Value of: Petr Mrazek
- Thread starter BHawk21
- Start date
Namikaze Minato
Registered User
AhosDatsyukian
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2020
- 11,214
- 32,676
EddieTheEagle
Registered User
- Sep 17, 2006
- 1,535
- 3,068
You should see the chances that the Hawks give up. Most odd man rushes in the league by a mile, and zone coverage that makes Verizon look good.
Czechboy
Češi do toho!
- Apr 15, 2018
- 26,377
- 23,699
League average is .902. So yes, .05 above league average is pretty good. Then factor in what team he is doing it for.
BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 2,252
- 1,385
I said he has been great not his save percentage has been great. You would have to watch the games to know the difference.
HockeyVirus
Woll stan.
- Nov 15, 2020
- 18,145
- 27,887
Mrazek has always been capable of playing great for stretches. But there's a reason the Canes and Leafs recognized he was a mistake playing if they had any aspirations of winning anything
BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 2,252
- 1,385
Seems like something that could be useful in the playoffs if you don't have a goalie that can do that now.
I would think Canes fans would want him over Raanta or Kochetkov right now. Edmonton over Campbell? Detroit Husso? Tampa over Johansson? Seattles goalies? Minnys Goalies? Vanecek in NJ?
Toronto wont but hes better then Samsonov right now.
Czechboy
Češi do toho!
- Apr 15, 2018
- 26,377
- 23,699
I sort of felt like the big problem in TO wasn't how bad he played but that he was always hurt. I'm not defending him or trying to suggest he is Hellebyuck but his TO run was a very injury riddled affair.
should be #1 target for Devils and Oilers. Even maybe Toronto, but they have to figure out their d first
leeroggy
Registered User
- Jan 3, 2010
- 9,780
- 6,056
HockeyVirus
Woll stan.
- Nov 15, 2020
- 18,145
- 27,887
Not really because the downside is he can lose you the series very easily if he is off
BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 2,252
- 1,385
Yes, you would not be trading for his downside. The teams trading for him would either have him as a security blanket for there #1 or dont have a 1 and need a guy that can tandem and hope for a good stretch in the playoffs.
Hes a UFA. The hawks can retain back to 1.9million.
johnjm22
Pseudo Intellectual
- Aug 2, 2005
- 20,547
- 16,975
Kings might be interested. We'd need the Hawks to take Copely back and retain on Mrazek.
Mrazek has only played in LA 3 times, but he's been great there. Need a guy like him who be an upgrade over Copely and potentially get hot if 36 year old Talbot gets injured or goes cold.
www.statmuse.com
Mrazek has only played in LA 3 times, but he's been great there. Need a guy like him who be an upgrade over Copely and potentially get hot if 36 year old Talbot gets injured or goes cold.
Petr Mrazek Record All-time Vs Kings | StatMuse
Petr Mrazek is 3-2-1 against the Kings in his career.
WreckingCrew
Registered User
- Feb 4, 2015
- 13,094
- 40,165
It's All-Star level compared to what the Canes are currently getting
Blackhawkswincup
RIP Fugu
He plays on worst team in league and the difference between him in net and our #2 is clear
Mrazek
6-8 with 3.17 GAA and .907 Sv Pct (1 SO)
Soderblom
2-8-1 with 3.62 GAA and .884 Sv Pct
If Mrazek was on a better team his #'s would be much better
He is good low cost buy for team in need of goalie
AhosDatsyukian
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2020
- 11,214
- 32,676
I love me some Mrazek, his elite play down the stretch in '18-'19 got the Canes back into the playoffs for the first time in a decade. Super likeable guy and easy to root for. But I've seen enough of him to be confident in saying he would not be a great pickup for a team this year, no matter how well he has started this year for the hawks.
BHawk21
Registered User
- Mar 21, 2022
- 2,252
- 1,385
well this seems close minded. there are plenty of scenarios where picking up capable nhl goalie (playing very well) as a rental at a low cost and cap hit could benefit a team. you didnt even say a return...
