Michael8771*
Guest
Not to nitpick too much but since the first seven or so games of the season Horny hasn't impressed me all that much. And his production has taken a noticeable drop.
Missed most of the third period, but from the two and a bit periods I did see, the Pens looked really dialed in. Structurally, strategically, this is a much better team than what we saw last season.
That third line was huge tonight. Glad to see Bennett get on the scoreboard in a big way, too. Hopefully that will be a confidence boost for him and tonight will become more the rule than the exception, production-wise. Downie and Sutter were also great tonight.
All in all, a good effort against one of the best in the East.
-----
Now for the minuses, but they're not necessarily just about tonight, but have been minuses for a while.
-Kunitz. What the ****? He's sleepwalking through this season. He's been absolutely terrible. If that's his effort level from here on out, I wouldn't shed a single tear if he's dealt. I don't give a damn about his goals (largely on the PP). The guy is a minus every single time he's out there 5 on 5.
-Adams/Sill. I thought the goal was to improve upon a pretty lousy and unproductive fourth line from last year. Sure, it's not allowing as many goals as last year's version did. But it's also zero threat to score, just like last year's version. If we're going far in the playoffs, line four will also have to chip in timely goals. Between Adams and Sill, I'd be surprised if they score 10 goals between them this season.
I'm a huge fan of that if it means Sill is demoted.I'm really not a fan of Megna as a 4th liner, I don't think he brings much in that role. If they made a call up just for 4th line duty, I'd rather look at guys like Uher or Farnham instead.
I'm a huge fan of that if it means Sill is demoted.
If the Pens don't make any trades they won't win a cup regardless. They need to fortify the top six (which we're all aware of). Leaving Bennett with Sutter long term makes a lot of sense.A trash top 6 with a killer third line is an excellent regular season strategy when you have Sid/Geno in the top 6
Sid/Geno are crushing it all alone at ES despite not producing, so they still draw top competition, while the 3rd line rakes against favorable matchups
3rd line gets ES points, Sid/Geno/Hörny get PP points, everyone's happy
Not okay with a trash top 6 in the playoffs though
Such as?I know you hate Sill, but I'm saying in the event he is demoted, I'd look at other players before Megna.
I know you hate Sill, but I'm saying in the event he is demoted, I'd look at other players before Megna.
I feel very confident in saying that Goc would very much appreciate this change.I think when everyone's healthy, a line of Spaling/Goc/Megna could actually be a quality 4th line. Enough defensive presence there, plus the added benefit of having 3 guys who can also score some goals, which the current 4th line is incapable of doing.
Of course, that would require Craig Adams also being scratched/waived. Apparently that's against the rules, based on the fact he's never out of the lineup.
Such as?
I think when everyone's healthy, a line of Spaling/Goc/Megna could actually be a quality 4th line. Enough defensive presence there, plus the added benefit of having 3 guys who can also score some goals, which the current 4th line is incapable of doing.
No doubt about that.I agree, Megna may actually work on the 4th line.
But anything is better than Sill.
Yes I hate Farnham also, you have a good memory.Farnham, who I know you also hate, or Uher. Both bring physical play, Uher is also solid defensively and can slot in at center if needed. Megna can play center a bit too, but he's looked lost every time I've seen him there. With Farnham, you get speed and tenacity, with Uher you get a guy that plays a solid all around game and is a pest, while not being inept offensively. Payerl is another candidate, I guess, but he hasn't impressed me in the games I've seen.
I think if they're going to roll 3 scoring lines, the 4th line should be a gritty, tough forechecking line. With the way the roster is currently composed, I don't see a place for Megna.
Farnham, who I know you also hate, or Uher. Both bring physical play, Uher is also solid defensively and can slot in at center if needed. Megna can play center a bit too, but he's looked lost every time I've seen him there. With Farnham, you get speed and tenacity, with Uher you get a guy that plays a solid all around game and is a pest, while not being inept offensively. Payerl is another candidate, I guess, but he hasn't impressed me in the games I've seen.
I think if they're going to roll 3 scoring lines, the 4th line should be a gritty, tough forechecking line. With the way the roster is currently composed, I don't see a place for Megna.
No doubt about that.
Yes I hate Farnham also, you have a good memory.
But Megna has speed, drives to the net and would be fairly skilled as far as 4th liners go. As I said Goc would likely appreciate this change. It's not just about physicality, it's about puck possession and creating scoring chances. We could use a bit more offense on the 4th line.
What do you think about Rust getting a look there? I haven't seen any WBS games yet this year, but I hear he's playing very responsibly on the defensive side of the puck and chipping in with the goals as well. I'm not sure how physically he's been playing though.
How about sick to your stomach.Sill is our new Adams and we still have Adams.
I don't know how to feel about this.
One of very few things I'd question MJ on but yeah, Sill, he's pretty bad.Yep Michael was right Sill is horrible hockey player. Worse than Glass
I could live with giving Uher a look, but I'd still prefer Megna.I think Uher could bring some of the same things, he's not quite as fast as Megna, but he's a bull in front of the net and has some pretty nice hands in tight. He's stronger along the boards as well. He could help a lot with possession.
How about sick to your stomach.
One of very few things I'd question MJ on but yeah, Sill, he's pretty bad.
I could live with giving Uher a look, but I'd still prefer Megna.
Well, that's how it goes I guess. I refer to myself in the 3rd person on occasion, not always. I try to mix things up a bit when discussing the pens, trades and such.I'd respect your posts a lot more if you stopped referring to yourself in the 3rd person. It comes off as creepy.
"It puts the lotion on it's skin or it gets the hose again."