OT: Pirates Talk: That Skenes guy is okay at teh baseball

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,877
86,649
Redmond, WA
Most of the positive moves that this organization tends to make feel like step 1 or even step 0 to something that needs to be bigger.

Clearing the roster spots of guys who aren't going to make an impact (or worse) like BDLC or Joe is a good thing. Purely stating the obvious, but the needed next step is finding something on offense that is going to be actual impact.

Even if we take a swing at a BDLC/Joe type reclamation/upside who is two years younger, that's not enough. Personally, I am pessimistic that we'll do anything like that. I don't have the energy to dream up potential possible scenarios -- it's signing Santander, or boldly figuring out some way to trade a guy like Jones or Chandler for a meaningful bat, etc. We'll see.

First of all, welcome back. Was wondering where you had gone.

I agree with you generally, but the reason I’d go with a reclamation/upside to replace DLC is because it gives you more money to use elsewhere. This team has quite a few holes it needs to address and Nutting wouldn’t approve the money needed to fill all of them in free agency. The appeal of going for someone like Hays in my eyes is that it fills a roster spot with a legitimate MLBer with legitimately good upside for not super expensive.

It’s a dream scenario, but I’d be hoping to sign Hays to like a 1 year, $5 million deal and Walker to a 3 year, $60 million deal. Go cheap with Hays to fill the RF spot to go big at 1B.
 

bigdaddyk88

Registered User
Apr 21, 2019
4,574
903
Chapmen and Perez made 18 million combined that should be enough for a hitter
Taylor 4 million to a reclamation OF
Plus 5 million to cutch bare minimum
 

ImporterExporter

"You're a boring old man"
Jun 18, 2013
19,281
8,287
Oblivion Express
There is more chance of me becoming an MLB GM than Nutting forking out 60 million over 3 years for a 1B. And I love Walker. Wish we'd actually target him. We won't.

Read the room, the history, and the owner.

The honest to goodness name they should be throwing every penny at is Roki Sasaki. We do actually have a chance to compete for him given he's coming out of Japan early but I'm also not foolish enough to think we'd have any pitch that could get him here.

It's a rare case of where money isn't the problem.

The Pirates just blow ass.

They cut people late in the year (Rowdy), then lie about it to the media and dumbass fanbase, over a couple hundred K owed.

There is talent to be better. There really f***ing is.

We just have a cheap and moronic owner who knows or cares nothing about the game. And that filters down through the rest of the org.

Until they prove me wrong, I'm right.
 

Fogel

Analytics please
May 10, 2010
1,822
344
PA
There is literally no reason not to throw the entire international pool at Sasaki even if you have to break on some unspoken agreements. A possible #1 at ~4.75M and cost controlled like a rookie? All teams should be in on that and it isn't mind numbingly expensive so this could actually be a possible Pirates move since it can be fairly inexpensive. Hell, it would even be worth executing some trades to try to get more international space even if you whiff on signing him. Bednar was paid 4.15M this past year so he would be a little more than him. Skenes and Sasaki would be nuts and such a draw.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,877
86,649
Redmond, WA
There is literally no reason not to throw the entire international pool at Sasaki even if you have to break on some unspoken agreements. A possible #1 at ~4.75M and cost controlled like a rookie? All teams should be in on that and it isn't mind numbingly expensive so this could actually be a possible Pirates move since it can be fairly inexpensive. Hell, it would even be worth executing some trades to try to get more international space even if you whiff on signing him. Bednar was paid 4.15M this past year so he would be a little more than him. Skenes and Sasaki would be nuts and such a draw.

The reason to not do that is that he already basically has a deal done with the Dodgers and the Pirates aren't going to get him over the Dodgers.
 

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
85,877
86,649
Redmond, WA
I'm so happy to have the SP depth the Pirates have solely because we won't ever have to discuss signing a mid rotation starter in free agency for a while :laugh:

Speaking of SP, I just saw that Jones did accrue the full year of service last year in the MLB, so I believe that also means he'll be a FA for the 2030 season. I wasn't sure if his rehab time was considered an injury demotion or just a normal demotion, but it looks like he also accrued the full year. It's not the end of the world and it's something they can work around (I figure Jones will have some sort of cold spell that they'll send him to the minors to recover on next year), but it's not ideal to have both Skenes and Jones hitting FA in the same year.
 

Fogel

Analytics please
May 10, 2010
1,822
344
PA
The reason to not do that is that he already basically has a deal done with the Dodgers and the Pirates aren't going to get him over the Dodgers.
If it was the Dodgers, he could sign now when they have by the most international money left vs. everyone having closer to 5-7M when the 2025 pool opens up in January. For Sasaki, the difference of between 2024 and 2025 international money is pretty insignificant when compared to his potential off field endorsements which might be hampered if he was with Ohtani and Yamammoto.
 

DJ Spinoza

Registered User
Aug 7, 2003
25,932
4,505
I don't think the Pirates will get Sasaki (though I agree with Fogel that we should try to do whatever we can), but I honestly do think there is a pitch to get Sasaki on the Pirates. It's Paul Skenes.

I was one of, if not the most vocal anti-FO people in terms of the decision to start Skenes in the minors. I will be for Chandler if he looks good in ST but that's a topic for another day. It's possible to try and make a counterfactual argument that Skenes would have had the same exact success if he had skipped the minors assignment this year (and effectively skipped the minors altogether, given that his post-draft appearances were closer to a PR tour), but we'll never know.

He had the space and time to iron out his approach, get comfortable with sequencing, sharpen the new pitch, etc. It's pretty much impossible to argue that the results could have been any better. I barely feel the need to type out the rest of the thought -- he legitimately contended for Cy Young and will likely be looked at as a top-1 or 2 favorite headed into next season.

The Pirates pitch is as simple as the money basically being a wash wherever he goes and the fact that we had a similar situation with the most hyped pitching prospect in 20 years and have safeguarded his transition into young phenom. I continue to think that the Pirates are worth criticizing on tons of fronts, but it's hard to find much to really gripe about given how the whole situation turned out.

I have not followed all the ins and outs of Sasaki or much else this offseason, so I don't know exactly what's going on with him. I haven't seen anything about a landing spot that's more than rumor. If he's essentially going to have a somewhat-typical rookie contract type situation, with the similar-to-Skenes big payday awaiting after it ends, then I think there's a pretty strong argument that development and best situation for his career should be a high priority. There's no denying that there are other teams that have had success and have better resources, etc., but it's also the case that a guy like Yamamoto had some real ups and downs, though he's a harder comparison since he's slightly older.

Some degree of it can be chalked up to Skenes just being a 1/1 type of player, but regardless, there's much more of a level playing field here if the player wants to make sure he gets the best development possible. The Pirates pitch is that they'll help him transition to MLB as the best pitcher possible which will set himself up for the same kind of long career that a typical amateur draft player wants.
 

BusinessGoose

Registered User
May 19, 2022
4,995
4,636
Sacramento, CA
I just want them to show they can add $20mil

They really need to add 40 and we could legit go for NL Central....

I know, I know... I'll begin hoping in one hand and shitting in the other to see which fills up first
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad