seasons.
Also McCann rules.
If he wasn't with Ceci, I think it isn't as big of a concern. And we have to remember all of the Florida defenseman are turnover messes.
Then when Matheson fails with Ceci, Sully will be all like....Agreed.
Say, that guy looks familiar.Then when Matheson fails with Ceci, Sully will be all like....
His hockey IQ or lack thereof will undoubtedly be a challenge.Couple thoughts on Matheson based only on highlights (and lowlights) and today’s scrimmage:
His skating is good but is it “get yourself out of the mess you made” good? I’m not so sure, but he thinks so and that’s the problem. Couple times today he tried to skate it out but got closed off, and once or twice he tried to hold onto the puck and shield it and reverse it and it didn’t really work. Small stuff in a meaningless scrimmage with a bunch of guys that aren’t familiar with each other so probably no big deal but obviously what he’s been doing the last couple years hasn’t worked and he needs some tweaks.
Yup. Particularly if he's going to be next to Ceci.
Further deets from the article for those without access
Sid & Geno are predicted to continue to f***ing up people's days and are the biggest reason why his model loves us
Rust grades out as a 31-goal, 67-point pace next season next to Malkin and while Dom L isn't sure that reflects Rust's true talent, he is sure it reflects what's likely to happen next to Malkin
Guentzel is predicted to be nearly as destructive as Sid & Geno, which again might not reflect true talent levels, but is what he is next to them
Kapanen - "No Leaf had more [zone] entries than Kapanen last season, but he was only average in making a passing play once he entered the zone" - that will go down well with Sid for sure.
Doesn't love the Jankowski move much
Dumo-Tanger-Petts-Marino - "That quartet ranks fourth in the league"
Letang still elite by his model, although barely (well, technically barely not, but as he points out, that's semantics and driven by a guy who's no longer here)
Marino - "His 55 percent expected goals rate led all regular Penguins defenders thanks to his extremely stingy team-leading 1.88 expected goals against per 60 rate. That’s a mark bested by only four other defensemen last season and translated to actually strong goals against results too. It’s why his projected defensive impact for the upcoming seasons ranks ninth in the league (usage is important to keep in mind here though) and why he’s projected to provide number one defenseman value."
Bottom pairing is a possible issue
And Jarry and DeSmith are question marks
So it basically tells us what we already know. The top six/four should be capable of teabagging most of the league, but will have to do so, and if they do and if the goaltending comes up good, the depth just has to survive. And if the depth can do a bit better, then it starts getting fun.
Couple thoughts on Matheson based only on highlights (and lowlights) and today’s scrimmage:
His skating is good but is it “get yourself out of the mess you made” good? I’m not so sure, but he thinks so and that’s the problem. Couple times today he tried to skate it out but got closed off, and once or twice he tried to hold onto the puck and shield it and reverse it and it didn’t really work. Small stuff in a meaningless scrimmage with a bunch of guys that aren’t familiar with each other so probably no big deal but obviously what he’s been doing the last couple years hasn’t worked and he needs some tweaks.
Couple thoughts on Matheson based only on highlights (and lowlights) and today’s scrimmage:
His skating is good but is it “get yourself out of the mess you made” good? I’m not so sure, but he thinks so and that’s the problem. Couple times today he tried to skate it out but got closed off, and once or twice he tried to hold onto the puck and shield it and reverse it and it didn’t really work. Small stuff in a meaningless scrimmage with a bunch of guys that aren’t familiar with each other so probably no big deal but obviously what he’s been doing the last couple years hasn’t worked and he needs some tweaks.
Couple thoughts on Matheson based only on highlights (and lowlights) and today’s scrimmage:
His skating is good but is it “get yourself out of the mess you made” good? I’m not so sure, but he thinks so and that’s the problem. Couple times today he tried to skate it out but got closed off, and once or twice he tried to hold onto the puck and shield it and reverse it and it didn’t really work. Small stuff in a meaningless scrimmage with a bunch of guys that aren’t familiar with each other so probably no big deal but obviously what he’s been doing the last couple years hasn’t worked and he needs some tweaks.
Then when Matheson fails with Ceci, Sully will be all like....
Nah, they're properly rated; the surprise was how little the model thinks of Teddy Blueger.Yeah about right.
Overrates Mccann and Zar a bit but otherwise pretty spot on.
Nah, they're properly rated; the surprise was how little the model thinks of Teddy Blueger.
Oh, I see. I was thinking about the 'GSVA' grades he gives. He has McCann as 1.0 and Aston-Reese at 0.7, which makes sense, but Blueger is a measly 0.1.i was speaking to the write up where it has them driving the 3rd line.
neither is a play driver. They are both good defensively and McCann has the ability to put up points but they are complimentary pieces.
maybe thats a semantics thing on my side but thats my thoughts