Percentage of Canadian NHL players drops to 45%

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.

Newsworthy

Registered User
Jan 28, 2018
4,251
982
USA
Other countries who love hockey are catching up. This leads to intense competition. Canada is no longer dominating the world. No surprise really.
 

morehockeystats

Unusual hockey stats
Dec 13, 2016
632
308
Columbus
morehockeystats.com
Other countries who love hockey are catching up. This leads to intense competition. Canada is no longer dominating the world. No surprise really.
Canada didn't dominate the world from 1972 for about 25 years, and then it had been dominating clearly up until the latest WCOH in 2016, and hadn't been tested since because of the 2018 Olympics debacle.
 

Nino33

Registered User
Jul 5, 2015
1,828
441
Canada didn't dominate the world from 1972 for about 25 years, and then it had been dominating clearly up until the latest WCOH in 2016, and hadn't been tested since because of the 2018 Olympics debacle.
Between 1972 and 1997 there were 6 best-on-best tournaments, with Canada in the final every time and winning 4 (the USSR and USA won 1 each)
 

Nino33

Registered User
Jul 5, 2015
1,828
441
The Canada Cup was not exactly a level playing field.
But it was actual best-on-best (the only such competition of the era), and far leveler a playing field then any Olympics or Worlds during the era
 

morehockeystats

Unusual hockey stats
Dec 13, 2016
632
308
Columbus
morehockeystats.com
Between 1972 and 1997 there were 6 best-on-best tournaments, with Canada in the final every time and winning 4 (the USSR and USA won 1 each)
And then there was the Challenger's Cup.
And a "domination" isn't a tournament that ends with a 5:6, 6:5, 6:5 series. It's an "advantage" at best, but close to "parity".

The Canadian team has been the best in the world, no two ways about it, maybe with the small interception in 1979-1981.

But the advantage was not always a domination. The domination was in the 2014 Olympics, and in the WC in 2016.
 

Nino33

Registered User
Jul 5, 2015
1,828
441
And then there was the Challenger's Cup.
And a "domination" isn't a tournament that ends with a 5:6, 6:5, 6:5 series. It's an "advantage" at best, but close to "parity".
The "Challenge Cup" was an "NHL team" put together for a few days to play, not a Team Canada (for example, Salming/Hedberg/Nilsson are not Canadians; the logos on the front of the jerseys were USSR and NHL, not USSR and Canada)


But the advantage was not always a domination. The domination was in the 2014 Olympics, and in the WC in 2016.
IMO the fake teams ruined the 2016 World Cup and it isn't a best-on-best as a result (it was a meaningless tournament; personally I only watched a few minutes of a couple games, and I refused to watch any of the fake teams)

The discussion wasn't if Canada dominated in 2014 or starting in 2014, but if they didn't before 1997 and did after - in regards to Canada's performance pre/post 1997 in best-on-bests they won 4 of 6 and were in the final every time before 1997, and after 1997 they were in 4 of 6 finals (wining them all)
 
  • Like
Reactions: garbageteam

morehockeystats

Unusual hockey stats
Dec 13, 2016
632
308
Columbus
morehockeystats.com
The discussion wasn't if Canada dominated in 2014 or starting in 2014, but if they didn't before 1997 and did after - in regards to Canada's performance pre/post 1997 in best-on-bests they won 4 of 6 and were in the final every time before 1997, and after 1997 they were in 4 of 6 finals (wining them all)

The discussion has now switched to the definition of domination. :)
A domination of a team is when the team plays vs. the rest of the World and wins the match. :) (twice)
 

cowboy82nd

Registered User
Feb 19, 2012
5,288
2,570
Newnan, Georgia
Between 1972 and 1997 there were 6 best-on-best tournaments, with Canada in the final every time and winning 4 (the USSR and USA won 1 each)

Would you consider the Olympics as best on best tournaments? If so, your math is wrong. The USSR has won gold in the Olympics 4 times during the time frame you mentioned.
 

Nino33

Registered User
Jul 5, 2015
1,828
441
Would you consider the Olympics as best on best tournaments? If so, your math is wrong. The USSR has won gold in the Olympics 4 times during the time frame you mentioned.
I've never heard of anyone ever saying the Olympics was best-on-best outside of 1998-2014 (Olympics 1972-1994 was not best-on-best, just like the 2018 Olympics wasn't best-on-best)
 

DannyGallivan

Your world frightens and confuses me
Aug 25, 2017
7,623
10,322
Melonville
Would you consider the Olympics as best on best tournaments? If so, your math is wrong. The USSR has won gold in the Olympics 4 times during the time frame you mentioned.
You must be very young.

