Killion
Registered User
- Feb 19, 2010
- 36,763
- 3,220
Ya, I cant see Sarver responding well to threats. Just not happenin.... And other side of the coin, how does an NHL franchise survive having to split revenues with an NBA franchise thats not in Toronto or a major market? Especially this one? Only a few examples of that working & Phoenix, Arizona.... just not on.I would love to be a fly on the wall and hear that sales pitch. " We have such a deal for you "... " be a good neighbor and help out a hockey team "....
Even if Sarver was to give Bettman and Silver an hour of his time.... what could they possibly say to him to get him to sign up for giving away revenue just so the Coyotes might possibly tread water ( assuming they even do that well ) ? I just don't see how you sell this as being a positive for the Suns.
To me, unless the gov'ts in the state ( municipal and state ) went to Sarver and told him that the only way he would get a dime for a new arena anywhere would be under the pretense that he would have to share the building with the Coyotes. And even that, being blackmail and all, would probably just end up seeing the Suns being eventually sold / moved out of the state IMO.
It simply doesnt pass the smell-test madhi, I agree.Our next countdown is to the end of the clowns NDA's. No way they all keep quiet when that happen.
This sound a lot like a trial balloon to put pressure on the city of Phoenix to have a two teams one arena deal. I would not be shocked if the NBA is not even on board. I bet if asked they want nothing to do with it. So it ASU all over again. Off course they try again at the state level.
Oh yeah. Unless someone goes Rogue no point in holding ones breath awaiting the salacious details. Those skeletons locked up in the closet indefinitely I'm sure.....I'd bet a large amount of money The NDA's will last longer than Barroway's ownership of this team.
https://arizonasports.com/story/1140482/barroway-completes-buyout-coyotes-minority-owners/
Daly's comment...
“The reorganization is an effort to consolidate and strengthen the ownership and to resolve various disputes among the existing owners,†NHL Deputy Commissioner Bill Daly said. “We believe this will better position the club to achieve a long-term solution in the Valley.â€
**
Would be interesting to see what the disputes were. But like Killion said, probably unlikely.
Ok.... so its totally financed, and I'd read Dalys comment as this transaction being yet one further step towards achieving a long-term solution however.... we are in many ways right back to square one as its.... 100% financed. MGG your new owners of the Coyotes. Barroway the Strawman Owner, the fire still raging and you guys heaping more fuel on the fire with more debt & higher interest rates?.... Cool..... So, what is this "long-term solution" of which you speak Billy? Because it looks to me youve gone & dug yourselves an even deeper hole. But ok. Groovy. Whatever. Barroways' bought the club, retired the NHL debt etc, on the hook, but as he's now up to his ying-yang in debt what happens if he defaults with MGG or whatever these "long-term solutions" might be dont come to fruition in a timely fashion?
Last edited: