DoingItCoolKiwi
Registered User
- May 23, 2017
- 3,742
- 2,992
People focus too much on Suzuki, Caufield and Guhle. They are technically not part of the rebuild. We keep them because they are young enough and they'll be our vets once the rebuild is done and the current vets will be long gone.The rebuild will be done when it’s done. It’s silly to try to put a timetable on it. It doesn’t work that way.
It’s fine to add secondary scoring (Laine) along the way. But the rebuild will come from the core you’re building with and most of those guys are either not on the team yet or just getting started.
People need to stop putting hourglasses on the table and asking ‘are we there yet?’ No we’re not. And we’re not going to be there for a while.
maybe back in time for my EDM trip .....heres hoping
The core?The rebuild will be done when it’s done. It’s silly to try to put a timetable on it. It doesn’t work that way.
It’s fine to add secondary scoring (Laine) along the way. But the rebuild will come from the core you’re building with and most of those guys are either not on the team yet or just getting started.
People need to stop putting hourglasses on the table and asking ‘are we there yet?’ No we’re not. And we’re not going to be there for a while.
The rebuild will be done when it’s done. It’s silly to try to put a timetable on it. It doesn’t work that way.
It’s fine to add secondary scoring (Laine) along the way. But the rebuild will come from the core you’re building with and most of those guys are either not on the team yet or just getting started.
People need to stop putting hourglasses on the table and asking ‘are we there yet?’ No we’re not. And we’re not going to be there for a while.
Those three players are the 'vets' on the team. A lot will be expected of them. But I get what you're saying.People focus too much on Suzuki, Caufield and Guhle. They are technically not part of the rebuild. We keep them because they are young enough and they'll be our vets once the rebuild is done and the current vets will be long gone.
I mean KH got hired in january 2022. That's not even 3 years. Obviously the kids he drafted are for the most part not ready yet. Outise of the Connar Bedard type of prospects kids should be expected to be ready before 21 at the earliest. I've been saying since day 1 that did not expect result before the 2025-26 season and i still think the same.
It is have derailed it , but it sure screwed it upThose three players are the 'vets' on the team. A lot will be expected of them. But I get what you're saying.
I'm surprised so many people think that us losing Laine has derailed everything... he was always a depth scorer who was likely to leave in two years.
Pretty much in-linr with what we've been saying.
Knowing Laine,
It will take what it takes.The core?
You mean 2017 draftee #1C Suzuki?
Or 2019 draftees Dach, Caufield and Newhook?
2020 draftee #1 D Guhle?
Suzuki is 7 years out of his draft year. SEVEN.
By year 7 Landeskog had his full core in place.
By year 7 Barkov was on a contender
By year 7 Crosby had a cup.
By year 7 Ovi had made the POs 5 times
By year 7 Toews had two cups
By year 7 Stamkos had a SCF loss and three PO appearances out of 7.
By year 7 Pietrangelo had 4 PO appearances.
By year 7, Kopitar had a cup.
How long are we looking for the rebuild to last?
Did it?It is have derailed it , but it sure screwed it up
Again, for the nth time, it doesn't matter what year "we started to rebuild". That's just a flashy word used by people.It will take what it takes.
If you seriously think we've been rebuilding since 2017, I don't know what to tell you. We haven't.
We had an idiot GM who acquired some talent along the way and wasn't around long enough to ruin them the way he'd runined previous players. That's not rebuilding.
maybe back in time for my EDM trip .....heres hoping
Laine as in the guy that was PPG over the last 100 games, is totally replaceable?Did it?
I don't think so. Laine is totally replaceable.
Only two three more years, lol.The core?
You mean 2017 draftee #1C Suzuki?
Or 2019 draftees Dach, Caufield and Newhook?
2020 draftee #1 D Guhle?
Suzuki is 7 years out of his draft year. SEVEN.
By year 7 Landeskog had his full core in place.
By year 7 Barkov was on a contender
By year 7 Crosby had a cup.
By year 7 Ovi had made the POs 5 times
By year 7 Toews had two cups
By year 7 Stamkos had a SCF loss and three PO appearances out of 7.
By year 7 Pietrangelo had 4 PO appearances.
By year 7, Kopitar had a cup.
How long are we looking for the rebuild to last?
Nick Suzuki is the only player over 25. We're nowhere near a mature team.Again, for the nth time, it doesn't matter what year "we started to rebuild". That's just a flashy word used by people.
We started accumulating in 2018.
Our core is comprised of 2017 and 2020 draftees mostly. All those players are primed.
Nah. I like the direction we're going. Suzuki's a perfect leader and Caufield should improve as he gets healthier.If we wanted to have a proper rebuild they should've traded those, this is what they decided, now is the time to flip the switch.
by who? Roy, lolDid it?
I don't think so. Laine is totally replaceable.
I honestly think KH wanted to get rid of Harris to open a spot for Struble and getting Laine was the best way to max Harris value (there's no reality where Harris was worth a high 2nd round pick). Two birds with one stone. I highly doubt KH does this trade if he thinks the team is ready. Acquiring that contract was way too risky for a playoffs team. For us there was no real risk. If it works then great if it doesn't then the situation remains the same and Laine leaves at the end of 2026.Those three players are the 'vets' on the team. A lot will be expected of them. But I get what you're saying.
I'm surprised so many people think that us losing Laine has derailed everything... he was always a depth scorer who was likely to leave in two years.
Anyone thinking he was coming in as a 40 goal guy was deluding themselves. He's a secondary scorer wrapped in a lotto ticket. He wasn't going to put up more than 25 in all likelyhood.Laine as in the guy that was PPG over the last 100 games, is totally replaceable?
I get that you're probably asked to be a light in the dark as a mod, but that's a lot.
6 months is a comeback in March. 4 months would mean in January.6 months is short for gone for the year.
Lets hope 4, because the thought of watching Roy, Andy, or another scrub on the second line is nauseating.
Got to feel bad for NS knowing every night it is up to him to carry this team on his back. Imagine if he goes down, holy shit, we could be regulated to the AHL.
Anyone thinking he was coming in as a 40 goal guy was deluding themselves. He's a secondary scorer wrapped in a lotto ticket. He wasn't going to put up more than 25 in all likelyhood.
Nope. Roy wouldn't replace him. But we have tons to trade with if need be.by who? Roy, lol
Totally replaceable, complete non-sense.
As trade deadline acquisition …That would at least have him able to get games in this season, right?
Then why weren't more teams interested in him? Why were we paid to take him?Nothing in his career suggest he was topping out at 25 if healthy, including in Columbus. That's asinine.