Paul Kariya or Alexander Mogilny?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Who was more skilled?

  • Kariya and it's not even close

    Votes: 26 30.6%
  • Kariya but it's close

    Votes: 34 40.0%
  • Even

    Votes: 6 7.1%
  • Watched neither in their primes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mogilny but it's close

    Votes: 14 16.5%
  • Mogilny and it's not even close

    Votes: 5 5.9%

  • Total voters
    85

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
10,828
7,851
Brampton, ON
I'm not sure he was necessarily more skilled (some say being consistent is a skill), but Kariya was definitely closer to his best more often and had a better prime and career.

Mogilny was outstanding in '93 and '96. He did benefit from playing with LaFontaine in '93 but had a big season away from him in '96. Kariya was one of the best wingers in the NHL until injuries took a toll on him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockey Outsider

amnesiac

Space Oddity
Jul 10, 2010
14,253
8,205
Montreal
Skilled? its Kariya.

Top 10 for the Hart 3 times (runner up in 96-97)

1st AS team x3
2nd AS team x 2

Mogilny's best Hart finish was 18th, and had 2x 2nd team AS
 

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
10,828
7,851
Brampton, ON
Skilled? its Kariya.

Top 10 for the Hart 3 times (runner up in 96-97)

1st AS team x3
2nd AS team x 2

Mogilny's best Hart finish was 18th, and had 2x 2nd team AS

Does Hart voting really reflect skill or talent level, though?

The voters take a lot of things into account, including defensive play (not that either was all that special at that) and value to team (which is subjective).

But Kariya's best seasons probably are better from an offensive standpoint. He was top five in scoring in '97 despite missing 13 games.
 

amnesiac

Space Oddity
Jul 10, 2010
14,253
8,205
Montreal
Does Hart voting really reflect skill or talent level, though?

The voters take a lot of things into account, including defensive play (not that either was all that special at that) and value to team (which is subjective).

But Kariya's best seasons probably are better from an offensive standpoint. He was top five in scoring in '97 despite missing 13 games.
Well as much as Mogilny was often injured after 96-97, he wasnt necessarily always considered a top winger in the game except for maybe 2 seasons in his career.

Kariya absolutely was a top winger from 95-00 (injured 97-98).

3x 1st team AS and 2x 2AS for Kariya vs only 2x 2AS for Mogilny is quite the proof.
 

Rorschach

Who the f*** is Trevor Moore?
Oct 9, 2006
11,438
2,015
Los Angeles
Kariya's game is flashier. Mogilny had much more formal training and thus even when his athleticism had taken a step down, he could still play bottom six on a championship team because his fundamentals are good.
 

Albatros

Registered User
Aug 19, 2017
13,488
8,799
Ostsee
Kariya in terms of excelling in NHL hockey. Was one of the best players in the game for quite a while despite having to play through the DPE as a small finesse player. Today he'd give anyone in the league a run for their money.
 

OgeeOgelthorpe

Riccis per 60 record holder
Feb 29, 2020
18,022
19,534
Call me crazy, but I think it’s even.

When AlMo was motivated he was electric. He should have been better than he was statistically. But when he wanted to be, he was a top 10 winger in the game. Kariya wanted to be a top 10 winger a lot more though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic

Dog

Arf! Arf! Arf!
Sponsor
Feb 9, 2016
3,035
1,432
Wasteland
Both went through injuries but Kariya had more of them with no fault giving. If was just one on one in their primes it would be about equal. As for players both were great. It's tough one! I went with Mogilny but if Kariya had more offense support it be close in points or possibly more.
 
Last edited:

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
44,173
20,180
Toronto, ON
Very lucky to have been able to watch Mogilny in a Leafs jersey. He was very electrifying (that's a very good word to describe him) when healthy. Being biased, I choose him for this poll. But it is close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dog

Staniowski

Registered User
Jan 13, 2018
3,785
3,400
The Maritimes
Both extremely skilled, and both had their careers greatly affected by injuries.

I think most people who saw them play at their respective bests would say they they are both in the top tier of skilled hockey players ever, and most would probably say Mogilny was a bit more skilled than Kariya.

Kariya was probably compared to Gretzky more than any other player, particularly before entering the NHL. Very focused, a great skater, shooter, and passer.

Mogilny perhaps had the best combination of skating and shooting skills of any hockey player ever, and probably nobody has ever been able to shoot in stride as well as Mogilny.

Mogilny's skills were very likely the most visually beautiful in hockey history (when he was young),
 

amnesiac

Space Oddity
Jul 10, 2010
14,253
8,205
Montreal
Seriously?! With a 76-goal, 127-pt season. I realize that was a weird year with lots of high scoring, including his own linemate. But it still seems insane that he never finished higher than 18th. Anti-Russian bias?

Its also insane that he's still not in the HOF.
18th for the Hart was actually the 95-96 season where he scored 55G/107P in VAN.