The NHL players were not a factor on Olympic rosters pre-1998. Therefore, the Olympics were clearly NOT a best on best tournament before then.

The bottom line is that it is still amazing that Canada still has almost half of all NHL players, well over 100 years after the birth of the league, especially when you consider the vast populations of the U.S and Russia. Essentially, it takes the rest of the hockey playing world to barely edge Canada on its own when it comes to the make up of the NHL.

... and we are still the team to beat at every best on best tournament. Yeah, I think Canada is doing pretty well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morehockeystats

qwerty

Registered User
Feb 4, 2007
3,001
994
Calgary
The NHL is a global game now. There's players coming up from all over the world now and other countries are doing as good or better a job of producing high quality hockey players.

I will say that in North America, the game has seemingly become very elitist overnight. I don't see too many kinds playing ball hockey in their garages and etc anymore or on the street whereas when I was younger, I use to see it all the time. Seems like the majority of players who make it to the show are ones who can afford the expensive equipment, ice time and trainers. Maybe that's why the game has tapered off a bit in Canada especially in more urban markets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mbraunm

Captain Bowie

Registered User
Jan 18, 2012
27,139
4,414
The NHL is a global game now. There's players coming up from all over the world now and other countries are doing as good or better a job of producing high quality hockey players.

I will say that in North America, the game has seemingly become very elitist overnight. I don't see too many kinds playing ball hockey in their garages and etc anymore or on the street whereas when I was younger, I use to see it all the time. Seems like the majority of players who make it to the show are ones who can afford the expensive equipment, ice time and trainers. Maybe that's why the game has tapered off a bit in Canada especially in more urban markets.
Two things:

1) It didn't happen overnight. It's been happening for decades.

2) Not seeing kicks playing casual street hockey games is not just a hockey thing, how often do you see kids playing pick-up basketball, or baseball or soccer? Kids simply don't spend their free time outside much anymore.
 

Canadiens1958

Registered User
Nov 30, 2007
20,020
2,783
Lake Memphremagog, QC.
Kids do not spend time outside anymore?

Given the growth of indoor, year round facilities for a vast majority of sports and the need for off ice or off field year round training it is to be expected.
 

Captain Bowie

Registered User
Jan 18, 2012
27,139
4,414
Kids do not spend time outside anymore?

Given the growth of indoor, year round facilities for a vast majority of sports and the need for off ice or off field year round training it is to be expected.
I mean strictly unorganized recreational time. Not practice or training or anything like that. I don't think many kids just grab a stick & puck/bat & glove/basketball and just head up to the park with a couple friends and simply play.
 

Uncle Rotter

Registered User
May 11, 2010
6,026
1,095
Kelowna, B.C.
Hello Everyone,

Please see the stats that i just compile from Eliteprospects.com and Capfriendly.com.
The number of Canadian players in the NHL is more like 42.48% not 44 or 45%

Please see data table. I have counted myself to verify.



