KIRK
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 109,700
- 51,216
It's clearly not all goaltending. I've acknowledged that much - we played cute, undisciplined, hockey. It was aggravating.
But goaltending was the difference tonight.
I'm not sure that Bryz wasn't equally bad though.
Aside from when Talbot shattered his stick and Geno refused to give the puck to anyone but Neal, Geno and Neal were glorified 5 on 3 decoys for Sid and the black hole. That's PP design.
All the offensive zone draws from the left dot-- on a night no less when Malkin actually was winning them-- for the third and fourth line. That's a coaching decision.
Dupuis with more ES ice time than Malkin, who at least finally looked like his head wasn't up his ***. That's a coaching decision.
I won't go into the other things, except to mention again that the shift that turned the game really started with three forwards up ice and Letang, with no pressure, forcing a stretch pass that got picked. 3 on 2 against and a goal 25 seconds later.
Individually, none of these things are important as the goaltending. But, there are things that, for example, a coach can do even as a bench manager to increase the chance that his team pulls out a game like this. You can't tell me that Bylsma did that. You can tell me he's a good coach for other reasons, but his bench management tonight was atrocious.