BrindamoursNose
Registered User
- Oct 14, 2008
- 20,543
- 14,667
I was literally typing up a post to tag you for something else.
It’s important to check our work on this, so here’s Time to Sacks from yesterday:
That is glacial. Quick is usually cut off at 2 Seconds. Only one is even close.
- 4.01
- 3.36
- 1.88
- 5.31
- 3.71
- 3.27
- 3.86
Holy f***ing shit broIt’s important to check our work on this, so here’s Time to Sacks from yesterday:
That is glacial. Quick is usually cut off at 2 Seconds. Only one is even close.
- 4.01
- 3.36
- 1.88
- 5.31
- 3.71
- 3.27
- 3.86
Whats REALLY crazy is when you notice the timestamp of the tweet. Basically posted at kickoff, and it played out exactly like that over the course of the game.That's actually crazy
Holy f***ing shit bro
If the play is designed to be #1 option to AJB on the slant, i have no issue with it. This is the only route really schemed open, imo.I don't understand what's wrong with the play call. AJ is wide open and Smith is too if the linebacker doesn't drop. There's two viable options pre-snap.
I don't think the read progressions are as static as you are saying, that has to adjust based on what the defense does