Teams Cnd Players American players Total Players Cnd Players %US Players %link
Total 32220675842.48%27.18%
Anaheim Ducks1282842.86%28.57%https://www.eliteprospects.com/teams[/TD][TD]
Arizona Coyotes10112835.71%39.29%https://www.eliteprospects.com/team/72/arizona-coyotes[/TD][TD]
Boston Bruins4112218.18%50.00%https://www.eliteprospects.com/teams[/TD][TD]
Buffalo Sabres6102326.09%43.48%https://www.eliteprospects.com/teams[/TD][TD]
Calgary Flames 1162347.83%26.09%https://www.eliteprospects.com/teams[/TD][TD]
Carolina Hurricanes1042147.62%19.05%https://www.eliteprospects.com/teams[/TD][TD]
Chicago Blackhawks1162445.83%25.00%https://www.eliteprospects.com/teams[/TD][TD]
Colorado Avalanche962536.00%24.00%https://www.eliteprospects.com/teams[/TD][TD]
Columbus Blue Jackets952339.13%21.74%https://www.eliteprospects.com/teams[/TD][TD]
Dallas Stars1142839.29%14.29%
Detroit Red Wings962437.50%25.00%
Edmonton Oilers1612369.57%4.35%
Florida Pathers1742665.38%15.38%
LA Kings 992437.50%37.50%
Minnesota Wild6122524.00%48.00%
Montréal Canadiens1632564.00%12.00%
Nashville Predators1062638.46%23.08%
New Jersey Devils6142722.22%51.85%
New York Islanders1542560.00%16.00%
New York Rangers592420.83%37.50%
Ottawa Senators1252352.17%21.74%
Philadelphia Flyers1342552.00%16.00%
Pittsburgh Penguins7102429.17%41.67%
San Jose Sharks952339.13%21.74%
St. Louis Blues1542462.50%16.67%
Tampa Bay Lightning1152347.83%21.74%
Toronto Maple Leafs1152347.83%21.74%
Vancouver Canucks1352650.00%19.23%
Vegas Golden Knights1282646.15%30.77%
Washington Capitals672326.09%30.43%
Winnipeg Jets1192445.83%37.50%
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
From that data: teams with either an American coach or GM (or both) averaged 8 Canadians and 8 Americans, teams with Canadians at both coach and GM averaged 12 Canadians and 6 Americans.
 

qwerty

Registered User
Feb 4, 2007
3,001
994
Calgary
Two things:

1) It didn't happen overnight. It's been happening for decades.

2) Not seeing kicks playing casual street hockey games is not just a hockey thing, how often do you see kids playing pick-up basketball, or baseball or soccer? Kids simply don't spend their free time outside much anymore.
Across the street from me the basketball court and soccer field are usually occupied. I would agree that it’s not as full as it use to be a decade or 2 ago, but street hockey is almost non existent from what I’ve seen.

Maybe smaller towns still have that grassroots passion, I’m not sure. But if I’m the NHL, I’m worried that the game isn’t branching out enough to different avenues and demographics.
 

DannyGallivan

Your world frightens and confuses me
Aug 25, 2017
7,623
10,322
Melonville
Across the street from me the basketball court and soccer field are usually occupied. I would agree that it’s not as full as it use to be a decade or 2 ago, but street hockey is almost non existent from what I’ve seen.
Purely anecdotal. It is very prevalent on my street.
 

qwerty

Registered User
Feb 4, 2007
3,001
994
Calgary
Purely anecdotal. It is very prevalent on my street.
Possibly, you could very well be right. Just basing it on what I’ve seen vs what I use to see.

Maybe the iPhone generation has changed things for every sport, but I do believe the game is trending closer to the elitists side of things and pricing out the middle/lower class.

The demographics of the NHL pretty much confirms this. The most affluent fan base and also one of the most homogeneous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mbraunm

DannyGallivan

Your world frightens and confuses me
Aug 25, 2017
7,623
10,322
Melonville
Possibly, you could very well be right. Just basing it on what I’ve seen vs what I use to see.

Maybe the iPhone generation has changed things for every sport, but I do believe the game is trending closer to the elitists side of things and pricing out the middle/lower class.

The demographics of the NHL pretty much confirms this. The most affluent fan base and also one of the most homogeneous.

I really hope something can be done about this. The fact is, with (as you mentioned) the Iphone, video games and other "sedentary" leisure pursuits, a lot of kids aren't playing any sports (or enough of them). It's important to get them in love with the thrill of physical competition as early as possible.
 

qwerty

Registered User
Feb 4, 2007
3,001
994
Calgary
I really hope something can be done about this. The fact is, with (as you mentioned) the Iphone, video games and other "sedentary" leisure pursuits, a lot of kids aren't playing any sports (or enough of them). It's important to get them in love with the thrill of physical competition as early as possible.
I suspect it's just the way it is at this point. It's the evolution of generations. Kids don't seem to like things their parents generally like which could explain why so many chains and businesses are closing down as millennials continue to shape their own world.

I mean sure, sports are fantastic to watch and offer a lot of fun to play, but why would a kid be interested in waking up early to go to a cold rink and practice their crossovers when they can lay in a warm bed and immerse themselves in a far more luxurious virtual reality experience instead? In addition, why would parents be interested in exposing their children to the potential of physical harm and concussions?

With all of these factors in play, I suspect that the future of E-Sports will play an even bigger role in the future of sports competition.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad