Andy99
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 52,324
- 34,158
lol…plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose…at least it’s high event hockey!
For 1/2 of his cap hit. That's why he was a cap dump in the Jake trade and why we'd have to retain to get positive value on him. Its a crappy contract for a depth forward.Bunting is a guy that Colorado, Edmonton, New York, and Florida would love to have.
This was literally what I said I was worried about the second the trade was made. I was fine with Bunting and even liked the player, but I also wondered whether he'd even be allowed to play his game under Sullivan.To add to the Bunting issue, he's most effective when he's playing like a dirty rat.
We all know Sully would not have that on his team. Dubas should have known that.
'Tis better to lose with a clean roster than to win with a greasy one.This was literally what I said I was worried about the second the trade was made. I was fine with Bunting and even liked the player, but I also wondered whether he'd even be allowed to play his game under Sullivan.
Imagine that. Sullivan turning a guy who plays with bite into yet another vanilla forward. Who could have predicted that?
Does anyone remember seeing Sullivan throw a hit when he played?'Tis better to lose with a clean roster than to win with a greasy one.
- Book of Sully chapter 1, verse 69.
Does anyone remember seeing Sullivan throw a hit when he played?