BlindWillyMcHurt
ti kallisti
- May 31, 2004
- 36,515
- 31,654
Granlund got 21 games here after finding out his wife had left him for another man.
I didn't hear about this?
We are top many as it is already. Don't know if Gauthier is still injured. But with him we are 6 deepyou gotta have organizational depth to develop prospects.
The length’s are bad but roughly 5 million and they’re still useful players that a contender could plop on a 2nd or 3rd line.Another bad contract.
We are top many as it is already. Don't know if Gauthier is still injured. But with him we are 6 deep
Jarry
Ned
Blomqvist
Larsson
Murashov
Gauthier
The length’s are bad but roughly 5 million and they’re still useful players that a contender could plop on a 2nd or 3rd line.
We are all in agreement that Sullivan has to go, so we are just moving the goal posts as far as when we SHOULD have done it previously.That's fine though. If they adore him but team is hot garbage on the ice, remove him from the bench and bring him into the FSG FO if he's THAT well liked. It's just getting too hard to look at the product on the ice and not come to the conclusion that coaching is a BIG part of it.
White knighting for Hextall and Granlund. Of all the people to hitch your wagon to. Beyond bizarre.
And yeah, fixing the mistakes of the previous GM is expensive. We'd probably be in a better spot if we had Matheson-Marino as our 2nd pairing and Dickenson in the pipeline. But when you go out of your way to get older, slower, with an anemic roster, yeah, it costs you quite a bit to rectify that.
Hindsight is always 20/20. Had we known Sullivan would suck this hard in 2024, we should have fired him after 2017, right? We should have fired Byslma after 2010, but most certainly after 2012 and absolutely after 2014. When we did, I think most of us felt it was a couple years too late.
The Rangers series should have been the end. After that loss, after being up 3-1, there was more than enough "evidence" to support firing him—numerous failures that take away the "they never gave him a chance!" excuse.
For this season to be salvageable, it's a 2016 job all over again. Not only do you need a new coach, but Dubas will have to make a couple of shrewd trades to change the dynamics of the team a bit. What we are seeing is not a case of "this is a capable roster being held back by Sullivan". Fact is, the core is old and we likely are who we are. The goal isn't the cup, the goal is merely the playoffs.
Best solution - bottom 5 this year. Pick Misa. bottom 5 next year, pick McKenna. Usher in a new era with McGroarty-McKenna-Misa, Pickering-Brunicke, Blomqvist/Murashov. Then it's your mission to part out existing roster players for as much value as possible (Karlsson, Rust, Rakell, Eller, etc.).
Can they acquire a younger piece? UFAs are usually only a couple years younger at best and you’re seeing more and more staying with their teams.Yeah, I was being sarcastic.
What contender is paying a 2nd for 3 years of oft injured Rust or Rakell at 5 million when they can acquire a UFA or a younger piece for that much.
Hell, they could get Mikael Granlund!
Can they acquire a younger piece? UFAs are usually only a couple years younger at best and you’re seeing more and more staying with their teams.
I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I never eliminate the possibility of a NHL GM being myopic. It’s kind of their thing for most of them.
Right now is the best time to get rid of them. I don’t think either is going to age well.
Right now is the best time to get rid of them. I don’t think either is going to age well.
Man, if only the Penguins had more young players that could be traded for value to help replenish the prospect pool, like John Marino and Jared McCann. I can't imagine what the Penguins would have to do to have 27/28 year old prime aged players on good deals to trade for good value.
John Marino just returned two 2nds.
Jared McCann was likely offered to the entire league and returned a 7th and Hallander.
3 2nds would completely change this franchises direction…
Also to your point Empo. A smart franchise would trade young late 20 year olds for future building blocks.
Not a 2nd round pick, Michael Bunting, and a couple 21 year olds whose peak is a 3rd liner.
3 2nds is more than what they got for giving those guys away for nothing, and it's more than the Penguins will reasonably get for the guys who replaced them (Rust and Karlsson).
We got a 1st round pick two season removed and a 3rd round pick for Marino. Our management in it's infinite wisdom then proceeded to play said 1st round pick 8 games.
Once again. Why are you not crtical of the Guentzel deal if you're going to suddenly be critical of the Marino and McCann returns?
Jake Guentzel was the best forward available at the trade deadline and the best part of the return was the player we potentially got with the 2nd.
We got a 1st round pick two season removed and a 3rd round pick for Marino. Our management in it's infinite wisdom then proceeded to play said 1st round pick 8 games.
Once again. Why are you not crtical of the Guentzel deal if you're going to suddenly be critical of the Marino and McCann returns?
Jake Guentzel was the best forward available at the trade deadline and the best part of the return was the player we potentially got with the 2nd.
New Jersey sold Smith after he was coming off a bad year and was showing constant signs of decline, and he continued to suck for the Penguins and ended up a nothing piece that didn't pan out as a NHLer.
The Guentzel deal isn't remotely comparable to the McCann and Marino deals. The Guentzel deal lacked the upside (outside of Brunicke) but they got quantity back, they got 3 prospects that seem like they have good chances of being NHLers. Marino and Hallander only brought back 1 of those guys. I think Koivunen/Ponomarev/Hallander/Smith are all on the same level, but getting 2 of those plus a 2nd for a rental Guentzel is way different than getting 1 for a cost controlled Marino and McCann.
Granlund didn't fit largely because of the coach's usage of him.I had to look this up to verify it was accurate. Granlund didn't fit here at all, I wouldn't call it a mistake getting rid of him.
f*** having a chance, this team's cooked, charred, thrown away, and rotting at the landfill. Put 'em together so they can do cool shit and hopefully rack up some points because that's the only thing to watch for anymore after years of mismanagement and terrible coaching have ruined things beyond repair.I don't have a problem with putting Geno and Sid together. Sid's been garbage and they need him to be good if they're going to have any chance.
At this point, as long as the organization insists on keeping Sullivan, I'm just hoping to see Sid and Geno put up points. So if them playing together means 1 or 2 points for each guy, even if it still results in the Pens losing, oh well.I don't have a problem with putting Geno and Sid together. Sid's been garbage and they need him to be good if they're going to have any chance.
Granlund is the definition of an empty calorie scorer. Someone needs to get points on dog shit teams. Not shocked that people are suddenly complaining about him traded away.
Also convenient that the blame is being put on Dubas for trading away the guy that was a horrible fit on the team. Let's just ignore who actually traded for Granlund though