MacDonald4MVP
Registered User
- May 7, 2016
- 10,202
- 5,522
If I'll get offensive role, kid gets defensive role kinda deal huh?maybe not unless one of the owners and his dad have a reason to lol
If I'll get offensive role, kid gets defensive role kinda deal huh?maybe not unless one of the owners and his dad have a reason to lol
Can you guys give me some insight into these Flyers players who made their NHL debut last season? Specifically what type of player they are, if they have an NHL future and what role they project as in the long-term. Thanks!
Oskar Lindblom
Tyrell Goulbourne
Danick Martel
Alex Lyon
Will O'Neill
Goulbourne is 10x the hockey player Rinaldo is...but still shouldn't be an NHL regular
Which is what? Delivering questionable hits and taking stupid penalties?Goulbourne might have slightly more skill. But, Rinaldo is a lot more effective at his "job".
Which is what? Delivering questionable hits and taking stupid penalties?
Which lead to him putting his team on the PKAt being an agitator and being an energy guy.
Which lead to him putting his team on the PK
No he really isn't. He's probably the least skilled player in the entire league and it goes back to his minor hockey days when he dad practically had to bribe his coaches so he would make the teamHe drew plenty of penalties as well. He wasn't a good hockey player, but he was better than Goul.
No he really isn't. He's probably the least skilled player in the entire league and it goes back to his minor hockey days when he dad practically had to bribe his coaches so he would make the team
Yeah...this is something I'll always wonder. Then again, he is on Arizona, who are a minor league franchiseI think Rinaldo sucks, but he has somehow managed to stay in the league.
Goulbourne is 10x the hockey player Rinaldo is...but still shouldn't be an NHL regular
Goulbourne is 10x the hockey player Rinaldo is...but still shouldn't be an NHL regular
And Radek Faska had 48 points in 59 OHL games as a 19 year old, and 10 points in 32 AHL games as a 20 year old. You can't just go off Junior scoring numbers, or even first year AHL production. Some prospects need more time to develop.
Just like you can't take fabulous junior numbers and think they will translate to NHL There are 130-140 point guys that can't do crap in the AHL little along NHL. Looking at fundamentals and how they play the game has every bit as much to do with it. Ruby has both fundamentals and plays a smart game so just has to work on the offensive side of his game. Who knows maybe he is just not that offensive but writing him off is not smart , he passes the eye test in many ways .And Radek Faska had 48 points in 59 OHL games as a 19 year old, and 10 points in 32 AHL games as a 20 year old. You can't just go off Junior scoring numbers, or even first year AHL production. Some prospects need more time to develop.
Rubtsov played well at the WJC and in the MemCup, where he was moved up to 1st line LW to help check Sam Steel's line. He was very solid in both high-level tourneys and appreciated by two good coaches. I think he'll may be better in the pro game with better players to play with, whether it is as a C or LW or RW is doesn't matter, he should be a contributor at the NHL level. Can play PK and PP too.Just like you can't take fabulous junior numbers and think they will translate to NHL There are 130-140 point guys that can't do crap in the AHL little along NHL. Looking at fundamentals and how they play the game has every bit as much to do with it. Ruby has both fundamentals and plays a smart game so just has to work on the offensive side of his game. Who knows maybe he is just not that offensive but writing him off is not smart , he passes the eye test in many ways .
Just like you can't take fabulous junior numbers and think they will translate to NHL There are 130-140 point guys that can't do crap in the AHL little along NHL. Looking at fundamentals and how they play the game has every bit as much to do with it. Ruby has both fundamentals and plays a smart game so just has to work on the offensive side of his game. Who knows maybe he is just not that offensive but writing him off is not smart , he passes the eye test in many ways .
Remember college freshmans can already be 21 years of age before they start college so you have to look what age they are not just if they are freshman sophomore junior seniorHave to look at age in both juniors and NCAA.
pre-draft (17) and post-draft (18) is far more impressive than PD+2 or overage (Martel) scoring.
same way in college, scoring as a freshman or sophomore is far more impressive than as a senior.
Reason is that at 19-20 a junior player is more physically mature than most of his peers, same for college juniors and seniors.
The top young scorers rarely stick around.