But after checking, you could only vote for the "top 3" for the awards in 92-93, so only 9 players got votes for the Hart, 1992-93 NHL Awards Voting | Hockey-Reference.com

Im sure Mogilny wouldve been 10-15th otherwise, but Lafontaine got all the Buffalo Hart votes.

Definitely should be in the HOF given his international career, but his injuries made him a big "what if". Again, he wasnt considered a top winger int he game really except for 93 and 96. Best he finished in scoring was 7th and 9th.
 
Last edited:

frisco

Some people claim that there's a woman to blame...
Sep 14, 2017
3,700
2,804
Northern Hemisphere
Production-wise they are pretty much the same with Mogilny the slight edge. Can't see why there are so many "Kariya and not close" votes.

Mogilny 1032 points in 990 GP. 86 in 124 playoff games.

Kariya 989 points in 989 GP. 39 in 46 playoff games.

My Best-Carey
 
  • Like
Reactions: OgeeOgelthorpe

LongWayDown37

Registered User
Mar 8, 2006
2,483
1,685
18th for the Hart was actually the 95-96 season where he scored 55G/107P in VAN.

But after checking, you could only vote for the "top 3" for the awards in 92-93, so only 9 players got votes for the Hart, 1992-93 NHL Awards Voting | Hockey-Reference.com

Im sure Mogilny wouldve been 10-15th otherwise, but Lafontaine got all the Buffalo Hart votes.

Definitely should be in the HOF given his international career, but his injuries made him a big "what if". Again, he wasnt considered a top winger int he game really except for 93 and 96. Best he finished in scoring was 7th and 9th.
Thanks. That makes it feel a little less crazy.
 

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,477
9,635
Production-wise they are pretty much the same with Mogilny the slight edge. Can't see why there are so many "Kariya and not close" votes.

Mogilny 1032 points in 990 GP. 86 in 124 playoff games.

Kariya 989 points in 989 GP. 39 in 46 playoff games.

My Best-Carey

For starters:

Best Scoring Finishes:

Mogilny: 7, 9, 14, 16
Kariya: 3, 3, 4, 7

Hart voting:

Mogilny: 18
Kariya: 2, 8, 9

All-Star Voting:

Mogilny: 2 second teams
Kariya: 3 first teams, 2 second teams
 

frisco

Some people claim that there's a woman to blame...
Sep 14, 2017
3,700
2,804
Northern Hemisphere
For starters:

Best Scoring Finishes:

Mogilny: 7, 9, 14, 16
Kariya: 3, 3, 4, 7

Hart voting:

Mogilny: 18
Kariya: 2, 8, 9

All-Star Voting:

Mogilny: 2 second teams
Kariya: 3 first teams, 2 second teams
Even if you go best four seasons, Kariya doesn't really come out on top.

Mogilny 53.4 goals, 100.3 points
Kariya 44.8 goals, 98.5 points

My Best-Carey
 

Hockey Outsider

Registered User
Jan 16, 2005
9,374
15,388
Even if you go best four seasons, Kariya doesn't really come out on top.

Mogilny 53.4 goals, 100.3 points
Kariya 44.8 goals, 98.5 points

My Best-Carey
Mogilny peaked in the early 1990's, when scoring was much higher. If you don't account for that, this method will tell you that Bernie Nicholls peaked higher than Crosby or Ovechkin.
 

frisco

Some people claim that there's a woman to blame...
Sep 14, 2017
3,700
2,804
Northern Hemisphere
Mogilny peaked in the early 1990's, when scoring was much higher. If you don't account for that, this method will tell you that Bernie Nicholls peaked higher than Crosby or Ovechkin.
Kind of losing the original thread purpose, but Nicholls in 1988-89, even adjusted, is slightly higher than Ovechkin or Crosby's best year using Hockey-Reference.

My Best-Carey
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,979
141,561
Bojangles Parking Lot
I answered the poll before realizing OP was talking only about skill. For pure skill, it’s really close. Mogilny was kind of like a Valeri Kamensky in the sense that he was one of the most purely skilled players in the world as a Soviet, and showed us enough in the NHL to see the superstar potential, but as the years wore on he gradually got less and less effective in an over-physical environment.

If we’re talking overall profile, this is more like Kariya AINEC.
 

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,477
9,635
Even if you go best four seasons, Kariya doesn't really come out on top.

Mogilny 53.4 goals, 100.3 points
Kariya 44.8 goals, 98.5 points

My Best-Carey

If one guy has scoring finishes of 3, 3, 4, 7 and the other guy has 7, 9, 14, 16, yes, Kariya actually does come out on top.
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
19,032
14,271
Scoring finishes and ward voting don't really tell us who was more skilled unless it's some star vs a plug. Kariya was a better NHL player but skill is very close, possibly Mogilny.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad