This is good in a way - it forces Ontario to play the youth of Portillo and Ingham.
Pheonix Copley on long-term injured reserve
- Thread starter kingskring
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
AbsentMojo
F-ing get up and hunt! Cmon Todd!
- Apr 18, 2018
- 10,470
- 10,770
And another benefit it will show if Rittich is worth anything or if Blake should go balls out to get a backup for Talbot (which he should be doing anyway)
That is really bad timing for Copley. I hope it is nothing serious.
I am curious how Rittich will fare
I am curious how Rittich will fare
lumbergh
It was an idea. I didn't say it was a good idea.
Maybe Rittich will pleasantly surprise us. It's so unpredictable what goalies will do over a short stretch.
I'm excited about the goalie pipeline for the first time in a while. Interested to see how the Portillo-Ingham tandem will fare in the AHL.
I'm excited about the goalie pipeline for the first time in a while. Interested to see how the Portillo-Ingham tandem will fare in the AHL.
lumbergh
It was an idea. I didn't say it was a good idea.
Rittich is basically a career backup. Looks to me like Blake already prepared for the possibility of Copley or Talbot failing.
Rittich will not pleasantly surprise.
I have watched him playing enough in AHL this year to be sure this is not going to happen.
ZJames
Registered User
Maybe not entirely. Portillo is playing pretty well, so he might make it as a serviceable journeyman. And Slukynsky is an intriguing prospect who is putting up great numbers. But other than those two, There's nothing.
Still, it looks better than it has in recent years with Portillo and Sluk.
fivehole32
Kicking rebounds to the slot
- Jan 11, 2015
- 482
- 621
To go on the LTIR I would think a torn tendon or something that required surgery. I don't think a muscle tear would put him out that long. Maybe a lower oblique or grade three groin tear would. Really sucks for him though.
Raccoon Jesus
We were right there
Absolutely. Hammer makes the pool look good and having Ingham/Portillo is nice. The problem is still the gigantic frigging gap between Portillo (23) and our 36 year old starter and his 31 year old backups. Not having an NHL-ready goalie/backup under the age of 31 is exactly how we arrived here.
With how certain they are it feels like hip or knee. Kings aren't usually so quick to LTIR anyone.
bland
Registered User
- Jul 1, 2004
- 8,194
- 12,550
Riiiiiiight. The Kings are “contenders” spending 25 cents on goaltenders this year.
FrozenKing18
Registered User
There was never going to be a backup in the 21-26 range, until recently why would any young goalie sign here with Quick still around? They took a stab at a few guys in the draft and missed, it happens and goalies are notoriously difficult to draft.
Now that it seems that the Pens have hitched their wagon to Jarry, I'd love if the Kings made a move for Ned, he put up good numbers behind a good Carolina team and even put up passable numbers when he was with the Detroit tire fires a few years ago. He's one of the underrated guys in the league, IMO, and would do really well behind the Kings structure, which is very similar to how the Canes play.
Now that it seems that the Pens have hitched their wagon to Jarry, I'd love if the Kings made a move for Ned, he put up good numbers behind a good Carolina team and even put up passable numbers when he was with the Detroit tire fires a few years ago. He's one of the underrated guys in the league, IMO, and would do really well behind the Kings structure, which is very similar to how the Canes play.
Sol
Smile
- Jun 30, 2017
- 25,052
- 21,320
I still can’t get over the fact that JohnJm still believes that getting PLD was more important than getting a goalie. lol
Raccoon Jesus
We were right there
One bad taco from being a 'contender' with David Rittich as #1 and a 23-year-old no NHL experience medium pedigree backup.
tigermask48
Maniacal Laugh
This comment is such revisionist history.
I'm sorry, but are you just ignoring the Kings acquiring Petersen specifically to be the guy that took over from Quick? Did i hallucinate the previous 5 years? The Kings put 4 years of development into Villalta and then let him walk to Arizona.
Sol
Smile
- Jun 30, 2017
- 25,052
- 21,320
I didn't @ you because you'd have nothing constructive to say so dont get ahead of yourself. Anyone who shares your belief is so far away from reason that there's no point in tagging you. Kings aren't struggling with scoring despite the fact that PLD has been trash. If Talbot goes down however, the Kings are likely cooked. A 3rd line C is not as valuable as 1A/1B. I don't know why you dont admit that.
Last edited:
I hope this kid tracks, he looks f***in GOOD
Steve Zissou
I'll order you a red cap and a Speedo.
- May 9, 2014
- 5,806
- 8,213
Any grade 3 tear takes the average person 8 weeks to recover from so any LBI injury in that category will likely be LTIR. Anything above a grade 1 is probably a LTIR job, even with professional physio for a goaltender. We’ve seen with Quick how troublesome muscle injuries can be for goaltenders.
Could be either muscle, tendon or miniscus and the speed they put him on LTIR will depend on how quickly they could get him in a MRI scanner.
Sorry, I'm not getting the connection. That discussion was about the goalie pipeline in the minors, not the NHL roster. Maybe I'm missing something?
tigermask48
Maniacal Laugh
Agreed, the only concern is he's college bound and going to a program that has 3 goalies on the roster next year already.
It's possible he's 3-5 years from even signing an NHL contract so it's not much help in the immediate future.
Unless LA decides to rush him to the AHL, which I really hope they don't because he already looks like he's improved a great deal from my limited veiwing of him in high school.
