Proposal: [PIT] [ANA] Poulin for LaCombe

MMC

Global Moderator
May 11, 2014
51,226
43,249
Orange County, CA
I mean Anaheim has no cap problems so maybe a bad for bad swap isn't necessary. I'm fine just sending Gryzelcyk to WBS, or just shooting him into the sun.

In concept though, another Sprong for Pettersson deal is what we're looking for.
You should probably consider what the other team is looking for as well
 

Petes2424

Registered User
Aug 4, 2005
8,498
3,300
Good bet Anaheim could get someone like Berggren or Robertson level for Lacombe. He’s gonna be a solid 4/5 through his prime. He’s at the point he just needs to bank more experience and maturity now.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,664
86,232
Redmond, WA
Good bet Anaheim could get someone like Berggren or Robertson level for Lacombe. He’s gonna be a solid 4/5 through his prime. He’s at the point he just needs to bank more experience and maturity now.

Yeah I could see Puustinen for Lacombe being of more interest to them. Puustinen is a bit older but he's more of a proven NHL player than Poulin.
 

FiveTacos

Registered User
Oct 2, 2017
1,014
1,793
The Twilight Zone
Who’s the underwhelming AHL dman you speak of?

It's sure as hell not Lacombe, who's never played a single game in the AHL. Even if he doesn't improve one lick, he's already good enough for a decent career as a 3rd pairing NHLer. Worse guys than him are hanging around on NHL rosters.

Yeah I could see Puustinen for Lacombe being of more interest to them. Puustinen is a bit older but he's more of a proven NHL player than Poulin.

All he's proven is that he's a 25 year old undersized skill player who doesn't score a lot.
 

Crazy8oooo

Puck Off!
Sep 12, 2010
2,490
1,434
Orange County
It's sure as hell not Lacombe, who's never played a single game in the AHL. Even if he doesn't improve one lick, he's already good enough for a decent career as a 3rd pairing NHLer. Worse guys than him are hanging around on NHL rosters.
Yep. Not sure why he’s making comments about a player he obviously knows nothing about.
 

FiveTacos

Registered User
Oct 2, 2017
1,014
1,793
The Twilight Zone
The career high doesn't matter if Zegras only has like 20 points in his last 2 years and is pacing for like 16 points this year.

It's not like it was ages ago. One injury plagued year last year where he played hurt and out of position, then broke his ankle.

And have you checked his splits at LW vs C? He's played around the same number of games at each position the last two years, but overall he's gotten 15 of his 19 points at C. Which is probably why they've finally given up on the LW experiment the last two weeks.

But sure, Puustinen is very similar to Zegras at LW. Problem is, Zegras as a LW .... sucks.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad