HogtownSabresfan
Registered User
- Jan 13, 2010
- 7,149
- 2,007
I think he's fired around 20-game mark with season down the tubes.
In reality, the team has the identity and skill of the players that compose it. They aren't playing hockey the way they are because fans hated how their head coach played hockey 20 years ago. Risto is still doing the dumb Risto clears he's been doing since we first saw him. Jack is doing Jack things, Sam Sam things. Berglund is the same player I watched play in St. Louis last season.The team has adopted the personality of its coach. The are soft and undisciplined. He will make it through the year, but the team will suffer for it.
Spare me. I have been involved in enough teams and organizations to know the tone is set at the top. If you want to excel the leader, i.e. the coach has to set the expectations and enforce them. We have no structure. What little we do have involves free lancing with defensemen and having little to no support. These are coaching decisions. The coach set this structure. The new talent is lost in where they are going and what the correct playnis. That is a failure to set the expectations communicate acceptable execution and rewarding compliance or enforcing deviation. It is his job to diagnose and correct Ristos mistakes or Jacks, or whomever. Q does it. Babcock does it. Sullivan does it. Housley does not.In reality, the team has the identity and skill of the players that compose it. They aren't playing hockey the way they are because fans hated how their head coach played hockey 20 years ago. Risto is still doing the dumb Risto clears he's been doing since we first saw him. Jack is doing Jack things, Sam Sam things. Berglund is the same player I watched play in St. Louis last season.
They're just a mediocre group of players that will hopefully be helped by development and a youth influx to not be mediocre sooner rather than later.
He's not getting fired. Pegulas believe in continuity and are probably sick of firing people, and while I see warts with Phil's lines (roughly as much as with any coach this team I've ever had in my life) the on-ice problems I see don't stem from him (like the forecasted stretch-passing with Disco, or the fact that our players with bad hands and hockey IQ are the ones that can't funnel the slot, while lines with good combinations of this stuff magically pull it off).
I do think that he will be the first whipping boy whenever anything goes wrong, including the fact that our roster just isn't up to snuff with what we've seen so far and so while not bleak like last year, we're still going to have some gross games to suffer through.
Every preseason game since at Toronto has given me visions of 17-18 all over again, which, he can't possibly survive past December.
Spare me. I have been involved in enough teams and organizations to know the tone is set at the top. If you want to excel the leader, i.e. the coach has to set the expectations and enforce them. We have no structure. What little we do have involves free lancing with defensemen and having little to no support. These are coaching decisions. The coach set this structure. The new talent is lost in where they are going and what the correct playnis. That is a failure to set the expectations communicate acceptable execution and rewarding compliance or enforcing deviation. It is his job to diagnose and correct Ristos mistakes or Jacks, or whomever. Q does it. Babcock does it. Sullivan does it. Housley does not.
Dale Hunter - but he coached for less than a full season.Honest questions: Who was the last HHoF inductee as a player who turned out to be a bona fide good NHL coach? How many HHoF players (in recent years) who coached were trash / fizzled out?
Gretzky,
Patrick Roy,
????