Aerchon
Registered User
- Jul 20, 2011
- 10,573
- 3,797
The book on Holland’s tenure in Edmonton has yet to be fully written. Thats fair enough. Chiarelli’s tenure was an unmitigated disaster and yet somehow the few things that did work out, often in spite of himself, are being hailed??! The best players we have today were already Oilers assets before Chia set foot in Alberta. Connor McDavid was a Chia pick but thats the biggest gimme in NHL history. Chia’s “team building” was largely one of colossal mistakes, disgustingly bad asset management, terrible allocation of cap space, and horrible identification of talent at the pro level. Full stop.
Holland has had one season to work and made a couple of moves that have panned out so far and a few that haven't but he's mostly been constrained by the mess Chia left. he hasn't really put his stamp on the team yet.
As for Chia's team building, most of the key pieces were either here already or were no-brainers (McDavid). Outside of Kassian and Koskinen, are there any Chia guys on the roster who are impact players?
Its a team game.
Kassian and Koskinen are both very big assets to this team. Huge.
Our defense outside of Klefbom and Nurse is all Chiarelli. Every bit of it.
Klefbom, Draisaitl, and McDavid contracts are huge wins as it stands.
Chaisson, as bad as he has been, is still the closest thing we have to an nhl top 9 forward.
The prospect pool is all under Chiarelli.
The vast majority of our team is still mostly Chiarelli.
I'm glad he is gone but he has left a positive mark on this team.
Perspective is interesting. Eberle for Strome was critiqued at the time as bad by most on here, I liked it even then. Today that trade would be a steal of a deal. But losing Strome for Spooner and then Gagner makes me throw up in my mouth.
The cautionary message in all this is Chiarelli deserves more credit but we are all glad he is gone and we should not get too high or low about Holland this early in his tenure.