Confirmed Trade: [PIT/NSH] Philip Tomasino for 2027 4th round pick

Honour Over Glory

#firesully
Jan 30, 2012
81,987
46,310
Evangelista last season has been the only exception and alot of that was because there wasn't really anyone else. Brunette is the one giving Stamkos the large minutes he hasn't deserved 5 on 5. He's had more minutes than Forsberg many nights.

Trotz has publicly stated that everything about the line up and who plays is left up to Brunette, which means he's basically moved out two guys Brunette refused to play in Fabbro and Tomasino.

Right now Fabbro is making Brunette and Trotz both look like idiots, we will see how Tomasino turns out.

Also shouldn't confuse us giving Brunette alot of flak for not giving Trotz blame. Alot of us think he should be fired too.
When a GM makes 2 massive investments on offense like Stamkos and Marchessault, he can't afford to have his coach play them less, because they signed there for a reason, they're established top 6 players that have a ton of pedigree and were told what their usage would be so to blame the coach on that is a little absurd, ridiculous actually.

Stamkos and Marchessault are essentially playing similar minutes to what they were getting in Tampa and VGK. The issue is, the Preds aren't replacing 2 players that played those minutes last year. They lost who? Sherwood, Zucker, and Glass? Evanglista lost minutes on the powerplay which makes sense when you add Stamkos and Marchessault, but he's playing 30seconds less ES than last year, L'Heureux is a rookie so that is whatever (there's no TOI from last year for him to be mad about a drop this year).

All 3 averaged 13mins and some change or under. But you add 2 players that play 17-18+ on average? Yeah that's going to eat up a lot. Some of the players did see an increase in ice time, the younger players, but that's the nature of adding 2 big pieces like that. The team was never in need of those 2 and the GM f***ed it. Is Brunette the problem? Maybe a little, but what he did last season for a rebuild is something Trotz should have looked at as a good sign of the future, instead he went and blew his cap space to land 2 big names like they were suddenly contenders and he was some genius in his own mind - he isn't.

Your gripes with Fabbro are 100% legit though, that was some insane f*** up by Trotz. To keep Luke Schenn over Dante Fabbro? Lol. They were already lacking in RHD, to just waive one like that is ridiculous.
 

Armourboy

Hey! We suck!
Jan 20, 2014
20,880
12,788
Shelbyville, TN
When a GM makes 2 massive investments on offense like Stamkos and Marchessault, he can't afford to have his coach play them less, because they signed there for a reason, they're established top 6 players that have a ton of pedigree and were told what their usage would be so to blame the coach on that is a little absurd, ridiculous actually.

Stamkos and Marchessault are essentially playing similar minutes to what they were getting in Tampa and VGK. The issue is, the Preds aren't replacing 2 players that played those minutes last year. They lost who? Sherwood, Zucker, and Glass? Evanglista lost minutes on the powerplay which makes sense when you add Stamkos and Marchessault, but he's playing 30seconds less ES than last year, L'Heureux is a rookie so that is whatever (there's no TOI from last year for him to be mad about a drop this year).

All 3 averaged 13mins and some change or under. But you add 2 players that play 17-18+ on average? Yeah that's going to eat up a lot. Some of the players did see an increase in ice time, the younger players, but that's the nature of adding 2 big pieces like that. The team was never in need of those 2 and the GM f***ed it. Is Brunette the problem? Maybe a little, but what he did last season for a rebuild is something Trotz should have looked at as a good sign of the future, instead he went and blew his cap space to land 2 big names like they were suddenly contenders and he was some genius in his own mind - he isn't.

Your gripes with Fabbro are 100% legit though, that was some insane f*** up by Trotz. To keep Luke Schenn over Dante Fabbro? Lol. They were already lacking in RHD, to just waive one like that is ridiculous.
My main fault with Trotz is the allowing his coach to waste young talent and him getting sucked in by one hot stretch to think he had a good team and coach. That 18 game stretch is going to set this franchise back a decade if Trotz can't course correct

Brunette isn't a good coach though. Good coaches make teams better and his on ice decisions, line up changes, line blendering, TOI useage, and garbage systems actively make the team worse. It doesn't matter though because based on Trotz's own words he is going to give his coach a chance to learn and make mistakes, oddly enough something Brunette won't allow his younger players in return.
 

mattihp

Registered User
Aug 2, 2004
21,064
3,401
Uppsala, Sweden
My main fault with Trotz is the allowing his coach to waste young talent and him getting sucked in by one hot stretch to think he had a good team and coach. That 18 game stretch is going to set this franchise back a decade if Trotz can't course correct

Brunette isn't a good coach though. Good coaches make teams better and his on ice decisions, line up changes, line blendering, TOI useage, and garbage systems actively make the team worse. It doesn't matter though because based on Trotz's own words he is going to give his coach a chance to learn and make mistakes, oddly enough something Brunette won't allow his younger players in return.
Brunette is clever and understands hockey. He would be an amazing assistant coach.
 

mattihp

Registered User
Aug 2, 2004
21,064
3,401
Uppsala, Sweden
His current offensive system says he doesn't understand it all that well. Seriously watch a Preds game one night and be astounded.
No, what it says is that he can't make an offensive system. Brunette is nowhere close to being the guy to shape the way a team's strategies in total. He would be really good at working on details though!
 

Armourboy

Hey! We suck!
Jan 20, 2014
20,880
12,788
Shelbyville, TN
No, what it says is that he can't make an offensive system. Brunette is nowhere close to being the guy to shape the way a team's strategies in total. He would be really good at working on details though!
Oh we've heard over and over about details on the broadcasts. Oddly enough the Preds fan base is still trying to figure out which ones he is talking about cause they are all bad.
 

Porter Stoutheart

Seen Stamkos?
Jun 14, 2017
16,144
12,673
It just seems to me like maybe Brunette's ideas would work better if he had different kinds of players. He's got a relatively old and sluggish roster, and not much skill on the back end especially. Most coaches I've seen would take a roster like that and adopt something of a different gameplan that doesn't rely so much on attacking with speed and jumping the D up constantly into the offensive zone. I've usually seen coaches "simplify" or fall back into adopting a safe/conservative gameplan when faced with the kinds of execution issues and string of losing efforts that the Preds have put forth this season. :dunno:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad